Canadian Society of Nephrology 2014 clinical practice guideline for timing the initiation of chronic dialysis

CMAJ. Canadian Medical Association Journal

Volumn 186, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 112-117

  Nesrallah, Gihad E ^a,c,d   Mustafa, Reem A ^d,e   Clark, William F ^b,c   Bass, Adam ^f   Barnieh, Lianne ^f   Hemmelgarn, Brenda R ^f   Klarenbach, Scott ^g   Quinn, Robert R ^h   Hiremath, Swapnil ^i,j   Ravani, Pietro ^h   Sood, Manish M ^j   Moist, Louise M ^b,c  

^a ST MICHAEL'S HOSPITAL   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

^c LONDON HEALTH SCIENCES CENTRE   (Canada)

^d MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^e UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI KANSAS CITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

^g UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

^h UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

ⁱ UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

^j OTTAWA HOSPITAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Canada)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CHRONIC KIDNEY DISEASE; CREATININE CLEARANCE; GLOMERULUS FILTRATION RATE; HEALTH CARE COST; HIGH RISK PATIENT; HOSPITAL ADMISSION; HUMAN; KIDNEY FUNCTION; MEDICAL SOCIETY; NUTRITIONAL STATUS; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; QUALITY OF LIFE; RENAL REPLACEMENT THERAPY; RISK REDUCTION; SURVIVAL; TIME TO TREATMENT; TREATMENT DURATION;

HUMANS; RENAL DIALYSIS; RENAL INSUFFICIENCY, CHRONIC; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 84894194354     PISSN: 08203946     EISSN: 14882329     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.130363     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. White CA, Akbari A. The estimation, measurement, and relevance of the glomerular filtration rate in stage 5 chronic kidney disease. Semin Dial 2011;24: 540-9.
2. Grootendorst DC, Michels WM, Richardson JD, et al. The MDRD formula does not reflect GFR in ESRD patients. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2011;26: 1932-7.
3. Almond A, Siddiqui S, Robertson S, et al. Comparison of combined urea and creatinine clearance and prediction equations as measures of residual renal function when GFR is low. QJM 2008; 101: 619-24.
4. Gama-Axelsson T, Heimburger O, Stenvinkel P, et al. Serum albumin as predictor of nutritional status in patients with ESRD. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2012;7: 1446-53.
5. Rosansky SJ, Clark WF, Eggers P, et al. Initiation of dialysis at higher GFRs: Is the apparent rising tide of early dialysis harmful or helpful? Kidney Int 2009;76: 257-61.
6. Cooper BA, Branley P, Bulfone L, et al. A randomized, controlled trial of early versus late initiation of dialysis. N Engl J Med 2010; 363: 609-19.
7. Churchill DN, Blake PG, Jindal KK, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for initiation of dialysis. J Am Soc Nephrol 1999; (Suppl 13): 289-91.
8. Levin A, Hemmelgarn B, Culleton B, et al. Guidelines for the management of chronic kidney disease. CMAJ 2008;179: 1154-62.
9. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, et al. GRADE guidelines: 2. Framing the question and deciding on important outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol 2011;64: 395-400.
10. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, et al. GRADE guidelines: 6. Rating the quality of evidence - imprecision. J Clin Epidemiol 2011;64: 1283-93.
11. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist G, et al. GRADE guidelines: 4. Rating the quality of evidence - study limitations (risk of bias). J Clin Epidemiol 2011;64: 407-15.
12. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Montori V, et al. GRADE guidelines: 5. Rating the quality of evidence - publication bias. J Clin Epidemiol 2011;64: 1277-82.
13. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, et al. GRADE guidelines: 7. Rating the quality of evidence - inconsistency. J Clin Epidemiol 2011;64: 1294-302.
14. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, et al. GRADE guidelines: 8. Rating the quality of evidence - indirectness. J Clin Epidemiol 2011;64: 1303-10.
15. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Sultan S, et al. GRADE guidelines: 9. Rating up the quality of evidence. J Clin Epidemiol 2011; 64: 1311-6.
16. Guyatt G, Oxman AD, Sultan S, et al. GRADE guidelines: 11. Making an overall rating of confidence in effect estimates for a single outcome and for all outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol 2013; 6: 151-7.
17. Harris A, Cooper B, Li J, et al. Cost-effectiveness of initiating dialysis early: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Kidney Dis 2011; 57: 707-15.
18. Lee H, Manns B, Taub K, et al. Cost analysis of ongoing care of patients with end-stage renal disease: the impact of dialysis modality and dialysis access. Am J Kidney Dis 2002;40: 611-22.
19. Susantitaphong P, Altamimi S, Ashkar M, et al. GFR at initiation of dialysis and mortality in CKD: a meta-analysis. Am J Kidney Dis 2012;59: 829-40.
20. Collins J, Cooper B, Branley P, et al. Outcomes of patients with planned initiation of hemodialysis in the IDEAL trial. Contrib Nephrol 2011;171: 1-9.
21. Johnson DW, Wong MG, Cooper BA, et al. Effect of timing of dialysis commencement on clinical outcomes of patients with planned initiation of peritoneal dialysis in the IDEAL trial. Perit Dial Int 2012;32: 595-604.
22. Whalley GA, Marwick TH, Doughty RN, et al. Effect of early initiation of dialysis on cardiac structure and function: results from the echo substudy of the IDEAL trial. Am J Kidney Dis 2013;61: 262-70.
23. Tattersall J, Dekker F, Heimburger O, et al. When to start dialysis: updated guidance following publication of the Initiating Dialysis Early and Late (IDEAL) study. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2011;26: 2082-6.
24. Kelly J, Stanley M, Harris D; Caring for Australians with Renal Impairment (CARI). The CARI guidelines. Acceptance into dialysis guidelines. Nephrology (Carlton) 2005;10(Suppl 4): S46-60.
25. Peritoneal Dialysis Adequacy Work Group. Clinical practice guidelines for peritoneal dialysis adequacy. Am J Kidney Dis 2006; 48(Suppl 1):S98-129.
26. Steiber AL, Kalantar-Zadeh K, Secker D, et al. Subjective Global Assessment in chronic kidney disease: a review. J Ren Nutr 2004; 14: 191-200.