A comparison of perinatal outcomes in singletons and multiples born after in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection stratified for neonatal risk criteria

Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica

Volumn 93, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 277-286

  Van Heesch, Mirjam M J ^a   Evers, Johannes L H ^b   Dumoulin, John C M ^b   Van Der Hoeven, Mark A H B M ^a   Van Beijsterveldt, Catharina E M ^c   Bonsel, Gouke J ^d,e   Dykgraaf, Ramon H M ^d   Van Goudoever, Johannes B ^f,g   Koopman Esseboom, Corine ^h   Nelen, Willianne L D M ⁱ   Steiner, Katerina ⁱ   Tamminga, Pieter ^f   Tonch, Nino ^j   Van Zonneveld, Piet ^k   Dirksen, Carmen D ^a  

^a MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^c VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^d ERASMUS MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^e Midwifery Academy Rotterdam   (Netherlands)

^f EMMA CHILDREN S HOSPITAL   (Netherlands)

^g VU UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^h UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

ⁱ RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^j ACADEMIC MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^k UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

more..

Author keywords

In vitro fertilization; intracytoplasmic sperm injection; multiple pregnancy; multiples; perinatal outcome; singletons

Indexed keywords

IN VITRO FERTILIZATION; INTRACYTOPLASMIC SPERM INJECTION; MULTIPLE PREGNANCY; MULTIPLES; PERINATAL OUTCOME; SINGLETONS;

ADULT; APGAR SCORE; BIRTH WEIGHT; COHORT STUDIES; CONGENITAL ABNORMALITIES; FEMALE; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; GESTATIONAL AGE; HUMANS; INFANT, NEWBORN; INTENSIVE CARE UNITS, NEONATAL; LENGTH OF STAY; MALE; MULTIPLE BIRTH OFFSPRING; NETHERLANDS; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; PREGNANCY, MULTIPLE; REGISTRIES; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK FACTORS; SOCIAL CLASS; SPERM INJECTIONS, INTRACYTOPLASMIC;

EID: 84894485819     PISSN: 00016349     EISSN: 16000412     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/aogs.12328     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Evers JL,. Female subfertility. Lancet. 2002; 360: 151-9.
2. Kremer JA, Bots RS, Cohlen B, Crooij M, van Dop PA, Jansen CA, et al. Tien jaar resultaten van in-vitrofertilisatie in Nederland, 1996-2005 [Ten years of results of in-vitro fertilization in the Netherlands 1996-2005]. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2008; 152: 146-52.
3. Nyboe Andersen A, Goossens V, Bhattacharya S, Ferraretti AP, Kupka MS, de Mouzon J, et al. Assisted reproductive technology and intrauterine inseminations in Europe, 2005: Results generated from European registers by ESHRE: ESHRE. The European IVF Monitoring Programme (EIM), for the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE). Hum Reprod. 2009; 24: 1267-87.
4. Multiple gestation pregnancy. The ESHRE Capri Workshop Group. Hum Reprod. 2000; 15: 1856-64.
5. Kinzler WL, Ananth CV, Vintzileos AM,. Medical and economic effects of twin gestations. J Soc Gynecol Investig. 2000; 7: 321-7.
6. Koivurova S, Hartikainen AL, Gissler M, Hemminki E, Sovio U, Jarvelin MR,. Neonatal outcome and congenital malformations in children born after in-vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod. 2002; 17: 1391-8.
7. Olivennes F, Fanchin R, Ledee N, Righini C, Kadoch IJ, Frydman R,. Perinatal outcome and developmental studies on children born after IVF. Hum Reprod Update. 2002; 8: 117-28.
8. Pinborg A, Loft A, Nyboe Andersen A,. Neonatal outcome in a Danish national cohort of 8602 children born after in-vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection: the role of twin pregnancy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2004; 83: 1071-8.
9. Bergh T, Ericson A, Hillensjo T, Nygren KG, Wennerholm UB,. Deliveries and children born after in-vitro fertilisation in Sweden 1982-95: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet. 1999; 354: 1579-85.
10. Dhont M, De Sutter P, Ruyssinck G, Martens G, Bekaert A,. Perinatal outcome of pregnancies after assisted reproduction: a case-control study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999; 181: 688-95.
11. McDonald S, Murphy K, Beyene J, Ohlsson A,. Perinatal outcomes of in-vitro fertilization twins: a systematic review and meta-analyses. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005; 193: 141-52.
12. McDonald SD, Han Z, Mulla S, Murphy KE, Beyene J, Ohlsson A, et al. Preterm birth and low birth weight among in-vitro fertilization singletons: a systematic review and meta-analyses. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2009; 146: 138-48.
13. McDonald SD, Han Z, Mulla S, Ohlsson A, Beyene J, Murphy KE, et al. Preterm birth and low birth weight among in-vitro fertilization twins: a systematic review and meta-analyses. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2010; 148: 105-13.
14. Schieve LA, Meikle SF, Ferre C, Peterson HB, Jeng G, Wilcox LS,. Low and very low birth weight in infants conceived with use of assisted reproductive technology. N Engl J Med. 2002; 346: 731-7.
15. van Beijsterveldt CE, Bartels M, Boomsma DI,. Comparison of naturally conceived and IVF-DZ twins in the Netherlands Twin Registry: a developmental study. J Pregnancy. 2011; 2011: 517614.
16. Henningsen AK, Pinborg A, Lidegaard O, Vestergaard C, Forman JL, Andersen AN,. Perinatal outcome of singleton siblings born after assisted reproductive technology and spontaneous conception: Danish national sibling-cohort study. Fertil Steril. 2011; 95: 959-63.
17. Romundstad LB, Romundstad PR, Sunde A, von During V, Skjaerven R, Gunnell D, et al. Effects of technology or maternal factors on perinatal outcome after assisted fertilisation: a population-based cohort study. Lancet. 2008; 372: 737-43.
18. PRN. [Perinatal Care in the Netherlands 2005]. Utrecht: Stichting Perinatale Registratie Nederland, 2008.
19. van Heesch MM, Bonsel GJ, Dumoulin JC, Evers JL, van der Hoeven MA, Severens JL, et al. Long term costs and effects of reducing the number of twin pregnancies in IVF by single embryo transfer: the TwinSing study. BMC Pediatr. 2010; 10: 75.
20. Klemetti R, Gissler M, Hemminki E,. Comparison of perinatal health of children born from IVF in Finland in the early and late 1990s. Hum Reprod. 2002; 17: 2192-8.
21. Koivurova S, Hartikainen AL, Karinen L, Gissler M, Hemminki E, Martikainen H, et al. The course of pregnancy and delivery and the use of maternal healthcare services after standard IVF in Northern Finland 1990-1995. Hum Reprod. 2002; 17: 2897-903.
22. Pinborg A, Loft A, Rasmussen S, Schmidt L, Langhoff-Roos J, Greisen G, et al. Neonatal outcome in a Danish national cohort of 3438 IVF/ICSI and 10,362 non-IVF/ICSI twins born between 1995 and 2000. Hum Reprod. 2004; 19: 435-41.
23. Westergaard HB, Johansen AM, Erb K, Andersen AN,. Danish National In-Vitro Fertilization Registry 1994 and 1995: a controlled study of births, malformations and cytogenetic findings. Hum Reprod. 1999; 14: 1896-902.
24. Pinborg A,. IVF/ICSI twin pregnancies: risks and prevention. Hum Reprod Update. 2005; 11: 575-93.
25. Rizk B, Doyle P, Tan SL, Rainsbury P, Betts J, Brinsden P, et al. Perinatal outcome and congenital malformations in in-vitro fertilization babies from the Bourn-Hallam group. Hum Reprod. 1991; 6: 1259-64.
26. Rufat P, Olivennes F, de Mouzon J, Dehan M, Frydman R,. Task force report on the outcome of pregnancies and children conceived by in-vitro fertilization (France: 1987 to 1989). Fertil Steril. 1994; 61: 324-30.
27. De Sutter P, Delbaere I, Gerris J, Verstraelen H, Goetgeluk S, Van der Elst J, et al. Birthweight of singletons after assisted reproduction is higher after single- than after double-embryo transfer. Hum Reprod. 2006; 21: 2633-7.
28. Poikkeus P, Gissler M, Unkila-Kallio L, Hyden-Granskog C, Tiitinen A,. Obstetric and neonatal outcome after single embryo transfer. Hum Reprod. 2007; 22: 1073-9.
29. Wang YA, Sullivan EA, Healy DL, Black DA,. Perinatal outcomes after assisted reproductive technology treatment in Australia and New Zealand: single versus double embryo transfer. Med J Aust. 2009; 190: 234-7.
30. Fiddelers AA, Severens JL, Dirksen CD, Dumoulin JC, Land JA, Evers JL,. Economic evaluations of single-versus double-embryo transfer in IVF. Hum Reprod Update. 2007; 13: 5-13.