N400 effect when a semantic anomaly is detected in action representation. a source localization analysis

Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology

Volumn 31, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 58-64

  Balconi, Michela ^a   Vitaloni, Silvia ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÀ CATTOLICA DEL SACRO CUORE   (Italy)

Author keywords

Action representation; Cortical source analysis; LORETA; N400

Indexed keywords

ADULT; BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; SEMANTICS; VISUAL PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84894163220     PISSN: 07360258     EISSN: 15371603     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/WNP.0000000000000017     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Bach P, Gunter TC, Knoblich G, et al. N400-like negativities in action perception reflect the activation of two components of an action representation. Soc Neurosci 2009;4:212-232.
2. Balconi M, Caldiroli C. Semantic violation effect on object-related action comprehension. N400-like ERP for unusual and incorrect use. Neuroscience 2011;197:191-199.
3. Balconi M, Crivelli D. FRN and P300 ERP effect modulation in response to feedback sensitivity: the contribution of punishment-reward system (BIS/BAS) and behaviour identification of action. Neurosci Res 2010;66:162-172.
4. Balconi M, Pozzoli U. Comprehending semantic and grammatical violations in Italian. N400 and P600 comparison with visual and auditory stimuli. J Psycholinguist Res 2005;34:71-98.
5. Balconi M, Vitaloni S. The tDCS effect on alpha brain oscillation for correct vs. incorrect object use. The contribution of the left DLPFC. Neurosci Lett 2012;517:25-29.
6. Balconi M, Brambilla E, Falbo L. BIS/BAS, cortical oscillations and coherence in response to emotional cues. Brain Res Bull 2009;80:151-157.
7. Bentin S, McCarthy G, Wood CC. Event-related potentials, lexical decision and semantic priming. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1985;60:343-355.
8. Federmeier KD, Kutas M. Meaning and modality: influences of context, semantic memory organization, and perceptual predictability on picture processing. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 2001;27:202-224.
9. Friederici AD, Ruschemeyer SA, Hahne A, Fiebach CJ. The role of left inferior frontal and superior temporal cortex in sentence comprehension: localizing syntactic and semantic processes. Cereb Cortex 2003;13:170-177.
10. Gallese V. Mirror neurons and the social nature of language: the neural exploitation hypothesis. Soc Neurosci 2008;3:317-333.
11. Ganis G, Kutas M. An electrophysiological study of scene effects on object identification. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res 2003;16:123-144.
12. Ganis G, Kutas M, Sereno MI. The search for common sense: an electrophysio-logical study of the comprehension of words and pictures in reading. J Cogn Neurosci 1996;8:89-106.
13. Hagoort P, Hald L, Bastiaansen M, Petersson KM. Integration of word meaning and world knowledge in language comprehension. Science 2004;304:438-441.
14. Jasper HH. The ten-twenty electrode system of International Federation EEG. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1958;10:371-375.
15. Kemmerer D, Castillo JG, Talavage T, et al. Neuroanatomical distribution of five semantic components of verbs: evidence from fMRI. Brain Lang 2008;107: 16-43.
16. Kuperberg GR, Sitnikova T, Lakshmanan BM. Neuroanatomical distinctions within the semantic system during sentence comprehension: evidence from functional magnetic resonance imaging. Neuroimage 2008;40:367-388.
17. Kutas M, Hillyard SA. Reading senseless sentences: brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. Science 1980;207:203-205.
18. Kutas M, Hillyard SA. Brain potentials during reading reflect word expectancy and semantic association. Nature 1984;307:161-163.
19. Ludwig KA, Mirinai MR, Langhals NB, et al. Using a common average reference to improve cortical neuron recordings from microelectrode arrays. J Neuro-physiol 2008;101:1679-1689.
20. McPherson W, Holcomb P. An electrophysiological investigation of semantic priming with pictures of real objects. Psychophysiology 1999;36:53-65.
21. Murray LJ, Ranganath C. The dorsolateral prefrontal cortex contributes to successful relational memory encoding. J Neurosci 2007;27:5515-5522.
22. Pascual-Marqui RD, Michel CM, Lehmann D. Low resolution electromagnetic tomography: a new method for localizing electrical activity in the brain. Int J Psychophysiol 1994;18:49-65.
23. Peeters R, Simone L, Nelissen K, et al. The representation of tool use in humans and monkeys: common and uniquely human features. J Neurosci 2009;29:11523-11539.
24. Proverbio MA, Riva F, Zani A. When neurons do not mirror the agent's intentions: sex differences in neural coding of goal-directed actions. Neuropsychologia 2010;48:1454-1463.
25. Reid VM, Striano T. N400 involvement in the processing of action sequences. BMC Neurosci 2008;30:56.
26. Rizzolatti G, Craighero L. The Mirror-neuron system. Annu Rev Neurosci 2004;27:169-192.
27. Shibata H, Gyoba J, Suzuki Y. Event-related potentials during the evaluation of the appropriateness of cooperative actions. Neurosci Lett 2009;452:189-193.
28. Sitnikova T, Holcomb PJ, Kiyonaga KA, Kuperberg GR. Two neurocognitive mechanisms of semantic integration during the comprehension of visual real-world events. J Cogn Neurosci 2008;20:2037-2057.
29. Stoeckel C, Gough PM, Watkins KE, Devlin JT. Supramarginal gyrus involvement in visual word recognition. Cortex 2009;45:1091-1096.
30. Van Berkum JJ, Hagoort P, Brown CM. Semantic integration in sentences and discourse: evidence from the N400. J Cogn Neurosci 1999;11:657-671.
31. Van Elk M, van Schie HAT, Bekkering H. N400-concreteness effect reflects the retrieval of semantic information during the preparation of meaningful actions. Biol Psychol 2010;85:134-142.
32. West WC, Holcomb PJ. Event-related potentials during discourse level semantic integration of complex pictures. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res 2002;13:363.