Governance of air quality and stakeholder engagement: Lessons and experience from international cases

Governing the Air: The Dynamics of Science, Policy, and Citizen Interaction

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 293-319

  Forrester, John ^a,b   Hicks, Kevin ^a   Kuylenstierna, Johan ^a   Simon, Julie ^a   Snell, Carolyn ^a   Chadwick, Michael J ^c   Schwela, Dieter ^a   Emberson, Lisa ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF YORK   (United Kingdom)

^b York Centre for Complex Systems Analysis   (United Kingdom)

^c NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84894769662     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (45)

1. Air Quality Management Resource Centre. 2006. Consultation as Science Communication? The Case of Local Air Quality Management. Economic and Social Research Council Science in Society project report. Bristol: University of the West of England. Available at http://www.uwe.ac.uk/aqm/esrc.
2. Carpenter, Stephen, Carl Folke, Marten Scheffer, and Frances Westley. 2009. Resilience: Accounting for the Noncomputables. Ecology and Society 14 (1): article 13. Available at http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol14/iss1/art13.
3. Cinderby, Steve, and John Forrester. 2005. Facilitating the Local Governance of Air Pollution Using GIS for Participation. Applied Geography 25: 143 - 158.
4. Cinderby, Steve, and Laura Potts. 2007. Suspicious Cartographers: Some Realities of Research into Stakeholder Understanding of the Causes and Possible Prevention of Breast Cancer. Science & Public Policy 34 (5): 345 - 354.
5. Dorfman, Paul, Clare Beattie, Frank Burnet, Dave Gibbs, Jim Longhurst, Emma Weitkamp, and Nurul Leksmono. 2006. A Conceptual Model of the Role of Complex Science in Local Authority Consultations about Air Quality Management. Local Environment 11 (4): 399 - 419.
6. Dorfman, Paul, Nurul Leksmono, Jim Longhurst, Dave Gibbs, Frank Burnet, Emma Weitkamp, and Clare Beattie. 2006. Steps to Better Practice: Guidance for Local Authorities on LAQM Consultation. Bristol: University of the West of England.
7. Dovers, Stephen. 2005. Clarifying the Imperative of Integration Research for Sustainable Environmental Management. Journal of Research Practice 1 (2): manuscript1. Available at http://jrp.icaap.org/index.php/jrp/issue/view/2.
8. Duit, Andreas, and Victor Galaz. 2008. Governance and Complexity - Emerging Issues for Governance Theory. Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions 21 (3): 311 - 335.
9. Elliot Major, Lee. 2000. What Is Evidence Based Policy? The Edge (UK Economic and Social Research Council) 3: 20 - 21.
10. European Union. 2006. Consolidated Version of the Treaty Establishing the European Community. Official Journal of the European Union C 321: E1 - E331.
11. Folke, Carl, Thomas Hahn, Per Olsson, and Jon Norberg. 2005. Adaptive Governance of Social-Ecological Systems. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 30: 441 - 473.
12. Forrester, John. 1999. The Logistics of Public Participation in Environmental Assessment. International Journal of Environment and Pollution 11: 316 - 330.
13. Forrester, John. 2006. Science and Public Participation: The Democratisation of Science. In Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology, ed. George Ritzer, 4088 - 4091. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
14. Forrester, John, Laura Potts, Steve Cinderby, and Paul Rosen. 2002. Creating " Science ' s New Social Contract " ? Paper presented at the European Association for the Study of Science and Technology annual conference, York, UK, 31 July - 3 August.
15. Forrester, John, Åsa Swartling, and Kate Lonsdale. 2008. Stakeholder Engagement and the Work of SEI: An Empirical Study. Stockholm: Stockholm Environment Institute.
16. Freeman, R. Edward. 1984. Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Boston: Pitman.
17. Funtowicz, Silvio, and Jerome Ravetz. 1991. A New Scientific Methodology for Global Environmental Issues. In Ecological Economics: The Science and Management of Sustainability, ed. Robert Costanza, 137 - 152. New York: Columbia University Press.
18. Gibbons, Michael. 1999. Science ' s New Social Contract with Society. Nature 402 (supp.): c81 - c84.
19. Gibbons, Michael, Camille Limoges, Helga Nowotny, Simon Schwartzmann, Peter Scott, and Martin Trow. 1994. The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Society. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
20. Grennfelt, Peringe, Rolf Lidskog, Lars Lindau, Rob Mass, Frank Raes, Göran Sundqvist, and Jenny Arnell. 2006. Towards Robust European Air Pollution Policies: Constraints and Prospects for a Wider Dialogue between Scientists, Experts, Decision-makers, and Citizens. A Workshop Report. IVL Report no. B1671. Stockholm: Swedish Environmental Research Institute.
21. Hudson, John, and Stuart Lowe. 2004. Understanding the Policy Process: Analysing Welfare Policy and Practice. Bristol: Polity Press.
22. Kasperson, Roger. 2007. Foreword. In Environmental Policy Integration in Practice: Shaping Institutions for Learning, ed. Måns Nilsson and Katerina Eckerberg, xv - xvi. London: Earthscan.
23. Kates, Robert, William Clark, Robert Corell, J. Michael Hall, Carlo Jaeger, Ian Lowe, James McCarthy, et al. 2001. Sustainability Science. Science 292 (5517): 641 - 642.
24. Liberatore, Angela, and Silvio Funtowicz. 2003. " Democratising " Expertise, " Expertising " Democracy: What Does This Mean, and Why Bother? Science & Public Policy 30 (3): 146 - 150.
25. Lindblom, Charles. 1959. The Science of Muddling Through. Public Administration Review 19: 78 - 88.
26. Nilsson, Måns. 2007. Shaping Institutions for Learning. In Environmental Policy Integration in Practice: Shaping Institutions for Learning, ed. Måns Nilsson and Katerina Eckerberg, 163 - 168. London: Earthscan.
27. NSCA (National Society for Clean Air and Environmental Protection). 1999. Consultation for Local Air Quality Management: The How to Guide. Brighton, UK: NSCA.
28. Pateman, Carole. 1970. Participation and Democratic Theory. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
29. Petts, Judith, and Catherine Brooks. 2006. Expert Conceptualisations of the Role of Lay Knowledge in Environmental Decisionmaking: Challenges for Deliberative Democracy. Environment & Planning A 38 (6): 1045 - 1059.
30. Pielke, Roger. 2007. The Honest Broker: Making Sense of Science in Policy and Politics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
31. Plummer, Ryan. 2010. Looking forward from the Nexus of Research and Practice: Learning from Issues Emerging with Adaptive Co-Management. In Overcoming the Challenges of " Doing Participation " in Environment and Development, ed. John Forrester and Å sa Gerger Swartling, 21 - 27. Stockholm: Stockholm Environment Institute.
32. Plummer, Ryan, and Derek Armitage. 2007. Crossing Boundaries, Crossing Scales: The Evolution of Environment and Resource Co-Management. Geography Compass 1 (4): 838 - 849.
33. Schwela, Dieter, Gary Haq, Cornie Huizenga, Han Wha-jin, Herbert Fabian, and May Ajero. 2006. Urban Air Pollution in Asian Cities. London: Earthscan.
34. SEI, KEI, UNEP, WHO, and CAI - Asia (Stockholm Environment Institute, Korea Environment Institute, United Nations Environment Program, World Health Organization, and Clean Air Initiative for Asian Cities - Asian Development Bank). 2004. A Strategic Framework for Air Quality Management in Asia. Stockholm: SEI, KEI, UNEP, WHO, and CAI - Asia.
35. Siebenhüner, Bernd. 2002. How Do Scientific Assessments Learn? A Comparative Study of the IPCC and LRTAP. Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs Discussion Paper 2002-05. Cambridge, MA: Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University.
36. Stirling, Andy. 2005. Opening Up or Closing Down? Analysis, Participation, and Power in the Social Appraisal of Technology. In Science and Citizens: Globalization and the Challenges of Engagement, ed. Melissa Leach, Ian Scoones, and Brian Wynne, 218 - 231. London: Zed Books.
37. Stringer, Lindsay, Andy Dougill, Evan Fraser, Klaus Hubacek, Christina Prell, and Mark Reed. 2006. Unpacking " Participation " in the Adaptive Management of Social - Ecological Systems: A Critical Review. Ecology and Society 11(2): article 39. Available at http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss2/art39.
38. Tress, Bärbel, Gunther Tress, and Gary Fry. 2005. Integrative Studies on Rural Landscapes: Policy Expectations and Research Practice. Landscape and Urban Planning 70: 177 - 191.
39. UK Govt. (United Kingdom Government). 1995. The Environment Act 1995. Available at http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1995/25/contents.
40. United Nations. 1992. Agenda 21: The United Nations ' Programme of Action from Rio. United Nations, New York. Available at http://www.un.org/esa/dsd/ agenda21/.
41. Webster, Andrew. 2007. Crossing Boundaries: Social Science in the Policy Room. Science, Technology, & Human Values 32 (4): 458 - 478.
42. Wilsdon, James, and Rebecca Willis. 2004. See-Through Science: Why Public Engagement Needs to Move Upstream. London: Demos.
43. Yearley, Steven, Steve Cinderby, John Forrester, Peter Bailey, and Paul Rosen. 2003. Participatory Modelling and the Local Governance of the Politics of UK Air Pollution: A Three-City Case Study. Environmental Values 12: 247 - 262.
44. Ziman, John. 1978. Reliable Knowledge: An Exploration of the Grounds for Belief in Science. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
45. Ziman, John. 2000. Real Science: What It Is, and What It Means. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.