Democratization, decentralization, and local environmental policy capacity: Hungary and Mexico

Social Science Journal

Volumn 40, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 249-268

  Assetto, Valerie J ^a   Hajba, Eva ^b   Mumme, Stephen P ^a  

^a Department of Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences   (United States)

^b BUDAPEST UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY AND ECONOMICS   (Hungary)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0037238027     PISSN: 03623319     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0362-3319(03)00007-7     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Bartus, G. (1997). Personal interview.
2. Ben-Elia, N. (1993). Introduction. Policy Studies Journal, 21, 74-81.
3. Bohm, A. (1994). Systemic change and local government in Hungary. Budapest: Institute for Political Science of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences.
4. Border Environment Cooperation Commission (BECC). (1998). Home-page for the BECC. On-line at http://www.cocef.interjuarez.com
5. Commission for Environmental Cooperation. (1999.) North American Agenda for Action, 1999-2001 Montreal: CEC.
6. CDLR, S. C. o. L. a. R. A. (1994). Structure and operation of local and regional democracy: Situation in 1993. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.
7. Coulson, A. (1995). From democratic centralism to local democracy. In A. Coulson (Ed.), Local government in Eastern Europe (pp. 1-22). Brookfield, VT: Edward Elgar Publishing Company.
8. Davey, K. (1995). Local government in Hungary. In A. Coulson (Ed.), Local government in Eastern Europe (pp. 57-75). Brookfield, VT: Edward Elgar Publishing Company.
9. Devas, N. (1995). Local government finance in Hungary: Issues and dilemmas. In A. Coulson (Ed.), Local government in Eastern Europe (pp. 214-237). Brookfield, VT: Edward Elgar Publishing Company.
10. Foltanyi, Z. (1997). Personal interview.
11. Foundation, T. N. F. (1996a). NGO news: A regional newsletter for non-governmental organizations (Vol. 2, pp. 4-6).
12. Foundation, T. N. F. (1996b). NGO news: A regional newsletter for non-governmental organizations (Vol. 2, pp. 1-5).
13. Hajdu, Z. (1993). Local government reform in Hungary. In R. J. Bennett (Ed.), Local government in the new Europe (pp. 209-224). London: Belhaven Press.
14. Ilonszki, G. (1990). Political participation in Hungary. In Strathclyde papers on government & politics (Vol. 76). Glasgow: University of Strathclyde.
15. Janicke, M., & Weidner, H. (1997). National environmental policies: A comparative study of capacity building. Berlin: Springer.
16. Ley general del equilibrio ecologico y la proteccion al ambiente. (1997). Mexico, DF: Editorial Porrua, Decimoquarto Edicion.
17. Martinez, S. (2000). Problematica ambiental de los municipios Sonorenses. Hermosillo, Son.: Red Fronteriza de Salud y Medio Ambiente, A.C., May.
18. Mumme, S. P. (2000). Sustainable development and environmental decentralization on the border: Some insights from Sonora. In L. Herzog (Ed.), Shared space: Rethinking the U.S.-Mexico border environment (pp. 101-128). La Jolla: Center for U.S.-Mexican Studies, University of California, San Diego.
19. OECD. (1998a). Environmental performance reviews: Mexico. Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.
20. OECD. (1998b). Decentralization and local infrastructure in Mexico: A new policy for development. Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.
21. OECD. (2000). Environmental performance reviews: Hungary. Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.
22. O'Toole, J., & Laurence, J. (1994). Local public administrative challenges in post-socialist Hungary. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 60, 291-304.
23. Pàl, T. (1997). Personal interview.
24. Pineda, N. (2001). Water supply performance, policy and politics in the Mexican border. Unpublished manuscript. Hermosillo, Son.: El Colegio de Sonora.
25. Raustiala, K. (1997). The participatory revolution in international environmental law. Harvard Environmental Law Review, 21, 537-575.
26. Review of the Economic Situation in Mexico (RESM). (2001). Reforming the state (Vol. 77, pp. 307-310).
27. Rodriguez, V. E. (1997). Decentralization in Mexico. Boulder: Westview Press.
28. Secretaria de Medio Ambiente, Recursos Naturales, y Pesca. (2000). Programa de Trabajo 2000. Mexico, DF: SEMARNAP [now SEMARNAT]. On-line at www.semarnap.gob.mx/programa2000/documento/capitulo3B.htm
29. Spalding, M. (2000). Addressing border environmental problems now and in the future: Border XXI and related efforts. In P. Ganster (Ed.), The U.S.-Mexican border environment (pp. 105-138). San Diego: SCERP Monograph No. 1, Southwest Center for Environmental Policy and Research.
30. Szirmai, V. (1998). Personal interview.
31. United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). (1996). U.S.-Mexico Border XXI framework document. Washington, DC: USEPA 160-R-96-003, October.
32. Vari, A. (1996). State-of-the-art in public participation in Hungary: The case of siting a spent fuel storage facility. Environmental pollution-ICEP.3, conference proceedings (Vol. 2). European Centre for Pollution Research.
33. Vari, A. (1998). Personal interview.
34. World Bank. (2000). World development report 1999-2000. New York: Oxford University Press.