Imposing options on people in poverty: The harm of a live donor organ market

Journal of Medical Ethics

Volumn 40, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 145-150

  Rippon, Simon ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALTRUISM; ART; ARTICLE; BIOETHICS; COMMERCIAL PHENOMENA; COMMODIFICATION; DECISION MAKING; DONOR; ETHICS; HUMAN; LIVING DONOR; MORALITY; PATERNALISM; PERSONAL AUTONOMY; PHILOSOPHICAL ETHICS; POVERTY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; SOCIAL JUSTICE; TRANSPLANTATION; VULNERABLE POPULATION;

BIOETHICS; COMMERCE; ETHICS; PHILOSOPHICAL ETHICS; TISSUE AND ORGAN PROCUREMENT; TISSUE DONORS;

ALTRUISM; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; COMMERCE; COMMODIFICATION; DECISION MAKING; HUMAN BODY; HUMANS; LIVING DONORS; MORALS; PATERNALISM; PERSONAL AUTONOMY; POVERTY; SOCIAL JUSTICE; TISSUE AND ORGAN PROCUREMENT; VULNERABLE POPULATIONS;

EID: 84894076856     PISSN: 03066800     EISSN: 14734257     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2011-100318     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Savulescu J. Is the sale of body parts wrong? J Med Ethics 2003;29:138-9.
2. Radcliffe Richards J, Daar A, Guttmann R, et al. The case for allowing kidney sales. Lancet 1998;351:1950-2.
3. Dworkin G. Markets and morals. In: Dworkin G, ed. Morality, Harm and the Law. Oxford: Westview, 1994:155-61.
4. Mcgrath S. Organ procurement, altruism, and autonomy. J Value Inq 2007;40:297-309.
5. Dworkin G. Is more choice better than less? Midwest Stud Philos 1982;7:47-61.
6. Radcliffe Richards J. Nephrarious goings on: kidney sales and moral arguments. J Med Philos 1996;21:375-416.
7. Hughes PM. Exploitation, autonomy, and the case for organ sales. Int J Appl Philos 1998;12:89-95.
8. Schelling TC. The Strategy of Conflict. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 1960.
9. Velleman JD. Against the right to die. J Med Philos 1992;17:665-81.
10. Titmuss RM. The Gift Relationship: From Human Blood to Social Policy. London: Allen & Unwin, 1970.
11. Frey BS, Jegen R. Motivation crowding theory. J Econ Surv 2001;15:589-611.
12. Mellström C, Johannesson M. Crowding out in blood donation: was Titmuss right? J Eur Econ Assoc 2008;6:845-63.
13. Hippen BE. In defense of a regulated market in kidneys from living vendors. J Med Philos 2005;30:593-626.
14. Goyal M, Mehta RL, Schneiderman LJ, et al. Economic and health consequences of selling a kidney in India. JAMA 2002;288:1589-93.
15. Cohen L. Where it hurts: Indian material for an ethics of organ transplantation. Daedalus 1999;128:135-65.
16. Taylor JS. Stakes and Kidneys: Why Markets in Human Body Parts are Morally Imperative. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2005.
17. Cherry MJ. Kidney for Sale by Owner: Human Organs, Transplantation, and the Market. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press, 2005.
18. Lacetera N, Macis M. Do all material incentives for pro-social activities backfire? The response to cash and non-cash incentives for blood donations. J Econ Psychol 2010;31:738-48.
19. Lacetera N, Macis M, Slonim R. Will there be blood? Incentives and displacement effects in pro-social behavior. Am Econ J Econ Policy 2012;3:186-223.