Applications of theories and models of choice and decision-making under conditions of uncertainty in travel behavior research

Travel Behaviour and Society

Volumn 1, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 79-90

  Rasouli, Soora ^a   Timmermans, Harry ^a  

^a EINDHOVEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84894754938     PISSN: 2214367X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tbs.2013.12.001     Document Type: Article

References (75)

1. Allais M. Le Comportement de l'Homme Rationnel devant le Risque: Critique des Postulats et Axiomes de l'Ecole Americaine. Econometrica 1953, 503-546.
2. Arentze T.A., Hofman F., van Mourik H., Timmermans H.J.P., Wets G.P.M. Using decision tree induction systems for modeling space-time behavior. Geogr. Anal. 2000, 32:52-72.
3. Arrow, K.J., 1965. The theory of risk aversion. In: Aspects of the Theory of Risk Bearing. Yrjo Jahnssonin Saatio, Helsinki. Reprinted in: Essays in the Theory of Risk Bearing. Markham, Chicago 90-109 (1971). ISBN: 0841020019.
4. Avineri E., 2009. The fuzzy meaning of reference-based perceptions in travel choice modeling. In: Proceedings 88th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
5. Avineri, E., Bovy. P.H.L., 2008. Parameter identification of prospect theory model for travel choice analysis. In: Proceedings 87th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
6. Avineri, E., Prashker, J.N., 2004. violations of expected utility theory in route-choice stated-preferences: the certainty effect and inflating of small probabilities. In: Proceedings 83rd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
7. Avineri E., Prashker J.N. Sensitivity to travel time variability: travellers' learning perspective. Transp. Res. C 2005, 13:157-183.
8. Avineri E., Prashker J.N. The impact of travel time information on travellers' learning under uncertainty. Transportation 2006, 33:393-408.
9. Barron G., Erev I. Small feedback-based decisions and their limited correspondence to description-based decisions. J. Behav. Decis. Making 2003, 16:215-233.
10. Batty M. Urban Modelling 1976, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
11. Beck, M., Chorus, C., Rose, J.M., Hensher, D.A., 2013. Random regret and random utility in the household purchase of a motor vehicle. In: Proceedings Annual TRB Meeting, Washington, DC, USA.
12. Ben-Akiva M., Lerman S. Discrete Choice Analysis 1985, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA.
13. Ben-Elia E., Erev I., Shiftan Y. The combined effect of information and experience on drivers' route-choice behavior. Transportation 2008, 35:165-177.
14. Ben-Elia, E., Ishaq, R., Shiftan, Y., 2012. "If only I had taken the other road...": Regret, risk and reinforced learning in informed route-choice. Transportation, online, 25 pp.
15. Bhat C.R. A multiple discrete-continuous extreme value model: formulation and application to discretionary time-use decisions. Transp. Res. B 2005, 39(8):679-707.
16. Chew, S., MacCrimmon, K., 1979. Alpha-nu choice theory: A generalization of expected utility theory. University of British Columbia, Faculty of Commerce and Business Administration, Working Paper No. 669, Vancouver.
17. Chorus C.G. A new model of random regret minimization. Eur. J. Transp. Infrastruct. Res. 2011, 10:181-196.
18. Chorus C.G., Arentze T.A., Timmermans H.J.P. A random regret-minimization model of travel choice. Transp. Res. B 2008, 42:1-18.
19. Chorus, C.G., Arentze, T.A., Timmermans, H.J.P., 2008b. A comparison of regret-minimization and utility-maximization in the context of travel mode-choices. In: Proceedings 87th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
20. Chorus, C.G., Bierlaire, M., 2013. Travel choice models that generate preferences for compromise alternatives: an empirical comparison. In: Proceedings 92nd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
21. Chorus, C.G., Rose, J., Hensher, D.A., 2013. Hybrid models of random utility maximization and random regret minimization: results from two empirical studies. In: Proceedings Annual Meeting TRB, Washington, DC.
22. Connors R.D., Sumalee A. A network equilibrium model with travellers' perception of stochastic travel times. Transp. Res. B 2009, 43(6):614-624.
23. David E. Regret in decision making under uncertainty. Oper. Res. 1982, 30:961-981.
24. De Lapparent M. Attitude toward risk of time loss in travel activity and air route choices. J. Intell. Transp. Syst. Technol. Planning Operations 2010, 14:166-178.
25. De Palma, A., Lindsey, R., Picard, N., 2007. Congestion, Risk Aversion and the Value of Information. Working Paper 2, University of Alberta, Edmonton.
26. De Palma A., Lindsey R., Picard N. Risk aversion, the value of information, and traffic equilibrium. Transp. Sci. 2012, 46:1-26.
27. Erev I., Ert E., Yechiam E. Loss aversion, diminishing sensitivity, and the effect of experience on repeated decisions. J. Behav. Decis. Making 2008, 21(5):575-597.
28. Fishburn P.C. Non-transitive measurable utility. J. Math. Psychol. 1982, 26(1):31-67.
29. Fujii S., Kitamura R. Drivers' mental representation of travel time and departure time choice in uncertain traffic network conditions. Networks Spatial Econom. 2004, 4:243-256.
30. Gao S., Frejinger E., Ben-Akiva M. Adaptive route choice models in stochastic time-dependent networks. Transp. Res. Rec. 2008, 2085:136-143.
31. Gao S., Frejinger E., Ben-Akiva M. Adaptive route choices in risky traffic networks: a prospect theory approach. Transportat. Res. C 2010, 18:727-740.
32. Goldstein W.M., Einhorn H.J. Expression theory and the preference reversal phenomenon. Psychol. Rev. 1987, 94:236-254.
33. Han, Q., Dellaert, B., van Raaij, F., Timmermans, H.J.P., 2005. Integrating prospect theory and stackelberg games to model strategic dyad behavior of information providers and travelers: theory and numerical simulations. In: Proceedings 83rd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
34. Han, Q., Timmermans, H.J.P., Dellaert, B., van Raaij, F., 2008. Route choice under uncertainty: effects of recommendation. In: Proceedings 87th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
35. Hensher D.A. Applied Discrete Choice Modelling 1981, Wiley, New York.
36. Hey J.D., Chris O. Investigating generalizations of expected utility theory using experimental data. Econometrica 1994, 62:1291-1326.
37. Hess S., Stathopoulos A., Daly A. Allowing for heterogeneous decision rules in discrete choice models: an approach and four case studies. Transportation 2012, 39:565-591.
38. Hu, J., Mehrotra, S., 2012. Robust decision making using a risk-averse utility set. working paper, Department of Industrial Engineering and Management Sciences, Northwestern University.
39. Jou R.C., Kitamura R. Commuter Departure Time Choice: A Reference-Point Approach 2002, Proceedings EWGT, Bari, Italy.
40. Kahneman D., Tversky A. Prospect theory: an analysis of decisions under risk. Econometrica 1979, 47:263-291.
41. Katsikopoulos K.V., Duse-Anthony Y., Fisher D.L., Duffy S.A. The framing of drivers' route choices when travel time information is provided under varying degrees of cognitive load. Hum. Factors 2000, 42:470-481.
42. Katsikopoulos K.V., Duse-Anthony Y., Fisher D.L., Duffy S.A. Risk attitude reversals in drivers' route choice when range of travel time information is provided. Hum. Factors 2002, 44:466-473.
43. Li Z., Hensher D.A. Prospect theoretic contributions in understanding traveller behaviour: a review and some comments. Transp. Policy 2011, 31:97-115.
44. Liu, X., Polak, J.W., 2007. Nonlinearity and the specification of attitudes towards risk in discrete choice models. In: Proceedings 86th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
45. Lo H.K., Luo X.W., Siu B.W.Y. Degradable transport network: travel time budget of travelers with heterogeneous risk aversion. Transp. Res. B 2006, 40(9):792-806.
46. Loomes G., Sugden R. Regret theory: an alternative theory of rational choice under uncertainty. The Econ. J. 1982, 92:805-824.
47. Loomes G., Sugden R. Some implications of a more general form of regret theory. J. Econ. Theor. 1987, 41(2):270-287.
48. Luce R.D. Individual choice behavior: a theoretical analysis 1959, Wiley, New York.
49. Machina M.J. Choice under uncertainty: problems solved and unsolved. J. Econ. Perspect. 1987, 1:121-154.
50. Masiero L., Hensher D.A. Shift of reference point and implications on behavioral reaction to gains and losses. Transportation 2011, 38:249-271.
51. McFadden D. Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behaviour. Frontiers in Econometrics 1974, 105-142. Academic Press, New York. P. Zarembka (Ed.).
52. Neumann V., Morgenstern O. Theory of Games and Economic Behavior 1947, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ. second ed.
53. Palma, A. de., Lindsey, R., Picard, N. 2008. Congestion, risk aversion and the value of information. In: Proceedings 87th Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting, Washington, DC.
54. Polak, J.W., Hess, S., Liu, X., 2008. Characterizing heterogeneity in attitudes to risk in expected utility models of mode and departure time choice. In: Proceedings 87th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
55. Prelec D. The probability weighting function. Econometrica 1998, 66:497-527.
56. Quiggin J. A theory of anticipated utility. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 1982, 3:323-343.
57. Ramos G.M., Daamen W., Hoogendoorn S.P. Expected utility theory, prospect theory, and regret theory compared for prediction of route choice behavior. Transport. Res. Rec. 2011, 2011(2230):19-28.
58. Rasouli S., Timmermans H.J.P. Uncertainty in travel demand forecasting models: literature review and research agenda. Transp. Lett. 2012, 4:55-73.
59. Rasouli S., Timmermans H.J.P. Uncertainty, uncertainty, uncertainty: revisiting the study of dynamic complex spatial systems. Environ. Planning A 2012, 44:1781-1784.
60. Schwanen, T., 2007. The 'When' dimension of coupling constraints. In: Proceedings 86th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
61. Schwanen, T., Ettema, D.F., 2007. Coping with unreliable transportation when collecting children: examining parents' behavior with cumulative prospect theory. In: Proceedings 86th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
62. Senbil M., Kitamura R. Reference points in commuter departure time choice: a prospect theoretic test of alternative decision frames. Intell. Transp. Syst. 2004, 8:19-31.
63. Senbil, M., Kitamura, R., 2006. Valuing expressways under time pressures. In: Proceedings 85th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
64. Stott H.P. Cumulative prospect theory's functional menagerie. J Risk Uncertainty 2006, 32:101-130.
65. Sugden R. Alternatives to expected utility. Handbook of Utility Theory 2004, vol. 2:685-755. Kluwer, Dordrecht.
66. Sun Z., Arentze T.A., Timmermans H.J.P. A heterogeneous latent class model of activity rescheduling, route choice and information acquisition decisions under multiple uncertain events. Transp. Res. C 2012, 25:45-60.
67. Timmermans H.J.P., Arentze T.A., Joh C.H. Modeling learning and evolutionary adaptation processes in activity settings: theory and numerical simulations. Transp. Res. Rec. 2000, 1718:27-33.
68. Train K. Discrete Choice Models with Simulation 2003, Cambridge University Press, New York.
69. Tversky A., Kahneman D. Advances in prospect theory: cumulative representation of uncertainty. J. Risk Uncertain. 1992, 5:297-323.
70. Van de Kaa E.J. Applicability of an extended prospect theory to travel behaviour research: a meta-analysis. Transp. Rev. 2010, 30:771-804.
71. Walker J., Ben-Akiva M.E. Generalized random utility model. Math. Soc. Sci. 2002, 43:303-343.
72. Wilson A.G. Urban and Regional Models in Geography and Planning 1974, Wiley, New York.
73. Xu H., Lou Y., Yin Y., Zhou J. A prospect-based user equilibrium model with endogenous reference points and its application in congestion pricing. Transp. Res. Part B 2011, 45(2):311-328.
74. Xu H., Zhou J., Xu W. A decision-making rule for modeling travelers' route choice behavior based on cumulative prospect theory. Transp. Res. Part C 2011, 19(2):218-228.
75. Zhang, J., Yu, B., Timmermans, H.J.P., 2013. Extending relative utility model with multiple reference points to incorporate asymmetric, non-linear response curvature. In: Proceedings 92nd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.