Nanoscale interactions of polyethylene glycol with thermo-mechanically pre-treated Pinus radiata biofuel substrate

Biotechnology and Bioengineering

Volumn 111, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 719-725

  Donaldson, Lloyd A ^a   Newman, Roger H ^a   Vaidya, Alankar ^a  

^a SCION   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Biofuel substrate; Cellulase; Cellulose; Fluorescence microscopy; FRET; Polyethyleneglycol; Radiata pine

Indexed keywords

BIOFUELS; CELLULOSE; ENERGY TRANSFER; FLUORESCENCE MICROSCOPY; FORESTRY; LIGNIN; NANOTECHNOLOGY; PLANTS (BOTANY); POLYETHYLENE GLYCOLS;

CELLULASE; CONFOCAL FLUORESCENCE MICROSCOPY; FRET; LIGNOCELLULOSIC SUBSTRATES; MOLECULAR LEVEL INTERACTIONS; NANOSCALE INTERACTIONS; RADIATA PINE; RESONANCE ENERGY TRANSFER;

SUBSTRATES;

BIOFUEL; LIGNIN; MACROGOL;

ABSORPTION SPECTROSCOPY; ARTICLE; BLEACHING; BRIGHTNESS; CONFOCAL MICROSCOPY; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENERGY TRANSFER; FLUORESCENCE MICROSCOPY; FLUORESCENCE RESONANCE ENERGY TRANSFER; FORSTER RESONANCE ENERGY TRANSFER; MOLECULAR INTERACTION; NONHUMAN; PINE; PINUS RADIATA;

CELLULASE; CELLULOSE; ENERGY TRANSFER; FLUORESCENCE; FORESTRY; LIGNINS; PINUS RADIATA; POLYETHYLENE GLYCOL; SUBSTRATES;

PINUS RADIATA; RADIATA;

BIOFUEL SUBSTRATE; CELLULASE; CELLULOSE; FLUORESCENCE MICROSCOPY; FRET; POLYETHYLENEGLYCOL; RADIATA PINE;

BIOFUELS; FLUORESCENCE RESONANCE ENERGY TRANSFER; LIGNIN; MICROSCOPY, FLUORESCENCE; NANOSTRUCTURES; PINUS; POLYETHYLENE GLYCOLS;

EID: 84894266457     PISSN: 00063592     EISSN: 10970290     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/bit.25138     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Bailey MJ, Nevalainen KMH. 1981. Induction, isolation and testing of stable Trichoderma reesei mutants with improved production of solubilising cellulose. Enzyme Microb Technol 3:153-157.
2. Börjesson J, Engqvist M, Sipos B, Tjerneld F. 2007a. Effect of poly(ethylene glycol) on enzymatic hydrolysis and adsorption of cellulase enzymes to pre-treated lignocellulose. Enzyme Microb Technol 41:186-195.
3. Börjesson J, Peterson R, Tjerneld F. 2007b. Enhanced enzymatic conversion of softwood lignocellulose by poly(ethylene glycol) addition. Enzyme Microb Technol 40:754-762.
4. Bubner P, Dohr J, Plank H, Mayrhofer C, Nidetzky B. 2012. Cellulases dig deep. In situ observation of the mesoscopic structural dynamics of enzymatic cellulose degradation. J Biol Chem 287:2759-2765.
5. Dagel DJ, Liu Y-S, Zhong L, Luo Y, Zeng Y, Himmel M, Ding S-Y, Smith S. 2011. DOPI and PALM imaging of single carbohydrate binding modules bound to cellulose nanocrystals. In Enderlein J, Gryczynski ZK, Erdmann R, editors. Single molecule spectroscopy and imaging IV, Proc SPIE 7905: doi: 10.1117/12.875285
6. Ding S-Y, Himmel M, Xie SX. 2008. Identify molecular structural features of biomass recalcitrance using non-destructive microscopy and spectroscopy. Microsc Microanal 14:1494-1495.
7. Donaldson LA. 1988. Ultrastructure of wood cellulose substrates during enzymatic hydrolysis. Wood Sci Technol 22:33-41.
8. Donaldson LA. 2001. Lignification and lignin topochemistry-An ultrastructural view. Phytochemistry 57:859-873.
9. Donaldson LA, Wong KKY, Mackie KL. 1988. Ultrastructure of steam exploded wood. Wood Sci Technol 22:103-114.
10. Donaldson LA, Radotić K, Kalauzi A, Djikanović D, Jeremić M. 2010. Quantification of compression wood severity in tracheids of Pinus radiata D. Don using confocal fluorescence imaging and spectral deconvolution. J Struct Biol 169:106-115.
11. Eriksson T, Börjesson J, Tjerneld F. 2002. Mechanism of surfactant effect in enzymatic hydrolysis of lignocellulose. Enzyme Microb Technol 31:353-354.
12. Gierlinger N, Goswami L, Schmidt M, Burgert I, Coutand C, Rogge T, Schwanninger M. 2008. In situ FT-IR microscopic study on enzymatic treatment of poplar wood cross-sections. Biomacromolecules 9:2194-2201.
13. Igarashi K, Uchihashi T, Koivula A, Wada M, Kimura S, Okamoto T, Penttila M, Ando T, Samejima M. 2011. Traffic jams reduce hydrolytic efficiency of cellulose on cellulose surface. Science 333:1279-1282.
14. IUPAC (International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry). 1987. Measurement of cellulase activity. Pure Appl Chem 59:257-268.
15. Jung J, Gaiotto T, Han JJ, Close DW, Bradbury ARM, Jeoh T, Gnanakaran GS, Goodwin PM. 2013. Binding and movement of individual Cel7A cellobiohydrolases on crystalline cellulose surfaces revealed by single-molecule fluorescence imaging. J Biol Chem 288:24164-24172.
16. Kristensen JB, Börjesson J, Bruun MH, Tjerneld F, Jørgensen H. 2007. Use of surface active additives in enzymatic hydrolysis of wheat straw lignocellulose. Enzyme Microb Technol 40:888-895.
17. Kumar P, Barrett DM, Delwiche MJ, Stroeve P. 2009. Methods for pre-treatment of lignocellulosic biomass for efficient hydrolysis and biofuel production. Ind Eng Chem Res 48(8):3713-3729.
18. Luterbacher JS, Walker LP, Moran-Mirabal JM. 2013. Observing and modelling BMCC degradation by commercial cellulase cocktails with fluorescently labelled Trichoderma reseii Cel7A through confocal microscopy. Biotechnol Bioeng 110:108-117.
19. Moran-Mirabal JM, Santhanam N, Corgie SC, Craighead HG, Walker LP. 2008. Immobilisation of cellulose fibrils on solid substrates for cellulase-binding studies through quantitative fluorescence microscopy. Biotechnol Bioeng 101:1129-1141.
20. Ouyang J, Dong Z, Song X, Lee X, Chen M, Yong Q. 2010. Improved enzymatic hydrolysis of microcrystalline cellulose (Avicel PH101) by polyethylene glycol addition. Bioresour Technol 101:6685-6691.
21. Periasamy A, Day RN. 2005. Molecular imaging-FRET microscopy and spectroscopy. New York: Oxford University Press. 312 pp.
22. Pettersen RC, Schwandt VH. 1991. Wood sugar analysis by anion chromatography. J Wood Chem Technol 11:495-501.
23. Putoczki TL, Gerrard JA, Butterfield BG, Jackson SL. 2008. The distribution of un-esterified and methyl-esterified pectic polysaccharides in Pinus radiata. IAWA J 29:115-127.
24. Ragauskas A, Huang F. 2013. Chemical pre-treatment techniques for biofuels and biorefineries from softwood. In: Fang Z, editor. Green energy and technology, pre-treatment techniques for biofuels and biorefineries. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Verlag. p 151-179.
25. Rahikainen J, Mikander S, Marjamaa K, Tamminen T, Lappas A, Viikari L, Kruus K. 2011. Inhibition of enzymatic hydrolysis by residual lignins from softwood-Study of enzyme binding and inactivation on lignin-rich surface. Biotechnol Bioeng 108:2823-2834.
26. Ryan L, Convery F, Ferreira S. 2006. Stimulating the use of biofuels in the European Union: Implications for climate change policy. Energy Policy 34:3184-3194.
27. Sewalt VJH, Glasser WG, Beauchemin KA. 1997. Lignin impact on fibre degradation. 3. Reversal of inhibition of enzymatic hydrolysis by chemical modification of lignin and by additives. J Agric Food Chem 45:1823-1828.
28. Sipos B, Dienes D, Schleicher Á, Perazzini R, Crestini C, Siika-Aho M, Réczey K. 2010. Hydrolysis efficiency and enzyme adsorption on steam-pretreated spruce in the presence of poly(ethylene glycol). Enzyme Microb Technol 47:84-90.
29. Stryer L, Haugland RP. 1967. Energy transfer: A spectroscopic ruler. Proc Natl Acad Sci 58:719-726.
30. Thygesen LG, Hidayat BJ, Johansen KS, Felby C. 2011. Role of supramolecular cellulose structures in enzymatic hydrolysis of plant cell walls. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 38:975-983.
31. Uprichard JM. 1965. The alpha-cellulose content of wood by the chlorite procedure. Appita 19:36-39.
32. Wong KKY, Deverall KF, Mackie KL, Clark TA, Donaldson LA. 1988. The relationship between fibre porosity and cellulose digestibility in steam-exploded Pinus radiata. Biotechnol Bioeng 31:447-456.
33. Xu Y, Xin W, He D, Jiang Q, Song Z, Song Q. 2013. A biomass energy route for refineries from a low-carbon perspective. Adv Mat Res 616-618:1137-1142.
34. Zhang Y, Zhang Y, Tang L. 2011. Effect of PEG4000 on cellulase catalysis in the lignocellulose saccharification processes. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 86:115-120.
35. Zhu P, Moran-Mirabal J-M, Luterbacher JS, Walker LP, Craighead HG. 2011. Observing Thermobifida fusca cellulase binding to pre-treated wood particles using time-lapse confocal laser scanning microscopy. Cellulose 18:749-758.