50 years of inordinate fondness

Systematic Biology

Volumn 63, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 251-256

  Bokma, Folmer ^a   Baek, Seung Ki ^a   Minnhagen, Petter ^a  

^a UMEÅ UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; BIODIVERSITY; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; PHYLOGENY; REVIEW;

ANIMALS; BIODIVERSITY; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PHYLOGENY;

EID: 84894573926     PISSN: 10635157     EISSN: 1076836X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/sysbio/syt067     Document Type: Review

References (38)

1. Aldous D.J. 2001. Stochastic models and descriptive statistics for phylogenetic trees, from Yule to today. Stat. Sci. 16:23-34.
2. Alfaro M.E., Santini F., Brock C., Alamillo H., Dornburg A., Rabosky D.L., Carnevale G., Harmon L.J. 2009. Nine exceptional radiations plus high turnover explain species diversity in jawed vertebrates. PNAS. 106:13410-13414.
3. Baek S.K., Bernhardsson S., Minnhagen P. 2011a. Zipf's law unzipped. New J. Phys. 13:043004.
4. Baek S.K., Minnhagen P., Kim B.J. 2011b. The ten thousand Kims. New J. Phys. 13:073036.
5. Bailey N.T.J. 1964. The elements of stochastic processes with applications to the natural sciences.New York: John Wiley.
6. Bininda-Emonds O.R.P., Cardillo M., Jones K.E., MacPhee R.D.E., Beck R.M.D., Grenyer R., Price S.A., Vos R.A., Gittleman J.L., Purvis A. 2007. The delayed rise of present-day mammals. Nature. 446:507-512.
7. Burlando B. 1990. The fractal dimension of taxonomic systems. J. Theor. Biol. 146:99-114.
8. Chamberlin J.C. 1924. Concerning the hollow curve of distribution. Am. Nat. 58:350-374.
9. Dial K.P., Marzluff J.M. 1989. Nonrandom diversificaton within taxonomic assemblages. Syst. Zool. 38:26-37.
10. Farrell B.D. 1998. "Inordinate fondness" explained: why are there so many beetles? Science. 281:555-559.
11. Foote M., Hunter J.P., Janis C.M., Sepkoski J.J.J. 1999. Evolutionary and preservational constraints on origins of biological groups: divergence times of eutherian mammals. Science. 283:1310-1314.
12. Frost D.R. 2013. Amphibian Species of the World: an online reference. New York: American Museum of Natural History. Available from: URL http://research.amnh.org/vz/herpetology/amphibia/(last accessed November 6, 2013)
13. Gould S.J. 1993. Nat. Hist. 102:4.
14. Harte J. 2011. Maximum entropy and ecology: a theory of abundance, distribution, and energetics. New York, USA: Oxford Univ. Press.
15. Hubbell S.P. 2001. The unified neutral theory of biodiversity and biogeography. Princeton, USA: Princeton Univ. Press.
16. Hutchinson G.E. 1959. Homage to Santa Rosalia or Why are there so many kinds of animals? Am. Nat. 93:145-159.
17. Jaynes E. T. 1957. Information theory and statistical mechanics. Phys. Rev. 106:620-630.
18. Jaynes E. T. 2003. Probability Theory: the logic of science. New York, USA: Cambridge Univ. Press.
19. Kendall D.G. 1948.Onthe generalized "birth-and-death" process. Ann. Math. Stat. 19:1-15.
20. Kendall D.G. 1966. Branching processes since 1873. J. Lond. Math. Soc. 41:385-406.
21. Mayhew P.J. 2002. Shifts in hexapod diversification and what Haldane could have said. Proc. B. 269:967-969.
22. Minelli A., Fusco G., Sartori S. 1991. Self-similarity in biological classifications. Biosystems. 26:89-97.
23. Minnhagen P. 2011. Just and unjust distributions. Physcis Today. Available from: URL www.physicstoday.org/daily-edition/PT.4.0595 (last accessed November 6, 2013)
24. Nee S., Mooers A.O., Harvey P.H. 1992. Tempo and mode of evolution revealed from molecular phylogenies. PNAS. 89:8322-8326.
25. Phillimore A.B., Price T.D. 2008. Density-dependent cladogenesis in birds. PLoS Biol. 6:483-489.
26. Platnick N.I. 2011. The world spider catalog. New York: American Museum of Natural History. Available from: URL http://research. amnh.org/iz/spiders/ catalog/(last accessed November 6, 2013).
27. Raup D.M., Gould S.J., Schopf T.J.M., Simberloff D.S. 1973. Stochastic models of phylogeny and the evolution of diversity. J. Geology. 81:525-542.
28. Ricklefs R.E. 2003. Global diversification rates of passerine birds. Proc. B. 270:2285-2291.
29. Scotland R.W., Sanderson M.J. 2004. The significance of few versus many in the tree of life. Science. 303:643.
30. Sibley C.G., Ahlquist J.E. 1990. Phylogeny and classification of birds. New Haven: Yale Univ. Press.
31. Sibley C.G., Monroe B.L. 1990. Distribution and taxonomy of birds of the world. New Haven: Yale Univ. Press.
32. Stadler T. 2010. Sampling-through-time in birth-death trees. J. Theor. Biol. 267:396-404.
33. Stevens P.F. 2001. Angiosperm phylogeny website. St.Louis: Missouri Botanical Gardens. Available from: URL http://www.mobot.org/mobot/research/ apweb/(last accessed November 6, 2013).
34. Wilkinson B.H. 2011. On taxonomic membership. Paleobiology. 37:519-536.
35. Willis J.C. 1922. Age and area. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
36. Wilson D.E., Reeder D.M. 1993. Mammal species of the world: a taxonomic and geographic reference. Washington: Smithsonian Institution Press.
37. Yoder J.B., Clancey E., Des Roches S., Eastman J.M., Gentry L., Godsoe, W., Hagey T.J., Jochimsen D., Oswald B.P., Robertson J., Sarver B.A.J., Schenk J.J., Spear S.F., Harmon L.J. 2010. Ecological opportunity and the origin of adaptive radiations. J. Evol. Biol. 23: 1581-1596.
38. Yule G.U. 1925. A mathematical theory of evolution, based on the conclusions of Dr. J. C. Willis. F.R.S. Phil. Trans. B. 213:21-23.