Factors in contact lens symptoms: Evidence from a multistudy database

Optometry and Vision Science

Volumn 91, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 133-141

  Truong, Tan N ^a   Graham, Andrew D ^a   Lin, Meng C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Comfort; Conjunctiva; Cornea; Ethnicity; Lens performance; Lens induced dryness; Race; Silicone hydrogel contact lenses

Indexed keywords

SILICONE DERIVATIVE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; DRY EYE; FACTUAL DATABASE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HYDROGEL; HYDROPHILIC CONTACT LENS; MALE; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PHYSIOLOGY; PROSTHESIS; TIME; VISION; VISUAL DISORDER; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CONTACT LENSES, HYDROPHILIC; DATABASES, FACTUAL; DRY EYE SYNDROMES; FEMALE; HUMANS; HYDROGEL; MALE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PROSTHESIS FITTING; SILICONES; TIME FACTORS; VISION DISORDERS; VISION, OCULAR; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84894088594     PISSN: 10405488     EISSN: 15389235     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000000138     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Bruce AS, Little SA. Soft lens design, fitting and physiologic response. In:HomMM, Bruce AS, eds.Manual ofContact Lens Prescribing and Fitting. 3rd ed. Boston,MA: ButterworthHeinemann; 2006: 277-312.
2. Terry RL, Schnider CM, Holden BA, Cornish R, Grant T, Sweeney D, La Hood D, Back A. CCLRU standards for success of daily and extended wear contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci 1993;70: 234-43.
3. Young G. Evaluation of soft contact lens fitting characteristics.Optom Vis Sci 1996;73: 247-54.
4. Nichols JJ, Sinnott LT. Tear film, contact lens, and patient factors associatedwithcornealstaining. InvestOphthalmolVisSci2011;52: 1127-37.
5. GlassonMJ, Stapleton F,Keay L,WillcoxMD.The effect of short term contact lens wear on the tear film and ocular surface characteristics of tolerant and intolerantwearers. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2006;29: 41-7.
6. Dumbleton KA, Chalmers RL, McNally J, Bayer S, Fonn D. Effect of lens base curve on subjective comfort and assessment of fit with silicone hydrogel continuous wear contact lenses.OptomVis Sci 2002;79: 633-7.
7. Santodomingo-Rubido J, Rubido-Crespo MJ. The clinical investigation of the base curve and comfort rate of a new prototype silicone hydrogel contact lens. Eye Contact Lens 2008;34: 146-50.
8. Dumbleton K, Keir N,Moezzi A, Feng Y, Jones L, Fonn D.Objective and subjective responses in patients refitted to daily-wear silicone hydrogel contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci 2006;83: 758-68.
9. Maldonado-Codina C, Efron N. Impact of manufacturing technology and material composition on the clinical performance of hydrogel lenses. Optom Vis Sci 2004;81: 442-54.
10. Chalmers RL, Begley CG. Dryness symptoms among an unselected clinical population with and without contact lens wear. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2006;29: 25-30.
11. Hamano H, Jacob JT, Senft CJ, Hamano T, Hamano T, Mitsunaga S, Kotani S,KaufmanHE. Differences in contact lens-induced responses in the corneas of Asian and non-Asian subjects. CLAO J 2002;28: 101-4.
12. Lin MC, Yeh TN, Graham AD, Truong T, Hsiao C, Wei G, Louie A. Ocular surface health during 30-day continuous wear: rigid gaspermeable versus silicone hydrogel hyper-O2 transmitted contact lenses. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2011;52: 3530-8.
13. Knop E, Korb DR, Blackie CA, Knop N. The lid margin is an underestimated structure for preservation of ocular surface health and development of dry eye disease. Dev Ophthalmol 2010;45: 108-22.
14. FoulksGN, NicholsKK.Meibomian gland dysfunction: understanding and implementing the new consensus definition and treatment regimens into your optometric practice. Rev Optom 2012. COPE Course ID 34224-AS: 1-16. Available at: http://mededicus.com/downloads/Meibomian-Gland-Dysfunction.pdf. Accessed October 11, 2013.
15. Tagliaferri A. Risk factors for contact lens induced papillary conjunctivitis associated with silicone hydrogel contact lens wear [Master's thesis]. Case Western Reserve University; 2012.
16. Moodie EE, Stephens DA. Using directed acyclic graphs to detect limitations of traditional regression in longitudinal studies. Int J Public Health 2010;55: 701-3.
17. Shrier I, Platt RW. Reducing bias through directed acyclic graphs. BMC Med Res Methodol 2008;8: 70.
18. UC Berkeley Office of Planning and Analysis. UC Berkeley Fall Enrollment Data. Available at: http://opa.berkeley.edu/statistics/enrollmentData.html. Accessed October 10, 2012.
19. Terry RL, Schnider CM, Holden BA, Cornish R, Grant T, Sweeney D, La Hood D, Back A. CCLRU standards for success of daily and extended wear contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci 1993;70: 234-43.
20. Martin DK, Boulos J, Gan J, Gavriel K, Harvey P. A unifying parameter to describe the clinical mechanics of hydrogel contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci 1989;66: 87-91.
21. Schlanger JL. A study of contact lens failures. J Am Optom Assoc 1993;64: 220-4.
22. Richdale K, Sinnott LT, Skadahl E, Nichols JJ. Frequency of and factors associated with contact lens dissatisfaction and discontinuation. Cornea 2007;26: 168-74.
23. Acosta MC, Alfaro ML, Borras F, Belmonte C, Gallar J. Influence of age, gender and iris color on mechanical and chemical sensitivity of the cornea and conjunctiva. Exp Eye Res 2006;83: 932-8.
24. Murphy PJ, Patel S, Marshall J. The effect of long-term, daily contact lens wear on corneal sensitivity. Cornea 2001;20: 264-9.
25. Swarbrick HA, Holden BA. Rigid gas-permeable lens adherence: a patient-dependent phenomenon. Optom Vis Sci 1989;66: 269-75.
26. LinMC, ChenYQ, PolseKA.The effects of ocular and lens parameters on the postlens tear thickness. Eye Contact Lens 2003;29:S33-6.
27. Korb DR, Greiner JV, Herman JP, Hebert E, Finnemore VM, Exford JM, Glonek T, Olson MC. Lid-wiper epitheliopathy and dryeye symptoms in contact lens wearers. CLAO J 2002;28: 211-6.
28. McMonnies CW. Incomplete blinking: exposure keratopathy, lid wiper epitheliopathy, dry eye, refractive surgery, and dry contact lenses. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2007;30: 37-51.
29. Guillon M, Maissa C. Contact lens wear affects tear film evaporation. Eye Contact Lens 2008;34: 326-30.
30. Thai LC, Tomlinson A, Doane MG. Effect of contact lens materials on tear physiology. Optom Vis Sci 2004;81: 194-204.
31. Faber E, Golding TR, Lowe R, Brennan NA. Effect of hydrogel lens wear on tear film stability. Optom Vis Sci 1991;68: 380-4.
32. Nichols JJ, King-Smith PE. The impact of hydrogel lens settling on the thickness of the tears and contact lens. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2004;45: 2549-54.
33. Fonn D, Situ P, Simpson T. Hydrogel lens dehydration and subjective comfort and dryness ratings in symptomatic and asymptomatic contact lens wearers. Optom Vis Sci 1999;76: 700-4.
34. Holden BA, Sweeney DF, Seger RG. Epithelial erosions caused by thin high water content lenses. Clin Exp Optom 1986;69: 103-7.
35. Orsborn GN, Zantos SG. Corneal desiccation staining with thin high water content contact lenses. CLAO J 1988;14: 81-5.
36. Little SA, Bruce AS. Role of the post-lens tear film in the mechanism of inferior arcuate staining with ultrathin hydrogel lenses. CLAO J 1995;21: 175-81.
37. Andrasko G, Ryen K. Corneal staining and comfort observed with traditional and silicone hydrogel lenses and multipurpose solution combinations. Optometry 2008;79: 444-54.
38. Garofalo RJ, Dassanayake N, Carey C, Stein J, Stone R, David R. Corneal staining and subjective symptoms with multipurpose solutions as a function of time. Eye Contact Lens 2005;31: 166-74.
39. Lebow KA, Schachet JL. Evaluation of corneal staining and patient preference with use of three multi-purpose solutions and two brands of soft contact lenses. Eye Contact Lens 2003;29: 213-20.
40. Begley CG, Barr JT, Edrington TB, Long WD, McKenney CD, Chalmers RL. Characteristics of corneal staining in hydrogel contact lens wearers. Optom Vis Sci 1996;73: 193-200.
41. Maissa C, GuillonM, Garofalo RJ. Contact lensYinduced circumlimbal staining in silicone hydrogel contact lensesworn on a dailywear basis. Eye Contact Lens 2012;38: 16-26.
42. Funkenbusch GM, Benson RC. The conformity of a soft contact lens on the eye. J Biomech Eng 1996;118: 341-8.
43. Stapleton F, Tan ME, Papas EB, Ehrmann K, Golebiowski B, Vega J, Holden BA. Corneal and conjunctival sensitivity to air stimuli. Br J Ophthalmol 2004;88: 1547-51.