What can we learn from hedonic models when housing markets are dominated by foreclosures?

Annual Review of Resource Economics

Volumn 5, Issue , 2013, Pages 261-279

  Coulson, N Edward ^a   Zabel, Jeffrey E ^b  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b TUFTS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Environmental amenities; Housing market cycle; Implicit prices; Market equilibrium

Indexed keywords

EID: 84886892152     PISSN: 19411340     EISSN: 19411359     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1146/annurev-resource-091912-151759     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Bajari P, Cooley Fruehwirth J, Kim K, Timmins C. 2012. A rational expectations approach to hedonic regressions with time-varying unobserved product attributes: the price of pollution. Am. Econ. Rev. 102(5):1898-926
2. Bartik TJ. 1988. Measuring the benefits of amenity improvements in hedonic price models. Land Econ. 64(2):172-83
3. Bin O, Polasky S. 2004. Effects of flood hazards on property values: evidence before and after Hurricane Floyd. Land Econ. 80:490-500
4. Campbell J, Giglio S, Pathak P. 2011. Forced sales and house prices. Am. Econ. Rev. 101(5):2108-31
5. Chay K, Greenstone M. 2005. Does air quality matter? Evidence from the housing market. J. Polit. Econ. 133(2):376-424
6. Chernobai A, Chernobai E. 2013. Is selection bias inherent in housing transactions? An equilibrium approach. Real Estate Econ. In press
7. Coulson NE, Bond EW. 1990. A hedonic analysis of residential succession. Rev. Econ. Stat. 72:433-43
8. DiPasquale D, WheatonWC. 1994. Housing market dynamics and the future of housing prices. J. Urban Econ. 35:1-27
9. Epple D. 1987. Hedonic prices and implicit markets: estimating demand and supply functions for differentiated products. J. Polit. Econ. 95(1):59-80
10. Follain J, Velz O. 1995. Incorporating the number of existing home sales into a structural model of the market for owner-occupied housing. J. Hous. Econ. 4:93-117
11. Gamper-Rabindran S, Timmins C. 2011. Valuing the benefits of Superfund site remediation: three approaches to measuring localized externalities. Work. Pap. 16,655, Natl. Bur. Econ. Res., Cambridge, Mass.
12. Genesove D, Mayer CJ. 2001. Loss aversion and seller behavior: evidence from the housing market. Q. J. Econ. 116(4):1233-60Gerardi
13. K, Rosenblatt E, Willen P, Yao V. 2012. Foreclosure externalities: some new evidence. Work. Pap. 2012-11, Fed. Reserve Bank, Atlanta
14. Greenstone M, Gallagher J. 2008. Does hazardous waste matter? Evidence from the housing market and the Superfund program. Q. J. Econ. 123(3):951-1003
15. Guren A, McQuade T. 2012. How do foreclosures exacerbate housing downturns? Work. Pap., Dep. Econ., Harvard Univ.
16. Harding JP, Rosenblatt E, Yao VW. 2012. The foreclosure discount: myth or reality? J. Urban Econ. 74:204-18
17. HarrisonDM,Smersh GT, Schwartz ALJr. 2001. Environmental determinants of housing prices: the impact of flood zone status. J. Real Estate Res. 21:3-20
18. Hilber C. 2005. Neighborhood externality risk and the homeownership status of properties. J. Urban Econ. 57: 213-41
19. Hwang M, Quigley JM. 2006. Economic fundamentals in local housing markets: evidence from US metropolitan regions. J. Reg. Sci. 46(3):425-53
20. Immergluck D, Smith G. 2005. There goes the neighborhood: the effect of single-family mortgage foreclosures on property values. Work. Pap., Woodstock Inst., Chicago
21. Immergluck D, Smith G. 2006. The impact of single-family mortgage foreclosures on neighborhood crime. Hous. Stud. 21(6):851-66
22. Kiel KA, Williams M. 2007. The impact of Superfund sites on local property values: Are all sites the same? J. Urban Econ. 61:170-92
23. Kiel KA, Zabel JE. 1999. The accuracy of owner-provided house values: the 1978-1991 American Housing Survey. Real Estate Econ. 27: 263-298
24. Kim CW, Phipps TT, Anselin L. 2003. Measuring the benefits of air quality improvement: a spatial hedonic approach. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 45:24-39
25. Krainer J. 2001. A theory of liquidity in residential real estate markets. J. Urban Econ. 49:32-53
26. Kuminoff NV, Smith VK, Timmins C. 2010. The new economics of equilibrium sorting and its transformational role for policy evaluation. Work. Pap. 16,349, Natl. Bur. Econ. Res., Cambridge, Mass.
27. Leamer E. 2007. Housing IS the business cycle.Work. Pap. 13,248, Natl. Bur. Econ. Res., Cambridge, Mass.
28. MacDonald DN, White HL, Taube PM, Huth WL. 1990. Flood hazard pricing and insurance premium differentials: evidence from the housing market. J. Risk Insur. 57:654-63
29. Malloy R, Shan H. 2013. The post-foreclosure experience of US households. Real Estate Econ. In press McKenzie
30. R Levendis J. 2010 Flood hazards and urban housing markets: the effects of Katrina on New Orleans. J. Real Estate Financ. Econ. 40 62-76
31. Minn. Popul. Cent. 2011. National Historical Geographic Information System: Version 2.0. Minneapolis, MN: Univ. Minn. http://www.nhgis.org
32. Neill HR, Hassenzahl DM, Assane DD. 2007. Estimating the effect of air quality: spatial versus traditional hedonic price models. South. Econ. J. 73(4):1088-111
33. Nelson JP. 2004. Meta-Analysis of airport noise and hedonic property values. J. Transp. Econ. Policy 38(1):1-27
34. Novy-Marx R. 2009. Hot and cold markets. Real Estate Econ. 37(1):1-22
35. Palmquist R. 1991. Hedonic methods. In Measuring the Demand for Environmental Quality, ed. JB Braden, CD Kolstad, pp. 77-120. Amsterdam: Elsevier
36. Pope JC. 2008. Buyer information and the hedonic: the impact of a seller disclosure on the implicit price for airport noise. J. Urban Econ. 17:498-516
37. Riddel M. 2004. Housing-market disequilibrium: an examination of housing-market price and stock dynamics 1967-1998. J. Hous. Econ. 13:120-35
38. Ridker RG, Henning JA. 1967. The determinants of residential property values with special reference to air pollution. Rev. Econ. Stat. 49:246-57
39. Rosen S. 1974. Hedonic prices and implicit markets: product differentiation in pure competition. J. Polit. Econ. 82(1):34-55
40. Shilling J, Sirmans CF, Benjamin J. 1985. Flood insurance, wealth redistribution, and urban property values. J. Urban Econ. 26:43-53Sieg
41. H, Smith VK, Banzhalf HS, Walsh R. 2004. Estimating the general equilibrium benefits of large changes in spatially delineated public goods. Int. Econ. Rev. 45(4):1047-77
42. Smith VK, Carbone JC, Hallstrom DG, Pope JC, Darden ME. 2006. Adjusting to natural disasters. J. Risk Uncertain. 33(1):37-54
43. Smith VK, Huang JC. 1995. Can markets value air quality?A meta-Analysis of hedonic property value models. J. Polit. Econ. 103(1):209-27
44. Smith VK, Sieg H, Banzhalf HS, Walsh R. 2004. General equilibrium benefits for environmental improvements: projected ozone reductions under EPA's prospective analysis for the Los Angeles air basin. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 47(3):559-84
45. Speyer J, RagasWR.1991. Housing prices and flood risk: an examination using spline regression. J. Real Estate Financ. Econ. 4:395-407
46. Turnbull G, Zahirovic-Herbert V, Mothorpe C. 2013. Flooding and liquidity on the bayou: the capitalization of flood risk into house value and ease-of-sale. Real Estate Econ. 41(1):103-29
47. Zabel JE. 2013. A disequilibrium model of the housing market: the role of vacancies and foreclosures.Work. Pap., Dep. Econ., Tufts Univ.
48. Zabel JE, Kiel KA. 2000. Estimating the demand for air quality in four United States cities. Land Econ. 76:174-93