An example of an application of the semiotic inspection method in the domain of computerized patient record system

Studies in Health Technology and Informatics

Volumn 192, Issue 1-2, 2013, Pages 471-475

  Tancredi, Weronika ^a,b   Torgersson, Olof ^a  

^a CHALMERS UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

^b ESSIQ   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Computerized Patient Record System (CPR); Expert Usability Evaluation; Flow; Interface Navigation; Semiotic Inspection Method (SIM); Workflow

Indexed keywords

PATIENT TREATMENT; SEMIOTICS;

COMPUTERIZED PATIENT RECORD; FLOW; SEMIOTIC INSPECTION METHODS; USABILITY EVALUATION; WORKFLOW;

INSPECTION;

COMPUTER INTERFACE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD; MEDICAL RECORD; NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING; SWEDEN; WORKFLOW;

DENTAL RECORDS; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS; HEALTH RECORDS, PERSONAL; NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING; SOFTWARE; SOFTWARE VALIDATION; SWEDEN; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE; WORKFLOW;

EID: 84894382158     PISSN: 09269630     EISSN: 18798365     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.3233/978-1-61499-289-9-471     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (10)

1. de S Reis S, and Prates RO. Applicability of the semiotic inspection method: a systematic literature review. In: Gomes AS, de Souza CS, Sanches JA, editors. Proc. 10th Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems and the 5th Latin American Conf. on Human-Computer Interaction. Porto Alegre, Brazil: Brazilian Computer Society; 2011. pp. 177-186.
2. de Souza CS and , Leitão CF. Semiotic engineering methods for scientific research in HCI. Morgan & Claypool Publishers: 2009.
3. de Souza CS, Leitão CF, Prates RO, da Silva EJ. The semiotic inspection method. In: Proc. of IHC. New York: ACM; 2006. pp. 148-157.
4. Bento LFH, Prates RO, and Chaimowicz L. Using semiotic inspection method to evaluate a human-robot interface. In: Proc. Latin American Web Congress. Washington DC: IEEE; 2009. pp. 77-84.
5. Finneran CM, and Zhang P. The challenges of studying flow within a computer-mediated environment. In: Proceedings of Eighth Americas Conference on Information Systems. Dallas: ACIS; 2002. pp.1047-1054.
6. Csikszentmihalyi M. Flow: the psychology of optimal experience. New York: Harpers Perennial; 1990.
7. Brandao A, Trevisan DG, Brandao L, Moreira B, and Nascimento G, Vasconcelos CN, Clua E, Mourao P. Semiotic inspection of a game for children with down syndrome. In: Proc. 2010 Brazilian Symposium on Games and Digital Entertainment. Washington DC: ACM; 2011. pp. 199-210.
8. Peixoto DC, Prates RO, and Resende RF. Semiotic inspection method in the context of educational simulation games. In: Proc. 2010 ACM Symposium on Applied Computing. New York NY: ACM; 2010. pp. 1207-1212.
9. de Souza CS, Leitao CF, Prates RO, Bim SA, and da Silva EJ. Can inspection methods generate valid new knowledge in HCI? The case of semiotic inspection. Int J Human-Computer Studies 2010: 68: 22-40.
10. Andre TS, Hartson R, Belz, SM, and McCreary FA. The user action framework: a reliable foundation for usability engineering support. Int J Human-Computer Studies 2001 Jan: 54(1): 107-136.