Ensuring PhD Development of Responsible Conduct of Research Behaviors: Who's Responsible?

Science and Engineering Ethics

Volumn 20, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 221-235

  Titus, Sandra L ^a   Ballou, Janice M ^b,c  

^a Office of Research Integrity   (United States)

^b MATHEMATICA POLICY RESEARCH   (United States)

^c Ballou Research   (United States)

Author keywords

Faculty roles; Institutional guidelines; Mentors and advisors; PhD education; Responsible conduct of research (RCR); Train the trainer

Indexed keywords

ATTITUDE; EDUCATION; ETHICS; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; RESEARCH ETHICS; SCIENCE; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; STUDENT; TEACHER; UNIVERSITY;

ATTITUDE; DATA COLLECTION; ETHICS, RESEARCH; FACULTY; HUMANS; MENTORS; SCIENCE; SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY; STUDENTS; UNIVERSITIES;

EID: 84894505126     PISSN: 13533452     EISSN: 16605454     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11948-013-9437-4     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. American Association for Public Opinion Research. (2008). Standard definitions: Final dispositions of case codes and outcome rates for surveys, (5th ed.). Lenexa, Kansas: AAPOR. http://www. aapor. org/For_Researchers/4683. htm.
2. American Association for Public Opinion Research. (2011). Standard definitions: Final dispositions of case codes and outcome rates for surveys, (7th ed.). AAPOR. http://www. aapor. org/AM/Template. cfm?Section=Standard_Definitions2&Template=/CM/ContentDisplay. cfm&ContentID=3156.
3. Association of American Medical Colleges. (2006). Compact between postdoctoral appointees and their mentors. https://www. aamc. org/initiatives/postdoccompact/. Accessed 1 Feb 2013.
4. Association of American Medical Colleges. (2008). Compact between compact between biomedical graduate students and their research advisors. https://www. aamc. org/download/49868/data/gradcompact. pdf. Accessed 1 Feb 2013.
5. Ballou, J. (2009). Report on views of faculty on their role and their institutions' role in promoting the development of responsible researchers, report to office of research integrity. New Jersey: Mathematica Policy Research, Inc.
6. Benderly, B. (2007). Making mentoring mandatory. Science Careers. http://sciencecareers. sciencemag. org/career_development/previous_issues/articles/2007_10_05/caredit_a0700140/(parent)/12037. Accessed 11 Sep 2012.
7. Berk, R., Berg, J., Mortimer, R., Walton-Moss, B., & Yeo, T. (2008). Measuring the effectiveness of faculty mentoring relationships. Academic Medicine, 80(1), 66-71.
8. Bird, S. (2001). Mentors advisors and supervisors: Their role in teaching responsible conduct of research. Science and Engineering Ethics, 7, 455-468.
9. Blackwell, J., (1987). Mentoring and networking among blacks, pursuit of equality in higher education. In: A. S. Pruitt (Ed.) (pp 146-162). Dix Hills, NY: General Hall.
10. Fanelli, D., (2009). How many scientists fabricate and falsify research? A systematic review and meta-analysis of survey data. PLOS. http://www. plosone. org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10. 1371%2Fjournal. pone. 0005738.
11. Hartnett, R. T. (1976). Environment for Advanced Learning. In J. Katz & R. T. Harnett (Eds.), Scholars in the making: The development of graduate and professional students (pp. 49-84). Cambridge, MA: Ballinger Publishing.
12. Howard Hughes Medical Institute and Burroughs Welcome Fund., (2004) Making the right moves: A practical guide to scientific management for, postdoc and new faculty, mentoring and being mentored, chapter 5 http://www. hhmi. org/resources/labmanagement/downloads/moves2. pdf. Accessed 1 Feb 2013.
13. Lee, A., Dennis, C., Campbell, P. Nature's guide for mentors nature 447. Nature. (2007) doi: 10. 1038/447791a. http://www. nature. com/nature/journal/v447/n7146/full/447791a. html. Accessed 1 Feb 2013.
14. Martinson, B., Anderson, M., De Vries, R. (2005). Scientists behaving badly. Nature, (435), 737-738. doi: 10. 1038/435737a; http://www. nature. com/nature/journal/v435/n7043/full/435737a. html. Accessed 1 Feb 2013.
15. National Academy of Sciences. (1989a). Institute of medicine, the responsible conduct of research in the health sciences. Washington, DC: National Academy Press http://www. nap. edu/catalog. php?record_id=1388.
16. National Academy of Sciences. (1989b). The responsible conduct of research in the health sciences. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
17. National Academy of Sciences. (1992). Responsible science, ensuring the integrity of the research process, (Vol. I). Washington, DC: National Academies Press http://www. nap. edu/catalog. php?record_id=1864. Accessed 1 Feb 2013.
18. National Academy of Sciences. (1997). Adviser, teacher, role model, friend: On being a mentor to students in science and engineering. Washington, DC: National Academies Press http://www. nap. edu/catalog. php?record_id=5789#toc. Accessed 1 Feb 2013.
19. National Academy of Sciences. (2009). IOM report, on being a scientist: A guide to responsible conduct in research. Washington, DC: National Academies Press http://www. nap. edu/catalog. php?record_id=12192#toc.
20. National Academy of Sciences Integrity in Scientific Research. (2002). Creating an environment that promotes responsible conduct. Washington, DC: National Academies Press http://www. nap. edu/catalog. php?record_id=10430.
21. NIH Guide for Grants and Contracts. (1989). Requirement for instruction in the responsible conduct of research in national research service award institutional training grants (Vol. 18). http://grants. nih. gov/grants/guide/historical/1989_12_22_Vol_18_No_45. pdf.
22. NIH Guide for Grants and Contracts. (1990). Requirement for instruction in the responsible conduct of research in national research service award institutional training grants (Vol. 19). http://grants. nih. gov/grants/guide/historical/1990_08_17_Vol_19_No_30. pdf.
23. NIH Guide for Grants and Contracts. (1992). Requirement for instruction in the responsible conduct of research in national research service award institutional training grants (Vol. 21). http://grants. nih. gov/grants/guide/notice-files/not92-236. html.
24. Nettles, M. and Millett, C. (2006). Three magic letters: Getting to PhD. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
25. PHS Policy on Responsible Conduct of Research. (2000). gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-03-002. http://www. cddc. vt. edu/aoir/ethics/public/rcrploicy. pdf. Accessed 1 Feb 2013.
26. Rose, G. (2002). Group differences in graduate student's concepts of the ideal mentor Research in Higher Education, 46(1). doi: 10. 1007/s11162-6289-4.
27. Steneck, N. (2007). ORI introduction to the responsible conduct of research, ORI http://ori. hhs. gov/documents/rcrintro. pdf.
28. Teitelbaum S. (1989). Research integrity is a mentoring issue, not a lecture course, federation of american societies for experimental biology (FASEB) Paper, 1989. http://www. faseb. org/portals/0/pdfs/opa/nr10x10x2b. pdf; Accessed 27 Jan 2013.
29. Titus, S., Ballou, J. (2012). Faculty members' perceptions on advising versus mentoring: Does the name matter?. Science and Engineering Ethics. doi: 10. 1007/s11948-012-9366-7. http://link. springer. com/article/10. 1007/s11948-012-9366-7?no-access=true.
30. Walker, G., & Golde, G. (2008). The formation of scholars: rethinking doctoral education for the twenty first century. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
31. Wright, D., Titus, S., & Cornelson, J. (2008). Mentoring and research misconduct: An analysis of research mentoring in closed ORI cases. Science and Engineering Ethics, 14, 323-336.