Randomized controlled trial comparing subcuticular absorbable suture with conventional interrupted suture for wound closure at elective operation of colon cancer

Surgery (United States)

Volumn 155, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 486-492

  Tanaka, Akira ^a   Sadahiro, Sotaro ^a   Suzuki, Toshiyuki ^a   Okada, Kazutake ^a   Saito, Gota ^a  

^a TOKAI UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADENOCARCINOMA; AGED; COLECTOMY; COLONIC NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; INCIDENCE; INTENTION TO TREAT ANALYSIS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT SATISFACTION; POLYDIOXANONE; RISK; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, ELECTIVE; SURGICAL WOUND INFECTION; SUTURE TECHNIQUES; SUTURES; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84894072613     PISSN: 00396060     EISSN: 15327361     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2013.10.016     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. S.W. Grant, J. Hopkins, and S.E. Wilson Operative site bacteriology as an indicator of postoperative infectious complications in elective colorectal surgery Am Surg 61 1995 856 861
2. D.G. Jagelman, T.C. Fabian, R.L. Nichols, H.H. Stone, S.E. Wilson, and S.R. Zellner Single-dose cefotetan versus multiple-dose cefoxitin as prophylaxis in colorectal surgery Am J Surg 155 1988 71 76
3. D.J. Schoetz, P.L. Roberts, J.J. Murray, J.A. Coller, and M.C. Veidenheimer Addition of parenteral cefoxitin to regimen of oral antibiotics for elective colorectal operations. A randomized prospective study Ann Surg 212 1990 209 212
4. H.H. Stone, C.A. Hooper, L.D. Kolb, C.E. Geheber, and E.J. Dawkins Antibiotic prophylaxis in gastric, biliary and colonic surgery Ann Surg 184 1976 443 452
5. A.B. Kaiser, J.L. Herrington, J.K. Jacobs, J.L. Mulherin, A.C. Roach, and J.L. Sawyers Cefoxitin versus erythromycin, neomycin, and cefazolin in colorectal operations. Importance of the duration of the surgical procedure Ann Surg 198 1983 525 530
6. T. Suzuki, S. Sadahiro, Y. Maeda, A. Tanaka, K. Okada, and A. Kamijo Optimal duration of prophylactic antibiotic administration for elective colon cancer surgery: arandomized, clinical trial Surgery 149 2011 171 178
7. T.O. Smith, D. Sexton, C. Mann, and S. Donell Sutures versus staples for skin closure in orthopaedic surgery: meta-analysis BMJ 340 2010 c1199
8. A. Johnson, D. Young, and J. Reilly Caesarean section surgical site infection surveillance J Hosp Infect 64 2006 30 35
9. A.A. Shetty, V.S. Kumar, C. Morgan Hough, G.A. Georgeu, K.D. James, and J.E. Nicholl Comparing wound complication rates following closure of hip wounds with metallic skin staples or subcuticular vicryl suture: a prospective randomised trial J Orthop Surg 12 2004 191 193
10. A.J. Mangram, T.C. Horan, M.L. Pearson, L.C. Silver, and W.R. Jarvis Guideline for Prevention of Surgical Site Infection, 1999. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee Am J Infect Control 27 1999 97 132
11. O. Zmora, S. Wexner, L. Hajjar, T. Park, J. Efron, and J. Nogueras et al. Trends in preparation for colorectal surgery: survey of the members of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons Am Surg 69 2003 150 154
12. R.T. Lewis Oral versus systemic antibiotic prophylaxis in elective colon surgery: a randomized study and meta-analysis send a message from the 1990s Can J Surg 45 2002 173 180
13. D.W. Bratzler, P. Houck, J.H. Calhoun, V. Dalton, C. Daly, and R.A. Bonomo et al. Antimicrobial Prophylaxis for Surgery: An Advisory Statement from the National Surgical Infection Prevention Project Clin Infect Dis 38 2004 1706 1715
14. M. van 't Riet, E.W. Steyerberg, J. Nellensteyn, H.J. Bonjer, and J. Jeekel Meta-analysis of techniques for closure of midline abdominal incisions Br J Surg 89 2002 1350 1356
15. M.S. Sajid, U. Parampalli, M.K. Baig, and M.R. McFall A systematic review on the effectiveness of slowly-absorbable versus non-absorbable sutures for abdominal fascial closure following laparotomy Int J Surg 9 2011 615 625
16. A.G. Fiennes Interrupted subcuticular polyglactin sutures for abdominal wounds Ann R Coll Surg Engl 67 1985 121
17. S. Liu, and C. Wu The effect of analgesic technique on postoperative patient-reported outcomes including analgesia: a systematic review Anesth Analg 105 2007 789 808
18. R. Tang, H.H. Chen, Y.L. Wang, C.R. Changchien, J.S. Chen, and K.C. Hsu et al. Risk factors for surgical site infection after elective resection of the colon and rectum: a single-center prospective study of 2,809 consecutive patients Ann Surg 234 2001 181 189
19. L.D. Edwards The epidemiology of 2056 remote site infections and 1966 surgical wound infections occurring in 1865 patients: a four year study of 40,923 operations at Rush-Presbyterian-St. Luke's Hospital, Chicago Ann Surg 184 1976 758 766
20. L. Draaijers, F.R.H. Tempelman, Y.A.M. Botman, W. Tuinebreijer, E. Middelkoop, and R. Kreis et al. The patient and observer scar assessment scale: a reliable and feasible tool for scar evaluation Plast Reconstr Surg 113 2004 1960 1965
21. A.L. van de Kar, L.U.M. Corion, M.J.C. Smeulders, L. Draaijers, C.M.A.M. van der Horst, and P.P.M. van Zuijlen Reliable and feasible evaluation of linear scars by the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale Plast Reconstr Surg 116 2005 514 522
22. J.E. Hollander, A.J. Singer, S. Valentine, and M.C. Henry Wound registry: development and validation Ann Emerg Med 25 1995 675 685
23. K. Ishibashi, K. Kuwabara, T. Ishiguro, T. Ohsawa, N. Okada, and T. Miyazaki et al. Short-term intravenous antimicrobial prophylaxis in combination with preoperative oral antibiotics on surgical site infection and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection in elective colon cancer surgery: results of a prospective randomized trial Surg Today 39 2009 1032 1039
24. L. Kao, A. Ghaferi, C. Ko, and J. Dimick Reliability of superficial surgical site infections as a hospital quality measure J Am Coll Surg 213 2011 231 235
25. X. Serra-Aracil, M. García Domingo, D. Parés, E. Espin Basany, S. Biondo, and X. Guirao et al. Surgical site infection in elective operations for colorectal cancer after the application of preventive measures Arch Surg 146 2011 606 612
26. C.W. Dunnett, and M. Gent Significance testing to establish equivalence between treatments, with special reference to data in the form of 2 x 2 tables Biometrics 33 1977 593 602
27. J. Wittes Sample size calculations for randomized controlled trials Epidemiol Rev 24 2002 39 53
28. S. Basha, M. Rochon, J. Quiñones, K. Coassolo, O. Rust, and J. Smulian Randomized controlled trial of wound complication rates of subcuticular suture vs staples for skin closure at cesarean delivery Am J Obstet Gynecol 203 2010 285.e1 285.e8
29. R.G. Johnson, W.E. Cohn, R.L. Thurer, J.R. McCarthy, C.A. Sirois, and R.M. Weintraub Cutaneous closure after cardiac operations: a controlled, randomized, prospective comparison of intradermal versus staple closures Ann Surg 226 1997 606 612
30. R.M. Stillman, C.A. Marino, and S.J. Seligman Skin staples in potentially contaminated wounds Arch Surg 119 1984 821 822
31. S.D. MacFarlane, and J.A. Ryan Prevention of wound infection after elective colorectal resection Am J Surg 154 1987 482 486
32. M. Taube, R.J. Porter, and P.H. Lord A combination of subcuticular suture and sterile Micropore tape compared with conventional interrupted sutures for skin closure. A controlled trial Ann R Coll Surg Engl 65 1983 164 167
33. H.J. Zwart, and P. de Ruiter Subcuticular, continuous and mechanical skin closure: cosmetic results of a prospective randomized trial Neth J Surg 41 1989 57 60
34. A.B. Cassie, A.K. Chatterjee, S. Mehta, and J.M. Haworth Pain quantum and wound healing: a comparison of interrupted inversion PDS and standard nylon sutures in abdominal skin closure Ann R Coll Surg Engl 70 1988 339 342
35. C.J. Ranaboldo, and D.C. Rowe Jones Closure of laparotomy wounds: skin staples versus sutures Br J Surg 79 1992 1172 1173
36. A. Johnson, G.T. Rodeheaver, L.S. Durand, M.T. Edgerton, and R.F. Edlich Automatic disposable stapling devices for wound closure Ann Emerg Med 10 1981 631 635
37. I. Stockley, and R.A. Elson Skin closure using staples and nylon sutures: a comparison of results Ann R Coll Surg Engl 69 1987 76 78