Developing an Understanding of Chemistry: A case study of one Swedish student's rich conceptualisation for making sense of upper secondary school chemistry

International Journal of Science Education

Volumn 36, Issue 7, 2014, Pages 1107-1136

  Adbo, Karina ^a   Taber, Keith S ^b  

^a LINNAEUS UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Case study; Conceptual development; Intuitive ideas; Learning progression; P prims

Indexed keywords

EID: 84894654120     PISSN: 09500693     EISSN: 14645289     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09500693.2013.844869     Document Type: Article

References (75)

1. Adbo, K., & Taber, K. S. (2009). Learners' mental models of the particle nature of matter: a study of 16 year-old Swedish science students. International Journal of Science Education, 31(6), 757-786.
2. Andersson, B. (1986). The experiential gestalt of causation: A common core to pupils' preconceptions in science. European Journal of Science Education, 8(2), 155-171. doi: 10.1080/0140528860080205
3. Andersson, B. (1990). Pupils' conceptions of matter and its transformations (age 12-16). Studies in Science Education, 18, 53-85. doi: 10.1080/03057269008559981
4. Andersson, S., Sonesson, A., Stålhandske, B., & Tullberg, A. (2003). Gymnasiekemi A. Falköping: Liber AB.
5. Ben-Zvi, R., Bat-Sheva, E., & Silberstein, J. (1986). Is an atom of copper malleable? Journal of Chemical Education, 63(1), 64-66. doi: 10.1021/ed063p64
6. Brook, A., Briggs, H., & Driver, R. (1984). Aspects of secondary students' understanding of the particulate nature of matter. Leeds: Centre for Studies in Science and Mathematics Education, University of Leeds.
7. Carey, S. (2009). The origin of concepts. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
8. Claxton, G. (1993). Minitheories: A preliminary model for learning science. In P. J. Black & A. M. Lucas (Eds.), Children's informal ideas in science (pp. 45-61). London: Routledge.
9. Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2000). Research methods in education (5th ed.). London: Routledge-Falmer.
10. diSessa, A. A. (1993). Towards an epistemology of physics. Cognition and Instruction, 10(2&3), 105-225. doi: 10.1080/07370008.1985.9649008
11. diSessa, A. A., Gillespie, N. M., & Esterly, J. B. (2004). Coherence versus fragmentation in the development of the concept of force. Cognitive Science: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 28(6), 843-900. doi: 10.1207/s15516709cog2806_1
12. Driver, R. (1989). Students' conceptions and the learning of science. International Journal of Science Education, 11(Special Issue), 481-490. doi: 10.1080/0950069890110501
13. Driver, R., & Erickson, G. (1983). Theories-in-action: Some theoretical and empirical issues in the study of students' conceptual frameworks in science. Studies in Science Education, 10, 37-60. doi: 10.1080/03057268308559904
14. Duit, R. (1991). Students' conceptual frameworks: Consequences for learning science. In S. M. Glynn, R. H. Yeany, & B. K. Britton (Eds.), The psychology of learning science (pp. 65-85). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
15. Duit, R. (2009). Bibliography-students' and teachers' conceptions and science education. Kiel. Retrieved from http://www.ipn.uni-kiel.de/aktuell/stcse/stcse.html
16. Fensham, P. J., Gunstone, R. F., & White, R. T. (1994). The content of science: A constructivist approach to its teaching and learning. London: Falmer Press.
17. Gabel, D. L. (1993). Use of the particle nature of matter in developing conceptual understanding. Journal of Chemical Education, 70(3), 193-194. doi: 10.1021/ed070p193
18. Garnett, P. J., Garnett, P. J., & Hackling, M. W. (1995). Students' alternative conceptions in chemistry: A review of research and implication for teaching and learning. Studies in Science Education, 25, 69-95. doi: 10.1080/03057269508560050
19. Gilbert, J. K., Osborne, R. J., & Fensham, P. J. (1982). Children's science and its consequences for teaching. Science Education, 66(4), 623-633. doi: 10.1002/sce.3730660412
20. Gilbert, J. K., & Treagust, D. F. (Eds.). (2009). Multiple representations in chemical education. Dordrecht: Springer.
21. Gilbert, J. K., & Watts, D. M. (1983). Concepts, misconceptions and alternative conceptions: Changing perspectives in science education. Studies in Science Education, 10, 61-98. doi: 10.1080/03057268308559905
22. Gilbert, J. K., Watts, M. D., & Osbourne, R. J. (1985). Eliciting students views using an interview-about-instances technique. In L. West & L. Pines (Eds.), Cognitive structure and conceptual change (pp. 11-26). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
23. Glasersfeld, E. v. (1989). Cognition, construction of knowledge, and teaching. Synthese, 80(1), 121-140. doi: 10.1007/BF00869951
24. Griffiths, A. K., & Preston, K. R. (1992). Grade-12 students' misconceptions relating to fundamental characteristics of atoms and molecules. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(6), 611-628. doi: 10.1002/tea.3660290609
25. Hammer, D. (2004). The variability of student reasoning, lecture 3: Manifold cognitive resources. In E. F. Redish & M. Vicentini (Eds.), Research on physics education (pp. 321-340). Bologna/Amsterdam: Italian Physical Society/IOS Press.
26. Harrison, A. G., & Treagust, D. F. (2000). Learning about atoms, molecules, and chemical bonds: A case study of multiple-model use in grade 11 chemistry. Science Education, 84, 352-381. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(200005)84:3<352::AID-SCE3>3.0.CO;2-J
27. Harrison, A. G., & Treagust, D. F. (2002). The particulate nature of matter: Challenges in understanding the submicroscopic world. In J. K. Gilbert, O. de Jong, R. Justi, D. F. Treagust & J. H. Van Driel (Eds.), Chemical education: Towards research-based practice (pp. 189-212). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
28. Jensen, W. B. (1995, August). Logic, history and the teaching of chemistry. Text of the keynote lectures, given at the 57th annual summer conference of the New England Association of Chemistry Teachers, Sacred Heart University, Fairfield, CT.
29. Johnstone, A. H. (1982). Macro- and microchemistry [Notes and correspondence]. School Science Review, 64(227), 377-379.
30. Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1996). Beyond modularity: A developmental perspective on cognitive science. Cambridge: MIT Press.
31. Kind, V. (2004). Beyond appearances: Students' misconceptions about basic chemical ideas (2nd ed.). London: Royal Society of Chemistry.
32. Kvale, S. (1997). Den kvalitativa forskningsintervjun. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
33. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to Western thought. New York, NY: Basic Books.
34. Margel, H., Eylon, B.-S., & Scherz, Z. (2008). A longitudinal study of junior high school students' conceptions of the structure of materials. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(1), 132-152. doi: 10.1002/tea.20214
35. Mortimer, E. F., & Scott, P. H. (2003). Meaning making in secondary science classrooms. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
36. Novak, J. D. (1990). Concept mapping: A useful tool for science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27(10), 937-949. doi: 10.1002/tea.3660271003
37. Nussbaum, J., & Novick, S. (1982). Alternative frameworks, conceptual conflict and accommodation: Toward a principled teaching strategy. Instructional Science, 11, 183-200. doi: 10.1007/BF00414279
38. Petri, J., & Niedderer, H. (1998). A learning pathway in high-school level quantum atomic physics. International Journal of Science Education, 20(9), 1075-1088. doi: 10.1080/0950069980200905
39. Piaget, J. (1929/1973). The child's conception of the world. (J. Tomlinson & A. Tomlinson, Trans.). St. Albans: Granada.
40. Piaget, J., & Garcia, R. (1989). Psychogenesis and the history of science (H. Feider, Trans.). New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
41. Pintrich, P. R., Marx, R. W., & Boyle, R. A. (1993). Beyond cold conceptual change: The role of motivational beliefs and classroom contextual factors in the process of conceptual change. Review of Educational Research, 63(2), 167-199. doi: 10.3102/00346543063002167
42. Pope, M. L., & Denicolo, P. (1986). Intuitive theories-a researcher's dilemma: Some practical methodological implications. British Educational Research Journal, 12(2), 153-166. doi: 10.1080/0141192860120205
43. Renström, L., Andersson, B. r., & Marton, F. (1990). Students' conceptions of matter. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 555-569. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.82.3.555
44. Resnick, M. (1996). Beyond the centralized mindset. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 5(1), 1-22. doi: 10.1207/s15327809jls0501_1
45. Robson, C. (2002). Real world research: A resource for social scientists and practitioner researchers (2nd ed.). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
46. Scott, P. H. (1992). Pathways in learning science: A case study of the development of one student's ideas relating to the structure of matter. In R. Duit, F. Goldberg, & H. Niedderer (Eds.), Research in physics learning: Theoretical issues and empirical studies (pp. 203-224). Kiel: Institut für die Pädagogik der Naturwissenschraften.
47. Sjøberg, S. (2010). Constructivism and learning. In E. Baker, B. McGaw, & P. Peterson (Eds.), International encyclopaedia of education (3rd ed., pp. 485-490). Oxford: Elsevier.
48. Solomon, J. (1993). Four frames for a field. In P. J. Black & A. M. Lucas (Eds.), Children's informal ideas in science (pp. 1-19). London: Routledge.
49. Smith, J. P., diSessa, A. A., & Roschelle, J. (1993). Misconceptions reconceived: A constructivist analysis of knowledge in transition. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3(2), 115-163. doi: 10.1207/s15327809jls0302_1
50. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
51. Taber, K. S. (1995). Development of student understanding: A case study of stability and lability in cognitive structure. Research in Science & Technological Education, 13(1), 87-97.
52. Taber, K. S. (1998). Case studies and generalisability-grounded theory and research in science education. International Journal of Science Education, 22(5), 469-487.
53. Taber, K. S. (2000). Case studies and generalisability-grounded theory and research in science education. International Journal of Science Education, 22(5), 469-487.
54. Taber, K. S. (2002). Chemical misconceptions-Prevention, diagnosis and cure: Theoretical background (Vol. 1). London: Royal Society of Chemistry.
55. Taber, K. S. (2003a). Lost without trace or not brought to mind?-a case study of remembering and forgetting of college science. Chemistry Education: Research and Practice, 4(3), 249-277.
56. Taber, K. S. (2003b). Mediating mental models of metals: acknowledging the priority of the learner's prior learning. Science Education, 87, 732-758.
57. Taber, K. S. (2009). Progressing science education: Constructing the scientific research programme into the contingent nature of learning science. Dordrecht: Springer.
58. Taber, K. S. (2013a). Revisiting the chemistry triplet: drawing upon the nature of chemical knowledge and the psychology of learning to inform chemistry education. Chemistry Education Research and Practice. doi:10.1039/C3RP00012E
59. Taber, K. S. (2013b). Classroom-based research and evidence-based practice: An introduction (2nd ed.). London: Sage.
60. Taber, K. S. (Forthcoming). Student thinking and learning in science: Perspectives on the nature and development of learners' ideas. London: Routledge.
61. Taber, K. S., & Tan, K. C. D. (2007). Exploring learners' conceptual resources: Singapore A level students' explanations in the topic of ionisation energy. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 5, 375-392.
62. Taber, K. S., & García Franco, A. (2010). Learning processes in chemistry: Drawing upon cognitive resources to learn about the particulate structure of matter. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 19(1), 99-142.
63. Taber, K. S., & Adbo, K. (2013). Developing chemical understanding in the explanatory vacuum: Swedish high school students' use of an anthropomorphic conceptual framework to make sense of chemical phenomena. In G. Tsaparlis & H. Sevian (Eds.), Concepts of matter in science education (pp. 347-370). Dordrecht: Springer.
64. Talanquer, V. (2006). Common sense chemistry: A model for understanding students' alternative conceptions. Journal of Chemical Education, 83(5), 811-816. doi: 10.1021/ed083p811
65. Talanquer, V. (2009). On cognitive constraints and learning progressions: The case of 'structure of matter'. International Journal of Science Education, 31(15), 2123-2136. doi: 10.1080/09500690802578025
66. Talanquer, V. (2011). Macro, submicro, and symbolic: The many faces of the chemistry 'triplet'. International Journal of Science Education, 33(2), 179-195. doi: 10.1080/09500690903386435
67. Talmy, L. (1988). Force dynamics in language and cognition. Cognitive Science, 12(1), 49-100. doi: 10.1207/s15516709cog1201_2
68. Tiberghien, A. (2008). Students' conceptions: Culturing conceptions. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 3(2), 283-229. doi: 10.1007/s11422-008-9102-4
69. Toulmin, S. (1972). Human understanding: The collective use and evolution of concepts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
70. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
71. Watts, M., & Gilbert, J. K. (1983). Enigmas in school science: Students' conceptions for scientifically associated words. Research in Science and Technological Education, 1(2), 161-171. doi: 10.1080/0263514830010204
72. Watts, M., & Taber, K. S. (1996). An explanatory gestalt of essence: students' conceptions of the 'natural' in physical phenomena. International Journal of Science Education, 18(8), 939-954.
73. White, R. T., & Gunstone, R. F. (1992). Probing understanding. London: Taylor and Francis.
74. Wightman, T., Green, P., & Scott, P. (1986). The construction of meaning and conceptual change in classroom settings: Case studies on the particulate nature of matter. Leeds: Centre for Studies in Science and Mathematics Education, University of Leeds.
75. Wilensky, U., & Resnick, M. (1999). Thinking in levels: A dynamic systems approach to making sense of the world. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 8(1), 3-19. doi: 10.1023/A:1009421303064