Dimethyl sulfoxide could be a useful probe to evaluate unusual skin angioneurotic reaction and epidermal permeability

Cutaneous and Ocular Toxicology

Volumn 33, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 63-69

  Chen, Shuang Y ^a,b   Wang, Xue M ^b   Liu, Yan Q ^a   Gao, Yan R ^c   Liu, Xiao P ^c   Li, Shu Y ^d   Dong, Ya Q ^a  

^a XUZHOU MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b Shanghai Skin Disease Hospital   (China)

^c ANHUI MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^d TONGJI UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Angioneurotic reaction; Chemical probe; Non invasive methods; Permeability

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANGIOEDEMA; DIMETHYL SULFOXIDE; FEMALE; HEALTHY VOLUNTEERS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PERMEABILITY; SKIN; SKIN ABSORPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84894310065     PISSN: 15569527     EISSN: 15569535     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/15569527.2013.821615     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Coverly J, Peters L, Whittle E, Basketter DA. Susceptibility to skin stinging, non-immunologic contact urticaria and acute skin irritation; is there a relationship? Contact Dermatitis 1998;38: 90-95
2. Frosch P, Duncan S, Kligman AM. Cutaneous biometries I, The response of human skin to dimethyl sulfoxide. Br J Dermatol 1980;102:263-274.
3. Barry BW, Bennett SL. Effect of penetration enhancers on the permeation of mannitol, hydrocortisone and progesterone through human skin. J Pharm Pharmacol 1987;39:535-546.
4. Lahti A, Maibach HI. An animal model for nonimmunologic contact urticaria. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 1984;76:219-224.
5. Malten KE, Aried JD. Topical toxicity of various concentrations of DMSO recorded with impedance measurements and water vapour loss measurements. Contact Dermatitis 1978;4:80-92.
6. Farage MA. Perception of sensitive skin:changes in perceived severity and associations with environmental causes. Contact Dermatitis 2008;59:226-232.
7. Willis CM, Shaw S, De Lacharriere O, et al. Sensitive skin:an epidemiological study. Br J Dermatol 2001;145:258-263.
8. Agner T, Serup J. Quantification of the DMSO-response-a test for assessment of sensitive skin. Clin Exp Dermatol 1989;14: 214-217.
9. Diffey BL, Farr PM. Quantitative aspects of ultraviolet erythema. Clin Phys Physiol Meas 1991;12:311-325.
10. Westerhof W. CIE colorimetry. In: Serup J, Jemec G, eds. In vivo examination of the skin: a handbook of non-invasive methods. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 1995:385-397.
11. Vishwanath K, Chang K, Klein D, et al. Portable, fiber-based, diffuse reflection spectroscopy (DRS) systems for estimating tissue optical properties. Appl Spectrosc 2011;62:206-215.
12. Tenland T. On laser Doppler flowmetry. Lmkopmg Umversily, Medical Dissertations 1182; 1.
13. Robinson MK, Perkins MA. Evaluation of a quantitative clinical method for assessment of sensory skin irritation. Contact Dermatitis 2001;45:205-213.
14. Farage MA, Katsarou A, Maibach HI. Sensory, clinical and physiological factors in sensitive skin: a review. Contact Dermatitis 2006;55:1-14.
15. Marriott M, Holmes J, Peters L, et al. The complex problem of sensitive skin. Contact Dermatitis 2005;53:93-99.
16. Issachar N, Gall Y, Borrel MT, et al. Correlation between percutaneous penetration of methyl nicotinate and sensitive skin, using laser Doppler imaging. Contact Dermatitis 1998;39: 182-186.
17. Peker J, Whalbas W. Zur methodik der pH-messung der hautberflacae. Dermatologische Wochenschrift 1972;158: 572-578.
18. Berardesca E, Cespa M. Sodium lauryl sulphate induced cutaneous irritation. Contact Dermatitis 1988;19:136-140.
19. Takiwaki H, Serup J. Measurement of erythema and melanin indices. In: Serup J, Jemec G, eds. In vivo examination of the skin: a handbook of non-invasive methods. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 1995:377-384.
20. Clarys P, Alewaeters K. Skin color measurements: comparison between three instruments: the Chromameter-the DermaSpectrometer-and the Mexameter-. Skin Res Technol 2000;6:230-238.
21. Notman R, den Otter WK. The permeability enhancing mechanism of DMSO in ceramide bilayers simulated by molecular dynamics. Biophys J 2007;93:2056-2068.
22. Kwak S, Lafleur M. Effect of dimethyl sulfoxide on the phase behavior of model stratum corneumlipid mixtures. Chem Phys Lipids 2009;161:11-21.
23. Olerud JE, Usui ML, Seckin D, et al. Neutral endopeptidase expression and distribution in human skin and wounds. J Invest Dermatol 1999;112:873-881.
24. Li Y, Hsieh ST, Chien HF, et al. Sensory and motor denervation influence epidermal thickness in rat foot glabrous skin. Exp Neurol 1997;147:452-462.