An analysis of the precision and reliability of the leap motion sensor and its suitability for static and dynamic tracking

Sensors (Switzerland)

Volumn 14, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 3702-3720

  Guna, Jože ^a   Jakus, Grega ^a   Pogačnik, Matevž ^a   Tomažič, Sašo ^a   Sodnik, Jaka ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LJUBLJANA   (Slovenia)

Author keywords

Leap motion controller; Motion capture system; Precision measurement; Spatial distortion measurement

Indexed keywords

EID: 84894284964     PISSN: 14248220     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/s140203702     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Oviatt, S. User-centered modeling and evaluation of multimodal interfaces. Proc. IEEE 2003, 91, 1457-1468.
2. Matthew, T. Multimodal interaction: A review. Pattern Recognit. Lett. 2014, 36, 189-195.
3. Bhuiyan, M.; Picking, R. Gesture-Controlled User Interfaces, What Have We Done and What's Next? In Proceedings of the Fifth Collaborative Research Symposium on Security, E-Learning, Internet and Networking (SEIN 2009), Darmstadt, Germany, 25-29 November 2009; pp. 26-27.
4. Wingrave, C.A.; Williamson, B.; Varcholik, P.D.; Rose, J.; Miller, A.; Charbonneau, E.; Bott, J.; LaViola, J.J. The wiimote and beyond: Spatially convenient devices for 3D user interfaces. IEEE Comput. Graph. Appl. 2010, 30, 71-85.
5. Zhang, Z. Microsoft kinect sensor and its effect. IEEE MultiMedia 2012, 19, 4-10.
6. Leap Motion Controller. Available online: https://www.leapmotion.com (accessed on 19 February 2014).
7. Hodson, H. Leap motion hacks show potential of new gesture tech. New Sci. 2013, 218, 21.
8. Aziz, A.A.; Wan, K.; Zaaba, S.K.; Shahriman, A.B; Adnan, N.H.; Nor, R.M.; Ayob, M.N.; Ismail, A.H.; Ramly, M.F. Development of a gesture database for an adaptive gesture recognition system. Int. J. Electr. Comput. Sci. 2012, 12, 38-44.
9. Qualisys Motion Capture System. Available online: http://www.qualisys.com (accessed on 19 February 2014).
10. Khoshelham, K.; Elberink, S.O. Accuracy and resolution of kinect depth data for indoor mapping applications. Sensors 2012, 12, 1437-1454.
11. Teather, R.J.; Pavlovych, A.; Stuerzlinger, W.; MacKenzie, I.S. Effects of Tracking Technology, Latency, and Spatial Jitter on Object Movement. In Proceedings of the IEEE Symposium on 3D User Interfaces, Lafayette, LA, USA, 14-15 March 2009; pp. 43-50.
12. Hernoux, F.; Béarée, R.; Gajny, L.; Nyiri, E.; Bancalin, J.; Gibaru, O. Leap Motion pour la capture de mouvement 3D par spline L1. Application à la robotique. Journées du Groupe de Travail en Modélisation Géométrique 2013, Marseille. (in French)
13. Vikram, S. Handwriting and Gestures in the Air, Recognizing on the Fly. In Proceedings of the CHI 2013 Extended Abstracts, Paris, France, 27 April-2 May 2013.
14. Regenbrecht, H.; Collins, J.; Hoermann, S. A Leap-Supported, Hybrid AR Interface Approach. In Proceedings of the OZCHI'13, 25th Australian Computer-Human Interaction Conference: Augmentation, Application, Innovation, Collaboration, Adelaide, Australia, 25-29 November 2013.
15. Weichert, F.; Bachmann, D.; Rudak, B.; Fisseler, D. Analysis of the accuracy and robustness of the leap motion controller. Sensors 2013, 13, 6380-6393.