Democracy and the environment in Latin America and Eastern Europe

Comparative Environmental Politics: Theory, Practice, and Prospects

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 199-229

  Hochstetler, Kathryn ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84894809828     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (79)

1. Andean Center for Economics in the Environment. 2001. Executive Profile of EnvironmentalManagement Andean Region. Washington, D.C.: Inter-American Development Bank
2. Asenjo, Rafael, Guillermo Espinoza, Fernando Valenzuela, and J. Jure. 2002. Regional PolicyDialogue on Environmental Executive Profile of Environmental Management SubregionSouth Cone: Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Paraguay, Uruguay. Washington, D.C.: Inter-American Development Bank.
3. Assetto, Valerie J., Eva Hajba, and Stephen P. Mumme. 2003. Democratization, Decentralization, and Local Environmental Policy Capacity: Hungary and Mexico. Social Science Journal 40 (2): 249- 268.
4. Auer, Matthew. 2001. Energy and Environmental Politics in Post-corporatist Mexico. Policy Studies Journal 29 (3): 437- 455.
5. Auer, Matthew R. 2004. Lessons from Leaders and Laggards: Appraising Environmental Reforms in Central and Eastern Europe and Russia. In Restoring Cursed Earth: Appraising Environmental Policy Reforms in Eastern Europe and Russia, ed. Matthew R. Auer, 1- 35. Lanham, Md.: Rowman and Littlefield.
6. Baber, Walter F., and Robert V. Bartlett. 2005. Deliberative Environmental Politics: Democracy and Ecological Rationality. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
7. Baker, Mark, and Jonathan Kusel. 2003. Community Forestry in the United States: Learning from the Past, Crafting the Future. Washington, D.C.: Island Press.
8. Baker, Susan, and Petr Jehlicka. 1998. Dilemmas of Transition: The Environment, Democracy and Economic Reform in East Central Europe- An Introduction. Environmental Politics 7 (10): 1- 27.
9. Berg, Marni. 1999. Environmental Protection and the Hungarian Transition. Social Science Journal 36 (2): 227- 251.
10. Blackman, Allen. 2005. Colombia ' s Discharge Fee Program: Incentives for Polluters or Regulators? Discussion Paper 05- 31. Washington, D.C.: Resources for the Future.
11. Botcheva, Liliana. 1996. Focus and Effectiveness of Environmental Activism in Eastern Europe: A Comparative Study of Environmental Movements in Bulgaria, Hungary, Slovakia, and Romania. Journal of Environment & Development 5 (3): 292- 308.
12. Carmin, Joann, and Stacy D. VanDeveer. 2004. Enlarging EU Environmental: Central and Eastern Europe from Transition to Accession. Environmental Politics 13 (1): 3- 24.
13. Carruthers, David. 2001. Environmental Politics in Chile: Legacies of Dictatorship and Democracy. Third World Quarterly 22 (3): 343- 358.
14. Carvalho, Georgia O. 2000. The Politics of Indigenous Land Rights in Brazil. Bulletin of Latin American Research 19 (4): 461- 478.
15. Crepaz, Markus M. L. 1995. Explaining National Variations of Air Pollution Levels: Political Institutions and their Impact on Environmental Policy-Making. Environmental Politics 4 (3): 391- 414.
16. Darst, Robert G. 1997. The Internationalization of Environmental Protection in the USSR and its Successor States. In The Internationalization of Environmental Protection, ed. Miranda A. Schreurs and Elizabeth C. Economy, 97- 133. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
17. Doherty, Brian, and Marius de Geus, eds. 1996. Democracy and Green Political Thought: Sustainability, Rights, and Citizenship. London: Routledge.
18. Dryzek, John S. 1997. The Politics of the Earth: Environmental Discourses. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
19. Eckersley, Robyn. 1996. Greening Liberal Democracy: The Rights Discourse Revisited. In Democracy and Green Political Thought: Sustainability, Rights, and Citizenship, ed. Brian Doherty and Marius de Geus, 212- 236. London: Routledge.
20. Eckersley, Robyn. 2004. The Green State: Rethinking Democracy and Sovereignty. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
21. Fagin, Adam. 1994. Environment and Transition in the Czech Republic. Environmental Politics 3 (3): 479- 494.
22. Fischer, Frank. 2000. Citizens, Experts, and the Environment: The Politics of Local Knowledge. Durham: Duke University Press.
23. Foresta, Ronald. 1991. Amazon Conservation in the Age of Development: The Limits of Providence. Gainesville: University Press of Florida.
24. Friedman, Elisabeth Jay, Kathryn Hochstetler, and Ann Marie Clark. 2005. Sovereignty, Democracy, and Global Civil Society: State-Society Relations at UN World Conferences. Albany: SUNY Press.
25. Gleditsch, Nils Petter, and Bj ø rn Otto Sverdrup. 2002. Democracy and the Environment. In Human Security and the Environment: International Comparisons, ed. Edward A. Page and Michael Redclift, 45- 70. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
26. Goodman, David, and Michael Redclift, 1991. Environment and Development in Latin America: The Politics of Sustainability. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.eds
27. Glushenkova, Helena I. 1999. Environmental Administrative Change in Russia in the 1990s. Environmental Politics 8 (2): 157- 164.
28. Grupo Y ' Guaz ú. 1995. Bases para la Armonizaci ó n de Exigencias Ambientales en el Mercosur. Buenos Aires: FARN.
29. Hardin, Garrett. 1968. The Tragedy of the Commons. Science 162: 1243- 1248.
30. Haughney, Diane. 2006. Neoliberal Economics, Democratic Transition, and Mapuche Demands for Rights in Chile. Gainesville: University Press of Florida.
31. Heilbroner, Robert L. 1974. An Inquiry into the Human Prospect. New York: Norton.
32. Hochstetler, Kathryn. 2004. Civil Society in Lula ' s Brazil. Working Paper CBS-57-04. Oxford, UK: Centre for Brazilian Studies, University of Oxford.
33. Hochstetler, Kathryn. 2005. Race to the Middle: Environmental Politics in the Mercosur Free Trade Agreement. In Handbook of Global Environmental Politics, ed. Peter Dauvergne, 348- 361. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
34. Hochstetler, Kathryn, and Margaret E. Keck. 2007. Greening Brazil: Environmental Activism in State and Society. Durham: Duke University Press.
35. Hochstetler, Kathryn, and Melinda Laituri. 2005. Methods in International Environmental Politics. In Palgrave Advances in International Environmental Politics, ed. Michele M. Betsill,Kathryn Hochstetler, and Dimitris Stevis, 82- 109. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave MacMillan.
36. Hochstetler, Kathryn, and Stephen P. Mumme. 1998. Environmental Movements and Democracy in Latin America. In Assessing Democracy in Latin America, ed. Philip Kelly, 37- 53. Boulder: Westview Press.
37. Hopkins, Jack W. 1995. Policymaking for Conservation in Latin America: National Parks, Reserves, and the Environment. Westport, Conn.: Praeger.
38. Hulme, David, and Marshall Murphree, 2001. African Wildlife and Livelihoods: The Promise and Performance of Community Conservation. Oxford, UK: James Currey Ltd.
39. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatistica. 2004. Funda ç õ es Privadas e Asocia ç õ es. http:// www.ibge.gov.br/home/estatistica/economia/fasfil/2005/default.shtm, accessed May 25, 2011.
40. Kaimowitz, David, Cristian Vallejos, Pablo B. Pacheco, and Raul Lopez. 1998. Municipal Governments and Forest Management in Lowland Bolivia. Journal of Environment & Development 7 (1): 45- 59.
41. Kotov, Vladimir, and Elena Nikitina. 1993. Russia in Transition: Obstacles to Environmental Protection. Environment 35 (10): 10- 20.
42. K ü tting, Gabriela. 1999. Environment, Society and International Relations- Towards More Effective International Agreements. London: Routledge.
43. Lafferty, William, and James Meadowcroft,1996. Democracy and the Environment: Problems and Prospects. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar. eds.
44. Lemos, Maria Carmen, and João L ú cio Farias de Oliveira. 2004. Can Water Reform Survive Politics? Institutional Change and River Basin Management in Cear á, Northeast Brazil. World Development 32 (12): 2121- 2137.
45. Li, Quan, and Rafael Reuveny. 2006. Democracy and Environmental Degradation. International Studies Quarterly 50 (4): 935- 956.
46. Lipset, Seymour Martin. 1959. Some Social Requisites of Democracy: Economic Development and Political Legitimacy. American Political Science Review 53 (1): 69- 105.
47. Mainwaring, Scott, Daniel Brinks, and An í bal P é rez-Li ñ á n. 2001. Classifying Political Regimes in Latin America, 1945- 1999. Studies in Comparative International Development 36 (1): 37- 65.
48. Marks, Gary, and Larry Diamond, 1992. Reexamining Democracy: Essays in Honor of Seymour Martin Lipset. Newbury Park, Calif.: Sage Publications.
49. Massam, Bryan H., and Robert Earl-Goulet. 1997. Environmental Nongovernmental Organizations in Central and Eastern Europe: Contributions to Civil Society. International Environmental Affairs 9 (2): 127- 147.
50. Matthews, Mary M. 2001. Cleaning Up Their Acts: Shifts of Environmental and Energy Policies in Pluralist and Corporatist States. Policy Studies Journal 29 (3): 478- 499.
51. Maybury-Lewis, David,. 2002. The Politics of Ethnicity: Indigenous Peoples in Latin American States. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. ed
52. Meadowcroft, James. 2004. Deliberative Democracy. In Environmental Governance Reconsidered: Challenges, Choices, and Opportunities, ed. Robert F. Durant, Daniel J. Fiorino, and Rosemary O ' Leary, 183- 217. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press.
53. Midlarsky, Manus I. 1998. Democracy and the Environment: An Empirical Assessment. Journal of Peace Research 35 (3): 341- 361.
54. Mumme, Stephen P., and Edward Korzetz. 1997. Democratization, Politics, and Environmental Reform in Latin America. In Latin American Environmental Policy in International Perspective, ed. Gordon J. MacDonald, Daniel L. Nelson, and Marc A. Stern, 40- 59. Boulder: Westview.
55. Munck, Gerardo, and Richard Snyder. 2007. Debating the Direction of Comparative Politics: An Analysis of Leading Journals. Comparative Political Studies 40 (1): 5- 31.
56. Neumayer, Eric. 2002. Do Democracies Exhibit Stronger International Environmental Commitment? A Cross-Country Analysis. Journal of Peace Research 39 (2): 139- 164.
57. Oldfield, Jon. 1999. The Environmental Impact of Transition: A Case Study of Moscow City. Geographical Journal 165 (2): 222- 231.
58. Ophuls, William. [1974] 2004. The Scarcity Society. In Green Planet Blues: Environmental Politics from Stockholm to Johannesburg, 3rd ed., ed. Ken Conca and Geoffrey D. Dabelko, 54- 60. Boulder: Westview Press.
59. Paehlke, Robert. 1995. Environmental Values for a Sustainable Society: The Democratic Challenge. In Greening Environmental Policy: The Politics of a Sustainable Future, ed. Frank Fischer and Michael Black, 129- 144. New York: St. Martin ' s Press.
60. Palacio Jim é nez, Mar í a Cecil í a. 2005. Compilaci ó n de Normas Nacionales e Regionales sobre Medio Ambiente desde 1980 en Bolivia y Diagn ó stico Sobre su Complimiento ante Autoridades Judiciales. La Paz, Bolivia: Centro Boliviano de Estudios Multidisciplinarios.
61. Pavl í nek, Petr, and John Pickles. 2004. Environmental Pasts/Environmental Futures in Post-Socialist Europe. Environmental Politics 13 (1): 237- 265.
62. Payne, Rodger A. 1995. Freedom and the Environment. Journal of Democracy 6 (3): 41- 55.
63. Pellegrini, Lorenzo, and Reyer Gerlagh. 2006. Corruption, Democracy, and Environmental Policy: An Empirical Contribution to the Debate. Journal of Environment & Development 15 (3): 332- 354.
64. Pratt, Lawrence, and Pascal O. Girot. 2002. Executive Profile for Regional Dialogue on the Environment: The Mesoamerican Sub-region. Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank.
65. Press, Daniel. 1994. Democratic Dilemmas in the Age of Ecology: Trees and Toxics in the American West. Durham: Duke University Press.
66. Ray, James L. 1995. Democracy and International Conflict: An Evaluation of the Democratic Peace Proposition. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.
67. Reid, Walter V., Osvaldo Lucon, Suani Teixeira Coelho, and Patricia Guardabassi. 2005. No Reason to Wait: The Benefits of Greenhouse Gas Reduction in S ã o Paulo and California. Menlo Park, Calif.: Hewlett Foundation.
68. Ribot, Jesse C. 1999. Decentralisation, Participation and Accountability in Sahelian Forestry: Legal Instruments of Political-Administrative Control. Africa 69 (1): 23- 65.
69. Roberts, J. Timmons, and Nikki D. Thanos. 2003. Trouble in Paradise: Globalization and Environmental Crises in Latin America. London: Routledge.
70. Russett, Bruce M. 1993. Grasping the Democratic Peace: Principles for a Post- Cold War World. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
71. Sawyer, Suzana. 2004. Crude Chronicles: Indigenous Politics, Multinational Oil, and Neoliberalism in Ecuador. Durham: Duke University Press.
72. Scruggs, Lyle. 2001. Is There Really a Link Between Neo-corporatism and Environmental Performance? Updated Evidence and New Data for the 1980s and 1990s. British Journal of Political Science 31 (4): 686- 692.
73. Silva, Eduardo. 1996- 1997. Democracy, Market Economics, and Environmental Policy in Chile. Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs 38 (4): 1- 33.
74. Steinberg, Paul F. 2001. Environmental Leadership in Developing Countries: Transnational Relations and Biodiversity Policy in Costa Rica and Bolivia. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
75. Steinberg, Paul F. 2005. From Public Concern to Policy Effectiveness: Civic Conservation in Developing Countries. Journal of International Wildlife Law and Policy 8 (4): 341- 365.
76. Van Cott, Donna Lee, 1994. Indigenous Peoples and Democracy in Latin America. New York: St. Martin ' s Press and the Inter-American Dialogue. ed.
77. Weber, Edward P. 2000. A New Vanguard for the Environment: Grass-Roots Ecosystem Management as a New Environmental Movement. Society & Natural Resources 13 (3): 237- 259.
78. Wettestad, J ø rgen. 2006. The Effectiveness of Environmental Policies. In Palgrave Advances in International Environmental Politics, ed. Michele M. Betsill, Kathryn Hochstetler, and Dimitris Stevis, 299- 328. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave MacMillan.
79. Whitefield Stephen., 2003. Russian Mass Attitudes Towards the Environment, 1993- 2001. Post-Soviet Affairs 19 (2): 95- 113.