Impacts of updated emission inventories on source apportionment of fine particle and ozone over the southeastern U.S.

Atmospheric Environment

Volumn 88, Issue , 2014, Pages 133-154

  Zhang, Yang ^a   Wang, Wei ^a,b   Wu, Shiang Yuh ^c   Wang, Kai ^a   Minoura, Hiroaki ^d   Wang, Zifa ^b  

^a NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b INSTITUTE OF ATMOSPHERIC PHYSICS   (China)

^c Department of Air Quality and Environmental Management ^*  (United States)

^d North America Inc   (United States)

Author keywords

Brute force sensitivity analysis; CMAQ; National Emission Inventory; O3; PM2.5; Source apportionment

Indexed keywords

EID: 84894282134     PISSN: 13522310     EISSN: 18732844     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.01.035     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. AIRPARIS Source Apportionment of Airborne Particles in the ILE-DE-France Region 2012, Final Report, AIRPARIC, Paris, France, (last access 11.01.14.). http://www.airparif.asso.fr/_pdf/publications/%20rapport-particules-anglais-120829.pdf.
2. Baek J., Park S.K., Russell A.G. Source apportionment of fine organic aerosol using CMAQ tracers. Proceedings of the Models-3 User's Workshop, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 2005.
3. Barnard W.R., Sabo E. Documentation of the Base G2 and Best & Final 2002 Base Year, 2009 and 2018 Emission Inventories for VISTAS 2008, Final Report Prepared by MACTEC Engineering and Consulting, Inc. For the Visibility Improvement State and Tribal Association of the Southeast (VISTAS), March 14 2008.
4. 2.5using organic markers measured in the southeastern U.S. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2007, 41:1577-1583.
5. 2.5 over the eastern U.S. using CMAQ, part I. Source sensitivity simulations using CMAQ with the brute force method. Atmos. Pollut. Res. 2011, 2:300-317.
6. 2.5 over the eastern U.S. using CMAQ, part II: source apportionment simulations using CAMx/PSAT and comparisons with CMAQ source sensitivity simulations. Atmos. Pollut. Res. 2011, 2:318-336.
7. Dunker A.M. The decoupled direct method for calculating sensitivity coefficients in chemical kinetics. J.Chem. Phys. 1984, 81:2385.
8. EPA Emissions Inventory Final Rule Technical Support Document (TSD), for the final Transport Rule, Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0491 2011, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air and Radiation, and Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, Air Quality Assessment Division, June 28, 120 p.
9. ESA21 Vehicle Emissions 2008, (last access 11.01.14.). http://esa21.kennesaw.edu/activities/smog-cars/doe-veh-pollutants.pdf.
10. Hakami A., Odman M.-T., Russell A.G. High-order, direct sensitivity analysis of multidimensional air quality models. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2003, 37:2442-2452.
11. Henze D.K., Hakami A., Seinfeld J.H. Development of the adjoint of GEOS-Chem. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2007, 7:2413-2433.
12. Koo B., Wilson G.M., Morris R.E., Dunker A.M., Yarwood G. Comparison of source apportionment and sensitivity analysis in a particulate matter air quality model. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2009, 43:6669-6675.
13. Martin P., Refregier P., Galland F., Guerault F. Nonparametric statistical snake based on the minimum stochastic complexity. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2006, 28(9):1493-1500.
14. Morris R.E., Koo B., Wang B., Stella G., McNally D., Loomis C., Chien C.-J., Tonnesen G. Technical Support Document for VISTAS Emissions and Air Quality Modeling to Support Regional Haze State Implementation Plans 2009, Final Report, ENVIRON, Novata, CA.
15. Napelenok S.L., Cohan D.S., Hu Y., Russell A.G. Decoupled direct 3D sensitivity analysis for particulate matter (DDM-3D/PM). Atmos. Environ. 2006, 20:6112-6121.
16. Olerud D., Sims A. MM5 2002 Modeling in Support of VISTAS Reports August 2004, Baron Advanced Meteorological Systems, LLC, Raleigh, NC.
17. Pouliot G., Pierce T., Denier van der Gon H., Schaap M., Moran M., Nopmongcol U. Comparing emission inventories and model-ready emission datasets between Europe and North America for the AQMEII project. Atmos. Environ. 2012, 53:4-14.
18. Pun B.K., Seigneur C., Bailey E.M., Gautney L.L., Douglas S.G., Haney J.L., Kumar N. Response of atmospheric particulate matter to changes in precursor emissions: a comparison of three air quality models. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2008, 42:831-837.
19. th Annual CMAS Models-3 User's Conference, Chapel Hill, NC, September 26-28 2005.
20. 2.5: a Georgia case study. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2009, 43:299-305.
21. Vautard R., Honoré C., Beekmann M., Rouil L. Simulation of ozone during the August 2003 heat wave and emission control scenarios. Atmos. Environ. 2005, 39:2957-2967.
22. Wang L.-T., Xu J., Yang J., Zhao X.-J., Wei W., Cheng D.-D., Pan X.-M., Su J. Understanding haze pollution over the southern Hebei area of China using the CMAQ model. Atmos. Environ. 2012, 56:69-79.
23. Wang L.T., Wei Z., Yang, J., Zhang P., Zhao X.J., Zhang F.F., Su J., Meng C.C., Zhang Y., Zhang Q. The 2013 Severe haze over the southern Hebei, China: model evaluation, source apportionment, and policy implications. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2014, (in press).
24. Yarwood G., Wilson G., Morris R. Final Report: Development of the CAMx Particulate Source Apportionment Technology (PSAT) 2005, ENVIRON International Corporation, Prepared for Lake Michigan Air Directors Consortium.
25. Zhang Y., Vijayaraghavan K., Seigneur C. Evaluation of three probing techniques in a three-dimensional air quality model. J.Geophys. Res. 2005, 110:D02305. 10.1029/2004JD005248.
26. Zhang Y., Liu P., Pun B., Seigneur C. Acomprehensive performance evaluation of MM5-CMAQ for the summer 1999 southern oxidants study episode, part III. Diagnostic and mechanistic evaluations. Atmos. Environ. 2006, 40:4856-4873.
27. Zhang Y., Liu P., Pun B., Seigneur C. Acomprehensive performance evaluation of MM5-CMAQ for summer 1999 southern oxidants study episode, part-I. Evaluation protocols, databases and meteorological predictions. Atmos. Environ. 2006, 40:4825-4838.
28. Zhang Y., Liu P., Queen A., Misenis C., Pun B., Seigneur C., Wu S.-Y. Acomprehensive performance evaluation of MM5-CMAQ for summer 1999 southern oxidants study episode, part-II. Gas and aerosol predictions. Atmos. Environ. 2006, 40:4839-4855.
29. 3 and PM pollution in the U.S., part II. An examination of formation mechanisms through a process analysis technique and sensitivity study. J.Geophys. Res. 2009, 114:D22305. 10.1029/2009JD011900.
30. Zhang Y., Olsen K., Wang K. Fine scale modeling of agricultural air quality over the Southeastern United States using two air quality models, part I. Application and evaluation. Aerosol Air Qual. Res. 2013, 13(4):1231-1252.