Chemical characterization of atmospheric particulate matter in Delhi, India, part II: Source apportionment studies using PMF 3.0

Sustainable Environment Research

Volumn 23, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 295-306

  Tiwari, Suresh ^a   Pervez, Shamsh ^b   Cinzia, Perrino ^c   Bisht, Deewan Singh ^a   Kumar, Atul ^a   Chate, Dilip ^a  

^a INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TROPICAL METEOROLOGY   (India)

^b PT RAVISHANKAR SHUKLA UNIVERSITY   (India)

^c CNR Institute of Atmospheric Pollution   (Italy)

Author keywords

Abstract; Chemical composition; Factor analysis; PMF 3.0; Source apportionment; UNMIX 6.0

Indexed keywords

ABSTRACTING; AEROSOLS; CHEMICAL ANALYSIS; CHLORINE COMPOUNDS; FACTOR ANALYSIS; FACTORIZATION; ROADS AND STREETS; SILICON;

ATMOSPHERIC PARTICULATE MATTER; CHEMICAL CHARACTERIZATION; CHEMICAL COMPOSITIONS; CHEMICAL CONSTITUENTS; PMF 3.0; POSITIVE MATRIX FACTORIZATION; SOURCE APPORTIONMENT; UNMIX 6.0;

PARTICLES (PARTICULATE MATTER);

EID: 84894543585     PISSN: 24682039     EISSN: 24682039     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Perrino, C., S. Tiwari, M. Catrambone, S.D. Torre, E. Rantica and S. Canepari, Chemical characterization of atmospheric PM in Delhi, India, during different periods of the year including Diwali festival. Atmos. Pollut. Res., 2(4), 418-427 (2011).
2. Balakrishna, G. and S. Pervez, Source apportionment of atmospheric dust fallout in an urban-industrial environment in India. Aerosol Air Qual. Res., 9(3), 359-367 (2009).
3. Chelani, A.B., D.G. Gajghate and S. Devotta, Source apportionment of PM10 in Mumbai, India using CMB model. B. Environ. Contam. Tox., 81(2), 190-195 (2008).
4. Chowdhury, Z., M. Zheng and A.G. Russell, Source Apportionment and Characterization of Ambient Fine Particles in Delhi, Mumbai, Kolkata, and Chandigarh. Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA (2004).
5. Chellam, S., P. Kulkarni and M.P. Fraser, Emissions of organic compounds and trace metals in fine particulate matter from motor vehicles: A tunnel study in Houston, Texas. J. Air Waste Manage., 55(1), 60-72 (2005).
6. Gupta, A.K., K. Karar and A. Srivastava, Chemical mass balance source apportionment of PM10 and TSP in residential and industrial sites of an urban region of Kolkata, India. J. Hazard. Mater., 142(1-2), 279-287 (2007).
7. Karar, K. and A.K. Gupta, Source apportionment of PM10 at residential and industrial sites of an urban region of Kolkata, India. Atmos. Res., 84(1), 30-41 (2007).
8. Kulshrestha, U.C., M. Jain, R. Sekar, M. Vairamani, A.K. Sarkar and D.C. Parashar, Chemical characteristics and source apportionment of aerosols over Indian Ocean during INDOEX-1999. Curr. Sci. India, 80, 180-185 (2001).
9. Kumar, A.V., R.S. Patil and K.S.V. Nambi, Source apportionment of suspended particulate matter at two traffic junctions in Mumbai, India. Atmos. Environ., 35(25), 4245-4251 (2001).
10. Shukla, S.P. and M. Sharma, Source apportionment of atmospheric PM10 in Kanpur, India. Environ. Eng. Sci., 25(6), 849-861 (2008).
11. Khare, P., U.C. Kulshrestha, A. Saxena, N. Kumar, K.M. Kumari and S.S. Srivastava, The source apportionment of particulate matter using enrichment factor and principal component analysis. Indian J. Environ. Heal., 38(2), 86-94 (1996).
12. Kar, S., J.P. Maity, A.C. Samal and S.C. Santra, Metallic components of traffic-induced urban aerosol, their spatial variation, and source apportionment. Environ. Monit. Assess., 168(1-4), 561-574 (2010).
13. Srivastava, A. and V.K. Jain, Source apportionment of suspended particulate matters in a clean area of Delhi: A note. Transport. Res. D-Tr. E., 13(1), 59-63 (2008).
14. Srivastava, A., S. Gupta and V.K. Jain, Source apportionment of total suspended particulate matter in coarse and fine size ranges over Delhi. Aerosol Air Qual. Res., 8(2), 188-200 (2008).
15. Huggins, F.E., G.P. Huffman, W.P. Linak and C.A. Miller, Quantifying hazardous species in particulate matter derived from fossil-fuel combustion. Environ. Sci. Technol., 38(6), 1836-1842 (2004).
16. Reddy, M.S. and C. Venkataraman, Inventory of aerosol and sulphur dioxide emissions from India: I - Fossil fuel combustion. Atmos. Environ., 36(4), 677-697 (2002).
17. Furimsky, E., Characterization of trace element emissions from coal combustion by equilibrium calculations. Fuel Process. Technol., 63(1), 29-44 (2000).
18. Borrego, C., J. Valente, A. Carvalho, E. Sa, M. Lopes and A.I. Miranda, Contribution of residential wood combustion to PM10 levels in Portugal. Atmos. Environ., 44(5), 642-651 (2010).
19. Cooke, W.M., J.M. Allen and R.E. Hall, Characterization of emissions from residential wood combustion sources. In J.A. Cooper and D. Malek (Eds.). Residential Solid Fuels: Environmental Impacts and Solutions. Oregon Graduate Center, Portland, OR (1981).
20. Cooper, J.A., Environmental impact of residential wood combustion emissions and its implications. J. Air Pollut. Control Ass., 30(8), 855-861 (1980).
21. Fine, P.M., G.R. Cass and B.R.T. Simoneit, Chemical characterization of fine particle emissions from fireplace combustion of woods grown in the northeastern United States. Environ. Sci. Technol., 35(13), 2665-2675 (2001).
22. Fine, P.M., G.R. Cass and B.R.T. Simoneit, Chemical characterization of fine particle emissions from the fireplace combustion of wood types grown in the Midwestern and Western United States. Environ. Eng. Sci., 21(3), 387-409 (2004).
23. Fine, P.M., G.R. Cass and B.R.T. Simoneit, Chemical characterization of fine particle emissions from the wood stove combustion of prevalent United States tree species. Environ. Eng. Sci., 21(6), 705-721 (2004).
24. Hedberg, E., A. Kristensson, M. Ohlsson, C. Johansson, P.A. Johansson, E. Swietlicki, V. Vesely, U. Wideqvist and R. Westerholm, Chemical and physical characterization of emissions from birch wood combustion in a wood stove. Atmos. Environ., 36(30), 4823-4837 (2002).
25. Houck, J.E., J.M. Goulet, J.C. Chow and J.G. Watson, Chemical source characterization of residential wood combustion emissions in Denver, Colorado; Bakersfield, California; and Mammoth Lakes, California. 82nd Annual APCA Meeting, Anaheim, CA, Jun. 25-30 (1989).
26. McDonald, J.D., B. Zielinska, E.M. Fujita, J.C. Chow, J.G. Watson and J.C. Sagebiel, Chemical speciation of PM2.5 emissions from residential wood combustion and meat cooking. In J.C. Chow and P. Koutrakis (Eds.). PM2.5: A Fine Particle Standard. Air & Waste Management Association, Pittsburgh, PA (1998).
27. Pakrasi, A. and A.J. Buonicore, Fugitive dust emissions. In W.T. Davis (Ed.). Air Pollution Engineering Manual. 2nd Ed., John Wiley, New York (2000).
28. Schmidl, C., L.L. Marr, A. Caseiro, P. Kotianova, A. Berner, H. Bauer, A. Kasper-Giebl and H. Puxbaum, Chemical characterization of fine particle emissions from wood stove combustion of common woods growing in mid-European Alpine regions. Atmos. Environ., 42(1), 126-141 (2008).
29. Wu, C.Y., R. Piva, D.R. Broderick, J.E. Houck and J. Crouch, Emissions inventory oriented residential wood combustion survey. 14th Annual Emission Inventory Conference: Transforming Emissions Inventories - Meeting Future Challenges Today. Las Vegas, NV, Apr. 11-14 (2005).
30. Mohn, J., R. Figi, P. Graf, E. Gujer, R. Haag, P. Honegger, P. Mattrel, O. Nagel, P. Schmid, C. Seiler, C. Schreiner, E. Steinhauser, M. Zennegg and L. Emmenegger, 2002 wood combustion clean technology. 5th International Conference on Emission Monitoring. Odense, Denmark, Sep. 11-13 (2002).
31. Bonin, M.P., W.L. Flower, R.F. Renzi and L.W. Peng, Size and concentration measurements of particles produced in commercial chromium plating processes. J Air Waste Manage., 45(11), 902-907 (1995).
32. Stasko, S., Control of particulate matter. In W.T. Davis (Ed.). Air Pollution Engineering Manual. 2nd Ed., John Wiley, New York (2000).
33. Henry, R.C., Current factor analysis receptor models are ill-posed. Atmos. Environ., 21(8), 1815-1820 (1987).
34. Gadkari, N. and S. Pervez, Source apportionment of personal exposure of fine particulates among school communities in India. Environ. Monit. Assess., 142 (1-3), 227-241 (2008).
35. Sharma, V.K. and R.S. Patil, Chemical mass balance model for source apportionment of aerosols in Bombay. Environ. Monit. Assess., 29 (1), 75-88 (1994).
36. Srivastava, A., A.E. Joseph, S. Patil, A. More, R.C. Dixit and M. Prakash, Air toxics in ambient air of Delhi. Atmos. Environ., 39(1), 59-71 (2005).
37. Srivastava, A., Source apportionment of ambient VOCs in Mumbai city. Atmos. Environ., 38(39), 6829-6843 (2004).
38. Gadkari, N.M. and S. Pervez, Source investigationof personal particulates in relation to identify major routes of exposure among urban residential. Atmos. Environ., 41(36), 7951-7963 (2007).
39. Bhanuprasad, S.G., C. Venkataraman and M. Bhushan, Positive matrix factorization and trajectory modelling for source identification: A new look at Indian Ocean Experiment ship observations. Atmos. Environ., 42(20), 4836-4852 (2008).
40. Reff, A., S.I. Eberly and P.V. Bhave, Receptor modeling of ambient particulate matter data using positive matrix factorization: Review of existing methods. J. Air Waste Manage., 57(2), 146-154 (2007).
41. Yatkin, S. and A. Bayram, Source apportionment of PM10 and PM2.5 using positive matrix factorization and chemical mass balance in Izmir, Turkey. Sci. Total Environ., 390(1), 109-123 (2008).
42. Chakraborty, A. and T. Gupta, Chemical characterization and source apportionment of submicron (PM1) aerosol in Kanpur Region, India. Aerosol Air Qual. Res., 10(5), 433-445 (2010).
43. Henry, R.C., History and fundamentals of multivariate air duality receptor models. Chemometr. Intell. Lab., 37(1), 37-42 (1997).
44. Henry, R.C., Multivariate receptor modeling by N-dimensional edge detection. Chemometr. Intell. Lab., 65(2), 179-189 (2003).
45. Watson, J.G., T. Zhu, J.C. Chow, J. Engelbrecht, E.M. Fujita and W.E. Wilson, Receptor modeling application framework for particle source apportionment. Chemosphere, 49(9), 1093-1136 (2002).
46. Henry, R.C., Multivariate receptor models. In P.K.Hopke (Ed.). Receptor Modeling for Air Quality Management. Elsevier, Amsterdam, Netherlands (1991).
47. Kim, B.M. and R.C. Henry, Extension of self-modeling curve resolution to mixtures of more than three components: Part 2. Finding the complete solution. Chemometr. Intell. Lab., 49(1), 67-77 (1999).
48. Paatero, P., Least squares formulation of robust non-negative factor analysis. Chemometr. Intell. Lab., 37(1), 23-35 (1997).
49. Tiwari, S., A.K. Srivastava, D.S. Bisht, T. Bano, S. Singh, S. Behura, M.K. Srivastava, D.M. Chate and B. Padmanabhamurty, Black carbon and chemical characteristics of PM10 and PM2.5 at an urban site of North India. J. Atmos. Chem., 62(3), 193-209 (2009).
50. Goyal, P. and Sidhartha, Present scenario of air quality in Delhi: A case study of CNG implementation. Atmos. Environ., 37(38), 5423-5431 (2003).
51. Kathuria, V., Vehicular pollution control in Delhi: Impact of compressed natural gas. Econ. Polit. Weekly, 40(18), 1907-1916 (2005).
52. Raman, R.S. and S. Ramachandran, Annual and seasonal variability of ambient aerosols over an urban region in western India. Atmos. Environ., 44(9), 1200-1208 (2010).
53. Raman, R.S. and S. Ramachandran, Source apportionment of the ionic components in precipitation over an urban region in Western India. Environ. Sci. Pollut. R., 18(2), 212-225 (2011).
54. Srimuruganandam, B. and S.M.S. Nagendra, Application of positive matrix factorization in characterization of PM10 and PM2.5 emission sources at urban roadside. Chemosphere, 88(1), 120-130 (2012).
55. IMD, Climatological Tables of Observations in India 1951-1990. Indian Meteorological Department, New Delhi, India (1999).
56. CPCB, Air Quality Status and Trends in India. Central Pollution Control Board, New Delhi, India (2000).
57. PD, Economic Survey of Delhi 2005-06. Planning Department, Delhi, India (2006).
58. Srivastava, A. and V.K. Jain, A study to characterize the suspended particulate matter in an indoor environment in Delhi, India. Build. Environ., 42(5), 2046-2052 (2007).
59. Watson, J.G. and J.C. Chow, Receptor models for source apportionment of suspended particles. In B.L. Murphy and R.D. Morrison (Eds.). Introduction to Environmental Forensics. 2nd Ed., Academic Press, New York (2007).
60. Paatero, P., P.K. Hopke, X.H. Song and Z. Ramadan, Understanding and controlling rotations in factor analytic models. Chemometr. Intell. Lab., 60(1-2), 253-264 (2002).
61. US EPA., EPA Positive Matrix Factorization (PMF) 3.0 Model. US Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC (2010).
62. Kandlikar, M., Air pollution at a hotspot location in Delhi: Detecting trends, seasonal cycles and oscillations. Atmos. Environ., 41(28), 5934-5947 (2007).
63. Kushwaha, R., A. Srivastava, H. Lal, B. Ghosh and V.K. Jain, Particles size distribution of aerosols and associated metals, and source estimation in Delhi, India. Sustain. Environ. Res., 22(5), 317-325 (2012)
64. Kulshrestha, A., D.S. Bisht, J. Masih, D. Massey, S. Tiwari and A. Taneja, Chemical characterization of water-soluble aerosols in different residential environments of semi arid region of India. J. Atmos. Chem., 62(2), 121-138 (2009).
65. Tiwari, S., D.M. Chate, M.K. Srivastava, P.D. Safai, A.K. Srivastava, D.S. Bisht and B. Padmanabhamurty, Statistical evaluation of PM10 and distribution of PM1, PM2.5, and PM10 in ambient air due to extreme fireworks episodes (Deepawali festivals) in megacity Delhi. Nat. Hazards, 61(2), 521-531 (2012).
66. Srimuruganandam, B. and S.M.S. Nagendra, Chemical characterization of PM10 and PM2.5 mass concentrations emitted by heterogeneous traffic. Sci. Total Environ., 409(17), 3144-3157 (2011).
67. Vadjic, V., M. Gentilizza, J. Hrsak and I. Eskinja, The effect of metals and ammonia on SO2 oxidation to sulfates in the ambient air. Environ. Monit. Assess., 18(3), 163-171 (1991).