Improving the effectiveness of impact assessment pertaining to Indigenous peoples in the Brazilian environmental licensing procedure

Environmental Impact Assessment Review

Volumn 46, Issue , 2014, Pages 58-67

  Hanna, Philippe ^a   Vanclay, Frank ^a   Langdon, Esther Jean ^b   Arts, Jos ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

^b FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF SANTA CATARINA   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Environmental impact assessment; Ethnogenesis; Indigenous Component Study; Self determination; Social impact assessment; Territoriality

Indexed keywords

APPLICATION PROGRAMS; ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL EFFECTS; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENTS;

ETHNOGENESIS; INDIGENOUS COMPONENT STUDY; SELF-DETERMINATION; SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENTS; TERRITORIALITY;

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT;

ACCOUNTABILITY; COMPLIANCE; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT; EXPERT SYSTEM; INDIGENOUS POPULATION; QUESTIONNAIRE SURVEY; SELF DETERMINATION; SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT; TERRITORIALITY; TRADITIONAL KNOWLEDGE;

BRAZIL;

EID: 84894318802     PISSN: 01959255     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.eiar.2014.01.005     Document Type: Article

References (132)

1. Agência Brasil Servidores da Funai anunciam continuidade da greve por tempo indeterminado [Homepage of Agência Brasil], [Online] Available, [2013, August 21]. http://agenciabrasil.ebc.com.br/noticia/2012-07-09/servidores-da-funai-anunciam-continuidade-da-greve-por-tempo-indeterminado.
2. Albert B. O ouro canibal e a queda do céu. Uma crítica xamânica da economia política da natureza (Yanomami). Pacificando o branco: cosmologias do contato no Norte-Amazônico 2002, 239-274. IMESP/IRD/Ed.UNESP, São Paulo. B. Albert, A. Ramos (Eds.).
3. Anaya J. The right of Indigenous peoples to self-determination in the post-declaration era. Making the declaration work: the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous peoples 2009, 184-199. International Work Group for Indigenous Affairs, Copenhagen. C. Chartres, R. Stavenhagen (Eds.).
4. Anaya J. Report by the special rapporteur on the situation of human rights and fundamental freedoms of Indigenous people. Addendum: cases examined by the special rapporteur (June 2009-July 2010) 2010, United Nations, Geneva.
5. Arhem K. The cosmic food web: human-nature relatedness in the Northwest Amazon. Nature and Society. Anthropological Perspectives 1996, 185-204. Routledge, London. P. Descola, P. Pálsson (Eds.).
6. Arruti J.M.A. From 'mixed Indians' to 'Indigenous remainders': strategies of ethnocide and ethnogenesis in northeastern Brazil. The challenge of diversity: indigenous peoples and reform of the state in Latin America 2000, 97-121. Thela Thesis, Amsterdam. W. Assies, G.V.D. Haar, A.J. Hoekema (Eds.).
7. B&HRI How to do business with respect for human rights: a guidance tool for companies 2010, Global Compact Network Netherlands, The Hague.
8. Baines S. Antropologia do desenvolvimento e a questão das sociedades indígenas. Rev Anthropol 2011, 15(2):29-46.
9. Baines J., Taylor C., Vanclay F. Social impact assessment and ethical social research principles: ethical professional practice, Part II. Impact Assess Proj Apprais 2013, 31(4):254-260.
10. Balée W. Indigenous transformation of Amazonian forests: an example from Maranhão, Brazil. L'Homme 1993, 33(126):231-254.
11. Barth F. An anthropology of knowledge. Curr Anthropol 2002, 43(1):1-18.
12. Berkes F. Sacred ecology: traditional ecological knowledge and resource management 2008, Taylor & Francis, Philadelphia.
13. Boadle A. Amazon Indians occupy controversial dam to demand a say [Homepage of Reuters], [Online] Available, [2013, August 21]. http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/05/03/us-brazil-dams-protest-idUSBRE94211820130503.
14. Borges A. Com orçamento de R$ 609 milhões, Funai tem apenas 17 pessoas no licenciamento [Homepage of Valor Econômico], [Online] Available, [2013, September 10]. http://www.valor.com.br/politica/3089662/com-orcamento-de-r-609-milhoes-funai-tem-apenas-17-pessoas-no-licenciamento.
15. Brasil Resolução 001, 23 de Janeiro de 1986. Dispõe sobre critérios básicos e diretrizes gerais para a avaliação de impacto ambiental 1986, 2548-2549. [Resolution 001, 23 January 1986], Diário Oficial da União (DOU), Brasília, [17 February 1986].
16. Brasil Lei No. 8.437, de 30 de Junho de 1992. Dispõe sobre a concessão de medidas cautelares contra atos do Poder Público e dá outras providências 1992, 8357. [Law n. 8.437, 30 June 1992], Diário Oficial da União (DOU), Brasília, [01 July 1992].
17. Brasil Resolução 237, 29 de Dezembro de 1997. Estabelece a revisão dos procedimentos e critérios utilizados no licenciamento ambiental, de forma a efetivar a utilização do sistema de licenciamento como instrumento de gestão ambiental, instituído pela Política Nacional do Meio Ambiente 1997, 30841-30843. [Resolution 237, 19 December 1997], Diário Oficial da União (DOU), Brasília, [24].
18. Brasil Decreto No. 5051, 19 de Abril de 2004. Promulga a Convenção no 169 da Organização Internacional do Trabalho - OIT sobre Povos Indígenas e Tribais 2004, 1. [Decree n. 5051, 19 April 2004], Diário Oficial da União (DOU), Brasília, [20 April 2004].
19. Brasil Decreto No. 6.040, 7 de Fevereiro. Institui a Política Nacional de desenvolvimento sustentável dos povos e comunidades tradicionais 2007, p.316. [Decree n. 6.040, 7 February 2007], Diário Oficial da União (DOU), Brasília, [08 February 2007].
20. Brasil Portaria Interministerial No. 419 de 26 de Outubro de 2011 - Regulamenta a atuação dos órgãos e entidades da Administração Pública Federal envolvidos no licenciamento ambiental, de que trata o art. 14 da Lei no 11.516, de 28 de agosto de 2007 2011, 81. Diário Oficial da União (DOU), Brasília, [28 February 2011].
21. Brasil Sinopse do censo demográfico 2010 2011, Ministério do Planejamento, Orçamento e Gestão, Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística - IBGE, Rio de Janeiro.
22. Brasil Decreto No. 7.747, de 5 de Junho de 2012. Institui a Política Nacional de Gestão Territorial e Ambiental de Terras Indígenas - PNGATI, e dá outras providências 2012, 9. [Decree n. 7.747, 5 June 2012], Diário Oficial da União, Brasília, [109].
23. Brito B., Barreto P. A eficácia da aplicação da lei de crimes ambientais pelo Ibama para proteção de florestas no Pará. Rev Direito Ambiental 2006, 1(43):35-65.
24. Bronz D. Empreendimentos e Empreendedores: formas de gestão, classificações e conflitos a partir do licenciamento ambiental, Brasil, século XXI 2011, (PhD Thesis), Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro.
25. Burdge R.J., Vanclay F. Social impact assessment: a contribution to the state of the art series. Impact Assess 1996, 14(1):59-86.
26. Cardoso de Oliveira R. O mal-estar da ética na antropologia prática. Antropologia e Ética: O debate atual no Brasil 2004, 21-32. EdUFF, Niterói. C. Víctora, R.G. Oliven, M.E. Maciel, A.P. Oro (Eds.).
27. Cariño J., Colchester M. From dams to development justice: progress with 'Free, Prior and Informed Consent' since the World Commission on Dams. Water Altern 2010, 3(2):423.
28. Carneiro da Cunha M., Almeida M. Indigenous people, traditional people, and conservation in the Amazon. Daedalus 2000, 129(2):315-338.
29. Cobo J.M. Study of the problem of discrimination against Indigenous populations. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights 1986, United Nations, Geneva.
30. Cochran P.A., Marshall C.A., Garcia-Downing C., Kendall E., Cook D., McCubbin L., et al. Indigenous ways of knowing: implications for participatory research and community. Am J Public Health 2008, 98(1):22-27.
31. Colchester M. Self-determination or environmental determinism for Indigenous peoples in tropical forest conservation. Conserv Biol 2000, 14(5):1365-1367.
32. Corntassel J. Who is Indigenous? 'Peoplehood' and ethnonationalist approaches to rearticulating Indigenous identity. Nationalism Ethn Polit 2003, 9(1):75-100.
33. CPI-SP Até que ponto a nossa opinião vai valer? [Homepage of Comissão Pró-Índio de São Paulo], [Online] Available, [2013, 09 September]. http://cpisp3.wix.com/proindio-saopaulo#!galiza/c9sv.
34. Daou A.M.L. Notas comprometidas sobre a discussão dos efeitos sociais de grandes projetos hidrelétricos, antropologia e a atualidade da temática. Rev Antropol 2010, 2(2):282-298.
35. Davis S.H., Wali A. Indigenous land tenure and tropical forest management in Latin America. Ambio 1994, 23(8):485-490.
36. de Paula L.R. Antropologia, desenvolvimento e estudos de impacto ambiental - a responsabilidade social do antropólogo revisitada. Rev Antropol 2010, 2(2):252-281.
37. Doyle C., Cariño J. Making free, prior and informed consent a reality, Indigenous peoples and the extractive sector [Homepage of Piplinks], [Online] Available, [2013, 03 September]. http://www.piplinks.org/system/files/Consortium+FPIC+report+-+May+2103+-+web+version.pdf.
38. Ellen R. 'Déjà vu, all over again', again: reinvention and progress in applying local knowledge to development. Participating in development: approaches to Indigenous knowledge 2002, 235-258. Routledge, London. P. Sillitoe, A. Bicker, J. Pottier (Eds.).
39. Emery A.R. Guidelines: integrating Indigenous knowledge in project planning and implementation 2000, World Bank, Washington.
40. Fearnside P. Brazil's Samuel Dam: lessons for hydroelectric development policy and the environment in Amazonia. Environ Manage 2005, 35(1):1-19.
41. Fearnside P. Dams in the Amazon: Belo Monte and Brazil's hydroelectric development of the Xingu River Basin. Environ Manage 2006, 38(1):16-27.
42. Feiring B. Understanding the Indigenous and Tribal people Convention, 1989 (No. 169): Handbook for ILO tripartite constituents 2013, International Labour Organization, Geneva.
43. Fernandes R.C. Produto e processo: desafios para o antropólogoa na elaboração de laudos de impacto ambiental. Laudos Periciais Antropológicos em Debate 2005, 191-206. Nova Letra, Florianópolis. I.B. Leite (Ed.).
44. Figueiredo C., Pedroso O. Licenciamento ambiental e comunidades Indígenas 2011, Programa de Comunicação Indígena UHE Belo Monte, Brazil. 1st ed.
45. FPW Mining Council's "new" commitment to FPIC falls short [Homepage of First Peoples Worldwide], [Online] Available, [2013, August 6]. http://firstpeoples.org/wp/mining-councils-new-commitment-to-fpic-falls-short/.
46. Franks D.M., Vanclay F. Social impact management plans: innovation in corporate and public policy. Environ Impact Assess Rev 2013, 43:40-48.
47. FUNAI Termo de referência. Estudos socioambientais do componente Indígena no âmbito do EIA-RIMA do projeto AHE Belo Monte 2008, Fundação Nacional do Índio, Brasília.
48. Gamble D.J. The Berger Inquiry: an impact assessment process. Science 1978, 199(4332):946-952.
49. Gilberthorpe E. Community development in Ok Tedi, Papua New Guinea: the role of anthropology in the extractive industries. Commun Dev J 2013, 48(3):466-483.
50. Glasson J., Salvador N.N.B. EIA in Brazil: a procedures-practice gap. A comparative study with reference to the European Union, and especially the UK. Environ Impact Assess Rev 2000, 2(20):191-225.
51. Goldemberg J., Lucon O. Energia e meio ambiente no Brasil. Estud Avançados 2007, 59(21):7-20.
52. Gordon C. Economia Selvagem: Ritual e Mercadoria entre os Índios Xikrin-Mebêngôkre 2006, UNESP/ISA/NuTI, São Paulo.
53. Guzmán D. Índios misturados, caboclos e curibocas: análise histórica de um processo de mestiçagem, Rio Negro (Brasil), séculos XVIII e XIX. Sociedades Caboclas Amazônicas: Modernidade e invisibilidade 2006, 67-78. Annablume, São Paulo. C. Adams, R. Murrieta, W. Neves (Eds.).
54. Hanna P., Vanclay F. Human rights, Indigenous peoples and the concept of free, prior and informed consent. Impact Assess Proj Apprais 2013, 31(2):146-157.
55. Henriksen G. Consultancy and advocacy as radical anthropology. Expert knowledge: first world peoples, consultancy and anthropology 2004, 67-79. Berghahn Books, New York. B. Morris, R. Bastin (Eds.).
56. Herbert B. Fortescue accused of rigging land rights deal [Homepage of ABC], [Online] Available, [2013, July 25]. http://www.abc.net.au/news/2012-11-20/fmg-accused-of-rigging-meeting/4382826.
57. Hill C., Lillywhite S., Simon M. Guide to free prior and informed consent 2010, Oxfam, Australia, Carlton.
58. Huntington H.P. Using traditional ecological knowledge in science: methods and applications. Ecol Appl 2000, 10(5):1270-1274.
59. IBAMA Termo de referência para elaboração de EIA/RIMA de aproveitamento hidreletrico 2005, Instituto Brasileiro do Meio Ambiente e dos Recursos Naturais Renováveis, Brasília.
60. IBAMA Análise do 3° relatório consolidado de andamento do projeto básico ambiental e das condicionantes da licença de instalação 795/2011, da usina hidrelétrica Belo Monte, processo 02001.001848/2006-75 2013, [Brasília].
61. ICMM Indigenous peoples and mining: good practice guide 2010, International Council on Mining and Metals, London.
62. ICMM Indigenous peoples and mining - position statement May 2013 [Homepage of International Council on Mining and Metals], [Online] Available, [2013, 12 November]. http://www.icmm.com/document/5433.
63. IFC Performance standard 7 - Indigenous peoples. International Finance Corporation's performance standards on social and environmental sustainability 2012, International Finance Corporation, Washington.
64. ILO Indigenous and Tribal peoples Convention: C169 1989, International Labour Organization, Geneva.
65. ILO Report of the committee of experts on the application of conventions and recommendations (report III - Part 1A) 2012, International Labour Organization, Geneva.
66. Inglez de Souza C., Giannini I. Estudo etnoecológico na Terra Indígena Xikrin do Cateté 2005, Relatório Final, Brasília.
67. Ingold T. The perception of the environment: essays in livelihood, dwelling and skill 2000, Routledge, London.
68. ISA A Convenção 169 da OIT no Brasil [Homepage of Instituto Socioambiental], [Online] Available, [2013, 28 August]. http://www.socioambiental.org/inst/esp/consulta_previa/?q=convencao-169-da-oit-no-brasil.
69. ISA Indigenous peoples [Homepage of Instituto Socioambiental], [Online] Available, [2013, August 21]. http://pib.socioambiental.org/en/c/no-brasil-atual/quem-sao/povos-indigenas.
70. ISA Índios isolados [Homepage of Instituto Socioambiental], [Online] Available, [2013, 02 September]. http://pib.socioambiental.org/pt/c/no-brasil-atual/quem-sao/Indios-isolados.
71. ISA Porque a Justiça não consegue decidir sobre Belo Monte, [Homepage of Instituto Socioambiental], [Online] Available, [2013, 20 January]. https://www.socioambiental.org/pt-br/blog/blog-do-xingu/porque-a-justica-nao-consegue-decidir-sobre-o-caso-de-belo-monte.
72. IWGIA The Indigenous World 2013 2013, The International Work Group for Indigenous Affairs, Copenhagen.
73. Jampolsky J.A. Activism is the new black! Demonstrating the benefits of international celebrity activism through James Cameron's campaign against the Belo Monte Dam. Colo J Int Environ Law Policy 2012, 23:227-256.
74. Jijelava D., Vanclay F. Assessing the social licence to operate of development cooperation organizations: the case of Mercy Corps in Samtskhe-Javakheti, Georgia. Soc Epistemol 2014, [in press].
75. João E., Vanclay F., den Broeder L. Emphasising enhancement in all forms of impact assessment. Impact Assess Proj Apprais 2011, 29(3):170-180.
76. Lane M.B., Corbett T. The tyranny of localism: Indigenous participation in community-based environmental management. J Environ Policy Plan 2005, 7(2):141-159.
77. Little P.E. Territórios sociais e povos tradicionais no Brasil: por uma antropologia da territorialidade. Annu Antropol 2003, 2003:251-290.
78. Magalhães S., Hernandez F. Painel de especialistas: análise crítica do estudo de impacto ambiental do aproveitamento hidrelétrico de Belo Monte, Belém 2009.
79. Mauro F., Hardison P.D. Traditional knowledge of Indigenous and local communities: international debate and policy initiatives. Ecol Appl 2000, 10(5):1263-1269.
80. Medeiros E., Braga J. Governo negocia libertação de biólogos sequestrados por índios no Pará [Homepage of Correio Braziliense], [Online] Available, [2013, September 10]. http://www.correiobraziliense.com.br/app/noticia/brasil/2013/06/23/interna_brasil,372901/governo-negocia-libertacao-de-biologos-sequestrados-por-indios-no-para.shtml.
81. Miranda L. The hybrid state-corporate enterprise and violations of Indigenous land rights: theorizing corporate responsibility and accountability under international law. Lewis Clark Law Rev 2007, 11:135-183.
82. Morgan R.K. Environmental impact assessment: the state of the art. Impact Assess Proj Apprais 2012, 1(30):5-14.
83. Morrison-Saunders A., Arts J. Assessing impact: handbook of EIA and SEA follow-up 2004, Earthscan, London.
84. Morrison-Saunders A., Early G. What is necessary to ensure natural justice in environmental impact assessment decision-making?. Impact Assess Proj Apprais 2008, 26(1):29-42.
85. O'Faircheallaigh C. Making social impact assessment count: a negotiation-based approach for Indigenous peoples. Soc Nat Resour 1999, 1(12):63-80.
86. O'Faircheallaigh C. Environmental agreements, EIA follow-up and Aboriginal participation in environmental management: the Canadian experience. Environ Impact Assess Rev 2007, 27(4):319-342.
87. O'Faircheallaigh C. Aboriginal-mining company contractual agreements in Australia and Canada: implications for political autonomy and community development. Can J Dev Stud 2010, 30(1-2):69-86.
88. O'Faircheallaigh C. Extractive industries and Indigenous peoples: a changing dynamic?. J Rural Stud 2013, 30:20-30.
89. O'Faircheallaigh C., Corbett T. Indigenous participation in environmental management of mining projects: the role of negotiated agreements. Environ Polit 2005, 14(5):629-647.
90. OHCHR Declaración pública del Relator Especial sobre los derechos humanos y libertades fundamentales de los Indígenas, James Anaya, sobre la "Ley del derecho a la consulta previa a los pueblos indígenas u originarios reconocido en el Convenio No. 169 de la Organización Internacional de Trabajo" aprobada por el Congreso de la República del Perú [Homepage of Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights], [Online] Available, [2013, September 09]. http://www.ohchr.org/SP/NewsEvents/Pages/DisplayNews.aspx?NewsID=10194&LangID=S.
91. Oliveira JPd Uma etnologia dos 'índios misturados'? Situação colonial, territorialização e fluxos culturais. Mana 1998, 4(1):47-77.
92. Oliveira JEd Sobre a necessidade do trabalho antropológico para o licenciamento ambiental: avaliação dos impactos socioambientais gerados a partir da pavimentação asfáltica da Rodovia MS-384 sobre a comunidade Kaiowa de Ñande Ru Marangatu. Rev Electron Hist Reflect 2010, 7(4). [Online, Available http://www.periodicos.ufgd.edu.br/index.php/historiaemreflexao/article/view/754/470].
93. Posey D. Indigenous management of tropical forest ecosystems: the case of the Kayapó indians of the Brazilian Amazon. Agrofor Syst 1985, 3(2):139-158.
94. Posey D. Diachronic ecotones and anthropogenic landscapes in Amazonia: contesting the consciousness of conservation. Adv Hist Ecol 1998, 104-118.
95. Posey D. Upsetting the sacred balance: can the study of Indigenous knowledge reflect cosmic connectedness?. Participating in development: approaches to indigenous knowledge 2002, 24-42. Routledge, London. P. Sillitoe, A. Bicker, J. Pottier (Eds.).
96. Prenzel P., Vanclay F. How social impact assessment can contribute to conflict management. Environ Impact Assess Rev 2014, 45:30-37.
97. Prno J., Slocombe S.D. Exploring the origins of 'social licence to operate' in the mining sector: perspectives from governance and sustainability theories. Resour Policy 2012, 37:346-357.
98. Rocha L. Belo Monte derruba presidente do Ibama [Homepage of Revista Época], [Online] Available, [2013, September 09]. http://colunas.revistaepoca.globo.com/politico/2011/01/12/belo-monte-derruba-presidente-do-ibama/.
99. Sallenave J. Giving traditional ecological knowledge its rightful place in environmental impact assessment. North Perspect 1994, 22(1):16-18.
100. Sanson C. Povos indígenas: Um estorvo ao modelo da esquerda [Homepage of Radioagência NP], [Online] Available, [2013, September 2]. http://www.radioagencianp.com.br/11577-povos-indigenas-um-estorvo-ao-modelo-da-esquerda.
101. Santilli M. Impactos subavaliados em grandes obras [Homepage of O Globo], [Online] Available, [2013, August 21]. http://oglobo.globo.com/amanha/impactos-subavaliados-em-grandes-obras-7780720.
102. Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity Akwé: Kon voluntary guidelines for the conduct of cultural, environmental and social impact assessment regarding developments proposed to take place on, or which are likely to impact on, sacred sites and on lands and waters traditionally occupied or used by Indigenous and local communities [Homepage of Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity], [Online] Available, [2013, August 28]. https://www.cbd.int/doc/publications/akwe-brochure-en.pdf.
103. Sevá Filho A., Pinheiro M.F. Conflitos sociais e institucionais na concretização recente de algumas concessões de aproveitamentos hidrelétricos assinadas entre 1997 e 2000. XI Congresso Brasileiro de Energia 2006, UFRJ, Rio de Janeiro.
104. Sider G. Lumbee Indian cultural nationalism and ethnogenesis. Dialect Anthropol 1976, 1(2):161-172.
105. Slootweg R., Vanclay F., van Schooten M. Function evaluation as a framework for the integration of social and environmental impact assessment. Impact Assess Proj Apprais 2001, 19(1):19-28.
106. Stavenhagen R. Etnodesenvolvimento: uma dimensão ignorada no pensamento desenvolvimentista. Annu Antropol 1985, 84:13-56.
107. Stevenson M.G. Indigenous knowledge in environmental assessment. Arctic 1996, 49(3):278-291.
108. Tsuji L.J., Ho E. Traditional environmental knowledge and western science: in search of common ground. Can J Nativ Stud 2002, 22(2):327-360.
109. UN General Assembly United Nations Declaration on the rights of Indigenous peoples 2007, UN General Assembly, New York, [A/RES/61/295].
110. United Nations The concept of Indigenous peoples 2004, United Nations Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues Secretariat, New York, [PFII/2004/WS.1/3].
111. United Nations Guiding principles on business and human rights: implementing the United Nations "protect, respect and remedy" framework 2011, United Nations, New York, [HR/PUB/11/04].
112. UN-REDD Guidelines on free, prior and informed consent 2013, UN-REDD Programme Secretariat, Geneva.
113. Usher P.J. Traditional ecological knowledge in environmental assessment and management. Arctic 2000, 53(2):183-193.
114. Utsunomiya R., Montaño M. Análise do enfoque no meio antrópico em estudos de impacto ambiental para verificação de viabilidade ambiental de projetos de desenvolvimento. VI Congresso de Meio Ambiente da Associação de Universidades Grupo de Montevidéu 2009, UFSCar, São Carlos.
115. Vanclay F. Conceptualising social impacts. Environ Impact Assess Rev 2002, 22(3):183-211.
116. Vanclay F. International principles for social impact assessment. Impact Assess Proj Apprais 2003, 21(1):5-11.
117. Vanclay F. Developments in Social impact assessment: an introduction to a collection of seminal research papers. Developments in social impact assessment 2014, 15-39. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham. F. Vanclay (Ed.).
118. Vanclay F., Esteves A.M. Current issues and trends in social impact assessment. New directions in social impact assessment: conceptual and methodological advances 2011, 3-19. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham. F. Vanclay, A.M. Esteves (Eds.).
119. Vanclay F., Baines J., Taylor C.N. Principles of ethical social research: ethical professional practice Part I. Impact Assess Proj Apprais 2013, 31(4):243-253.
120. Verdum R. As obras de infraestrutura do PAC e os povos indígenas na Amazônia brasileira. Nota Técnica 2012, 9.
121. Vieira W. Quanto vale um índio? [Homepage of Carta Capital], [Online] Available, [2013, September 12]. http://www.cartanaescola.com.br/single/show/49.
122. Viveiros de Castro E. No Brasil, todo mundo é índio, exceto quem não é [Homepage of Instituto Socioambiental], [Online] Available, [2013, August 26]. http://pib.socioambiental.org/files/file/PIB_institucional/No_Brasil_todo_mundo_%C3%A9_%C3%ADndio.pdf.
123. Voss M., Greenspan E. Community consent index: oil, gas and mining company public positions on Free, Prior, and Informed Consent (FPIC) [Homepage of Oxfam America], [Online] Available, [2013, September 09]. http://www.oxfamamerica.org/publications/community-consent-index.
124. Watts J. Amazon tribe threatens to declare war amid row over Brazilian dam project [Homepage of The Guardian], [Online] Available, [2013, 13 August]. http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2013/apr/03/brazil-dam-activists-war-military.
125. Weisman B.R. Nativism, resistance, and ethnogenesis of the Florida Seminole Indian identity. Hist Archaeol 2007, 41(4):198-212.
126. Wessels J. Factors that influence the independence of EIA follow-up verifiers: a developing country perspective. Impact Assess Proj Apprais 2013, 3(31):169-179.
127. Whitten N.E. Ecuadorian ethnocide and Indigenous ethnogenesis: Amazonian resurgence amidst Andean colonialism. International Work Group for Indigenous Affairs Document 1976, (23).
128. Wiles A., McEwen J., Sadar M.H. Use of traditional ecological knowledge in environmental assessment of uranium mining in the Athabasca Saskatchewan. Impact Assess Proj Apprais 1999, 17(2):107-114.
129. Wood C. Environmental impact assessment: a comparative review 2003, Pearson Education, Essex. 2nd ed.
130. World Bank Operational Policy 4.10 on Indigenous peoples 2005, World Bank, Washington.
131. World Bank Environmental licensing for hydroelectric projects in Brazil: a contribution to the debate. Summary report 2008, vol. 1. World Bank Latin America and the Caribbean Regional Office Brazil country, Management unit, Washington.
132. Ypade Povos e comunidades [Homepage of Portal Ypade], [Online] Available, [2013, August 19]. http://www.caa.org.br/ypade/index.php?pg=11.