Re-visioning action: Participatory action research and indigenous theories of change

Urban Review

Volumn 41, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 47-65

  Tuck, Eve ^a  

^a STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

Author keywords

Action; Balance; Epistemology; Indigenous; Participatory action research; Reform and revolution; Sovereignty; Theories of change

Indexed keywords

EID: 84894269724     PISSN: 00420972     EISSN: 15731960     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11256-008-0094-x     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Adelman, C. (1997). Action research and the problem of participation. In R. McTaggart (Ed.), Participatory action research: International contexts and consequences (pp. 79-106). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
2. Alfred, G. R. (2005). Wasase: Indigenous pathways of action and freedom. Peterborough, Ont: Broadview Press.
3. Anzaldúa, G. (1999). Borderlands/La Frontera, the new Meztiza. San Francisco: Aunte Lute Press.
4. Boal, A. (2002). Games for actors and non-actors. London, NewYork: Routledge.
5. Brayboy, B. M. J. (2008). 'Yakkity yak' and 'talking back' an examination of sites of survivance in indigenous knowledge. In M. Villegas, S. R. Neugebauer, & K. R. Venegas (Eds.), Indigenous knowledge and education: Sites of struggle, strength and survivance. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
6. Deloria, V. (1988). Custer died for your sins: An Indian manifesto. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
7. Denis, C. (1997). We are not you: First nations and Canadian modernity. Peterborough: Broadview Press.
8. Ferreira, E., & Ferreira, J. (1997). Making sense of the media: A handbook of popular education techniques. New York: Monthly Review Press.
9. Fine, M., Tuck, E., & Zeller-Berkman, S. (2007). Do you believe in Geneva? In C. McCarthy, A. Durham, L. Engel, A. Filmer, M. Giardina, & M. Malagreca (Eds.), Globalizing cultural studies. New York: Peter Lang Publications.
10. Gingrich-Philbrook, C. (2005). Autoethnography's family values: Easy access to compulsory experiences. Text and Performance Quarterly, 25(4), 297-314.
11. Grande, S. (2004). Red pedagogy: Native American social and political thought. Lanham, Md: Oxford Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
12. Grande, S. (2008). Educational desire as decolonization. In J. Cammarota & M. Fine (Eds.), Revolutionizing education: Youth participatory action research in motion. New York: Routledge.
13. Josselson, R. (2004). The hermeneutics of faith and the hermeneutics of suspicion. Narrative Inquiry, 14(1), 1-28.
14. Laenui, P. K. (1994). Straight talk on hawaiian sovereignty. http://www.opihi.com/sovereignty/hsacupda. txt, Last accessed May 13, 2008.
15. Lyons, S. R. (2007). In vine veritas. In E. Gansworth (Ed.), Sovereign bones. New York: Nation Books.
16. Smith, G. H. (2000). Protecting and respecting indigenous knowledge. In M. Battiste (Ed.), Reclaiming indigenous voices and vision (pp. 209-224). Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.
17. Tuck, E. (2008). Theorizing back: An approach to participatory policy analysis. In J. Anyon, M. Dumas, D. Linville, K. Nolan, M. Perez, E. Tuck, & J. Weiss (Eds.), Using theory in empirical research on education. New York: Routledge.
18. Tuck, E., Allen, J., Bacha, M., Morales, A., Quinter, S., Thompson, J., et al. (2008). PAR praxes for now and future change. In J. Cammarota & M. Fine (Eds.), Revolutionizing education: youth participatory action research in motion. New York: Routledge.
19. Tuck, E. in conversation with Fine, M. (2007). Inner angles: A range of ethical responses to/with Indigenous and decolonizing theories. In N. Denzin & M. Giardina (Eds.), Ethical futures in qualitative research: Decolonizing the politics of knowledge. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
20. Vizenor, G. R. (1994). Manifest manners: Postindian warriors of survivance. Hanover, N_H: Wesleyan University Press, University Press of New England.
21. Zeller-Berkman, S. (2007). Act now, not only later! Taking action seriously in PAR. Chicago, IL: American Educational Research Association presentation.