Modified ultrafiltration membranes for humic acid removal

Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers

Volumn 45, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 275-282

  Mehrparvar, Alisa ^a   Rahimpour, Ahmad ^a   Jahanshahi, Mohsen ^a  

^a BABOL NOSHIRVANI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Iran)

Author keywords

Diaminobenzoic acid; Fouling; Gallic acid; Humic acid removal; Hydrophilic; Polymeric membranes

Indexed keywords

EID: 84894246401     PISSN: 18761070     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtice.2013.06.003     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Weatherley L.R. Engineering processes for bio-separation 1994, Butterworth-Heinemann, Northern Ireland.
2. Bae T.H., Han S.S., Tak T.M. Membrane sequencing batch reactor system for the treatment of dairy industry wastewater. Process Biochem 2003, 39:221-231.
3. Magara Y., Kunikane S., Itoh M. Advanced membrane technology for application to water treatment. Water Sci Technol 1998, 37:91-99.
4. Bolzonella D., Fatone F., di Fabio S., Cecchi F. Application of membrane bioreactor technology for wastewater treatment and reuse in the Mediterranean region: focusing on removal efficiency of non-conventional pollutants. J Environ Manage 2010, 91:2424-2431.
5. Greenlee L.F., Lawler D.F., Freeman B.D., Marrot B., Moulin P. Reverse osmosis desalination: water sources, technology, and today's challenges. Water Res 2009, 43:2317-2348.
6. Shao L., Low B.T., Chung T.S., Greenberg A.R. Polymeric membranes for the hydrogen economy: contemporary approaches and prospects for the future. J Membr Sci 2009, 327:18-31.
7. Vankelecom I.F.J., De Smet K., Gevers L.E.M., Jacobs P.A. Nanofiltration: principles and applications 2003, Elsevier, Oxford, UK.
8. Van der Bruggen B., Braeken L., Vandecasteele C. Flux decline in nanofiltration due to adsorption of organic compounds. Sep Purif Technol 2002, 29:23-31.
9. Braeken L., Boussu K., Van der Bruggen B., Vandecasteele C. Modeling of the adsorption of organic compounds on polymeric nanofiltration membranes in solutions containing two compounds. Chem Phys Chem 2005, 6:1606-1612.
10. Mulder M.H.V. Chapter 2. Polarization phenomena and membrane fouling. Membrane Separations Technology-Principles and Applications 1995, 2:45-84.
11. Rana D., Matsuura T. Surface modifications for antifouling membranes. Chem Rev 2010, 110:2448-2471.
12. Van der Bruggen B. Chemical modification of polyethersulfone nanofiltration membranes: a review. J Appl Polym Sci 2009, 114:630-642.
13. Nagendran A., Mohan D.R. Cellulose acetate and polyetherimide blend ultrafiltration membranes: II. Effect of additive. Polym Adv Technol 2008, 19:24-35.
14. Sivakumar M., Mohan D.R., Rangarajan R. Studies on cellulose acetate-polysulfone ultrafiltration membranes: II. Effect of additive concentration. J Membr Sci 2006, 268:208-219.
15. Fu X., Maruyama T., Sotani T., Matsuyama H. Effect of surface morphology on membrane fouling by humic acid with the use of cellulose acetate butyrate hollow fiber membranes. J Membr Sci 2008, 320:483-491.
16. Shi Q., Su Y., Zhu S., Li C., Zhao Y., Jiang Z. A facile method for synthesis of pegylated polyethersulfone and its application in fabrication of antifouling ultrafiltration membrane. J Membr Sci 2007, 303:204-212.
17. Wang Y.Q., Su Y.L., Sun Q., Ma X.L., Jiang Z.Y. Generation of anti-biofouling ultrafiltration membrane surface by blending novel branched amphiphilic polymers with polyethersulfone. J Membr Sci 2006, 286:228-236.
18. Rahimpour A., Madaeni S.S., Jahanshahi M., Mansourpanah Y., Mortazavian N. Development of high performance nano-porous polyethersulfone ultrafiltration membranes with hydrophilic surface and superior antifouling properties. Appl Surf Sci 2009, 255:9166-9173.
19. Pieracci J., Crivello J.V., Belfort G. Photochemical modification of 10kDa polyethersulfone. Ultrafiltration membranes for reduction of biofouling. J Membr Sci 1999, 156:223-240.
20. Shim J.K., Na H.S., Lee Y.M., Huh H., Nho Y.C. Surface modification of polypropylene membranes by γ-ray induced graft copolymerization and their solute permeation characteristics. J Membr Sci 2001, 190:215-226.
21. Kim J.H., Kim C.K. Ultrafiltration membranes prepared from blends of polyethersulfone and poly (1-vinylpyrrolidone-co-styrene) copolymers. J Membr Sci 2005, 262:60-68.
22. Pieracci J., Wood D.W., Crivello J.V., Belfort G. UV-assisted graft polymerization of N-vinyl-2-pyrrolidinone onto poly (ether sulfone) ultrafiltration membranes: comparison of dip versus immersion modification techniques. Chem Mater 2000, 12:2123-2133.
23. Nady N., Franssen M.C.R., Zuilhof H., Mohy Eldin M.S., Boom R., Schroën K. Modification methods for poly(arylsulfone) membranes: a mini-review focusing on surface modification. Desalination 2011, 275:1-9.
24. Xu Z.L., Chung T.S., Huang Y. Effect of polyvinyl pyrrolidone molecular weights on morphology, oil/water separation, mechanical and thermal properties of polyetherimide/polyvinyl pyrrolidone hollow fiber membranes. J Appl Polym Sci 1999, 74:2220-2233.
25. Marchese J., Ponce M., Ochoa N.A., Prádanos P., Palacio L., Hernández A. Fouling behaviour of polyethersulfone UF membranes made with different PVP. J Membr Sci 2003, 211:1-11.
26. Rahimpour A., Madaeni S.S., Shockravi A., Ghorbani S. Preparation and characterization of hydrophile nano-porous polyethersulfone membranes using synthesized poly(sulfoxide-amide) as additive in the casting solution. J Membr Sci 2009, 334:64-73.
27. Xu Z.L., Sichuan T., Loha K.C., Lima B.C. Polymeric asymmetric membranes made from polyetherimide/polybenzimidazole/poly(ethyleneglycol) (PEI/PBI/PEG) for oil-surfactant-water separation. J Membr Sci 1999, 158:41-53.
28. Rahimpour A., Gorbani S., Madaeni S.S., Shockravi A., Mansourpanah Y. The influence of sulfonated polyethersulfone (SPES) on surface nano-morphology and performance of polyethersulfone (PES) membrane. Appl Surf Sci 2010, 256:1825-1831.
29. Chakraberty B., Ghoshal A.K., Purkait M.K. Effect molecular weight of PEG on membrane morphology and transport properties. J Membr Sci 2008, 309:209-221.
30. Singh A., Narvi S., Dutta P., Pandey N. External stimuli response on a novel chitosan hydrogel crosslinked with formaldehyde. Bull Mat Sci 2006, 29:233-238.
31. 2 entrapped nanocomposite PVDF/SPES membranes: preparation, characterization, antifouling and antibacterial properties. Desalination 2011, 278:343-353.
32. Elimelech M., Zhu X., Childress A.E., Hong S. Role of membrane surface morphology in colloidal fouling of cellulose acetate and composite aromatic polyamide reverse osmosis membranes. J Membr Sci 1997, 127:101-109.
33. Vrijenhoek E.M., Hong S., Elimelech M. Influence of membrane surface properties on initial rate of colloidal fouling of reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes. J Membr Sci 2001, 188:115-128.