Design of brownfield landscapes under different contaminant remediation policies in Europe and the United States

Landscape Journal

Volumn 32, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 277-292

  Erdem, Meltem ^a   Nassauer, Joan Iverson ^b  

^a ISTANBUL TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

Ecological risk assessment; Groundwater; Landscape architecture; Urban design; Wildlife

Indexed keywords

EID: 84894253511     PISSN: 02772426     EISSN: 15532704     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3368/lj.32.2.277     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Annen, Günther. 1990. The Emscher River-A model of integrated water management in an urbanized area: problems and challenges. In Hydrological Processes and Water Management in Urban Areas, Proceedings of the Duisberg Symposium, 198: 347-352. IAHS Press, Institute of Hydrology, Wallingford, Oxfordshire, UK.
2. Borak, David, and Danielle Miller Wagner. 2005. Land Use Control Implementation Plan Model Framework. International City/ County Management Association.
3. Brandt, Jesper, Henrik Vejre, Ülo Mander, and Marc Antrop. 2004. Multifunctional Landscapes: Theory, Values, And History. Ashurst, Southampton, UK: WIT Press.
4. Brownfield Integrated Urban Policies (BRINGUP). 2010. Brownfield Integrated Governance, Baseline Study- Development Phase. Brussels, Belgium: European Programme for Sustainable Urban Development.
5. Brown, Brenda J. 2001. Reconstructing the Ruhrgebeit. Landscape Architecture 91: 66-95.
6. Concentrated Action On Brownfield and Economic Regeneration Network (CABERNET). 2006. Sustainable Brownfield Regeneration, Network Report. Nottingham, UK: CABERNET Coordination Team, University of Nothingham.
7. Carman, Eric. 2001. From laboratory to landscape: a case history and possible future direction for phyto-enhanced soil bioremediation. In Manufactured Sites: Rethinking the Post-Industrial Landscape, ed. Niall Kirkwood, 43-49. New York: Taylor and Francis.
8. Christine, Stella, and Richard Teeuw. 1998. Varied policy of European Union states on contaminated land. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 18(2): 175-197.
9. Christine, Stella, and Richard Teeuw. 2000. Policy and administration of contaminated land within the European Union. European Environment 10(1): 24-34.
10. Dames and Moore. 1997. Final Remedial Investigation Report, Presidio Main Installation, Presidio of San Francisco. Denver, CO: Dames and Moore.
11. Dettmar, Jörg. 2005. Nature-dominated development in urban landscapes. In Landscape Architecture in Mutation: Essays on Urban Landscape, eds. Adam Hubertus, Institute for Landscape Architecture, 79-98. Zurich: ETH Zurich.
12. Erler and Kalinowski. 2004. Crissy Field Operable Unit 4 Implementation Report, http://www.Archieve.org/strean/CrissyFieldOperableUnit4implementationReportPresidioOfSanFrancisco/CrissyFieldOperableUnit4ImplementationReportclosureReport#page/n13/mode/1up [October 10, 2010].
13. Ferber, Uwe, Detlef Grimski, Kate Millar, and Paul Nathanail. 2006. Sustainable Brownfield Regeneration: CABERNET Network Report. Nottingham, UK: CABERNET Coordination Team, University of Nothingham.
14. Ferguson, Colin C. 1999. Assessing risk from contaminated sites: Policy and practice in 16 European countries. Land Contamination and Reclamation 7(2): 33-54
15. Golden Gate National Park Conservancy. 2010. http://www.parksconservancy.org/visit/park-sites/crissy-field.html [September 10, 2010].
16. Grimski, Detlef, and Uwe Ferber. 2001. Urban brownfields in Europe. Land Contamination and Reclamation 9(1):143-148.
17. Grimski, Detlef, and Uwe Ferber. 2002. Brownfield and redevelopment of urban areas: A Report From Contaminated Land Rehabilitation Network for Environmental Technologies. Vienna, Austria: Umweltbundesamt GmbH.
18. Guglielmi, Andrew O. 2005. Recreating the western city in a post-industrialized world: European brownfield policy and an American comparison. Buffalo Law Review 25(4): 1273-1312.
19. Hamm, Astrid. 2006. A Landscape Laboratory in Germany-reaching out for new landscape concepts. Master diss., Alnarp, Sweden: Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences.
20. Kingsbury, Garrie L., and R.M. Ray. 1996. Reclamation and edevelopment of Contaminated Land: Volume 1. U.S. Case Studies. The USEPA /600/2-86/066.
21. Kirkwood, Niall. 2001. Manufactured sites: Integrating technology and design in reclaimed landscapes. In Manufactured Sites: Rethinking the Post-Industrial Landscape, ed. Niall Kirkwood, 3-11. New York: Taylor and Francis.
22. Khan, Faisal I., Tahir Husain, and Ramzi Hejazi. 2004. An overview and analysis of site remediation technologies. Journal of Environmental Management 71(2):95-122.
23. Krinke, Rebecca. 2001. Overview: Design practice and manufactured sites. In Manufactured Sites: Rethinking the Post-Industrial Landscape, ed. Niall Kirkwood, 125-149. New York: Taylor and Francis.
24. Langhorst, Joern. 2004. Rising from ruins: Postindustrial sites between abandonment and engagement. Proceedings of the OpenSpace: PeopleSpace Conference. October 27-29, Edinburgh, Scotland.
25. Latz, Peter. 2001. Landscape Park Duisburg-Nord: The metamorphosis of an industrial site. In Manufactured Sites: Rethinking the Post-Industrial Landscape, ed. Niall Kirkwood, 150-161. New York: Taylor and Francis.
26. Lyall, Sutherland. 1991. Richard Haag Associates, Gas Works Park, Seattle, Washington. In Designing the New Landscape, 204-207. Thames and Hudson.
27. McGeehan, Patrick. 2011. The High Line isn't just a sight to see: I t's also an economic dynamo. The New York Times, June 5.
28. Meyer, Peter B., and H. Wade VanLandingham. 2000. Reclamation and Economic Regeneration of Brownfields: Reviews of Economic Development Literature and Practice 1. Louisville, KY: The E.P. System Group.
29. Nassauer, Joan. 1992. The appearance of ecological systems as a matter of policy. Landscape Ecology 6(4): 239-250.
30. Provoost, Jeroen, Christa Cornelis, and Frank Swartjes. 2006. Comparison of soil clean-up standards for trace elements between countries: Why do they differ? Journal of Soil Sediments 6(3): 173-181.
31. Rieder, Kirt. 2001. Crissy Field: Tidal marsh restoration and form. In Manufactured Sites: Rethinking the Post-Industrial Landscape, ed. Niall Kirkwood, 193-205. New York: Taylor and Francis.
32. Rock, Steven. 2001. Phytoremediation: integrating art and engineering through planting. In Manufactured Sites: Rethinking the Post-Industrial Landscape, ed. Niall Kirkwood, 52-58. New York: Taylor and Francis.
33. Rodrigues, Sonia Morais, Maria Eduarda Pereira, Eduardo Anselba Ferreira da Silva, Andrew Hursthouse, and Armando da Costa. 2009. A review of regulatory decisions for environmental protection: Part 1-Challenges in the implementation of national soil policies. Environment International 35(1): 202-213.
34. Russ, Thomas. 2000. Redeveloping Brownfields: Landscape Architects, Planners, Developers. New York: McGraw Hill.
35. Sarni, William. 2010. Greening Brownfields: Remediation Through Sustainable Development. New York: McGraw Hill.
36. Selman, Paul. 2009. Planning for landscape multifunctionality. Sust ainability: Science, Practice, and Policy 5(2): 45-52.
37. Shaw, Robert. 2002. The International Building Exhibition (IBA) Emscher Park, Germany: A model for sustainable restructuring? European Planning Studies 10(1): 77-97.
38. Swartjes, Frank A., Claudio Carlon, and Niek H.S.M. de Wit. 2008. The possibilities for the EU-wide use of similar ecological risk-based soil contamination assessment tools. Science of the Total Environment 406(3): 523-529.
39. Thornton, Gareth, Martin Franz, David Edwards, Gemot Pahlen, and Paul Nathanail. 2007. The challenge of sustainability: Incentives for brownfield regeneration in Europe. Environmental Science and Policy 10(2): 116-134.
40. Tucker, Robert. K. and Judith Auer Shaw. 2000. Phytoremediation and public acceptance. In Phytoremediation of Toxic Metals: Using Plants to Clean up the Environment, eds. Ilya Raskin and Burt. D. Ensley, 33-42. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
41. United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 2009. Ecological Revitalization, Turning Contaminated Properties into Community Assests, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, EPA 542-R-08.
42. United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 2 0 12 a. Brown fields and Land Revitalization. http://www.epa.gov/brownfields/ [September 4, 2012].
43. United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 2012b. Gowanus Canal New York EPA ID#: NYN000206222. http://www.epa.gov/region02 /superfund/npl/0206222c.pdf [August 30, 2012].
44. United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 2013. Ecological Risk Assessment Glossary of Terms.http://www.epa.gov/reg5sfun/ecology/glossary.html [March 20, 2013].
45. Ward, Kristen and Myla Ablog. 2006. Crissy Field Restoration Project Summary of Monitoring Data 2000-2004. San Francisco: National Park Service, Golden Gate National Recreation Area.
46. Washington State Department of Ecology (DOE). 2005. First Five-Year Review Report Gas Works Park Site. Bellevue, Washington: Washington State Department of Ecology, Northwest Regional Office
47. Weilacher, Udo. 2007. Duisburg-Nord Landscape Park. In Syntax of Landscape, The Landscape Architecture of Peter Latz and Partner, ed. Udo Weilacher,102-132. Basel, Switzerland: Birkhauser.