Bow-tie diagrams in downstream hazard identification and risk assessment

Process Safety Progress

Volumn 33, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 26-35

  Saud, Yaneira E ^a  

^a Chris)   (United States)

Author keywords

Bow tie; Bow tie diagram; Cause consequence; Hazard identification; Risk assessment; Risk management

Indexed keywords

EID: 84894069207     PISSN: 10668527     EISSN: 15475913     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/prs.11576     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Center for Chemical Process Safety (CCPS), Guidelines for Hazard Evaluation Procedures, 3rd Ed., Wiley, Hoboken, New Jersey, 2008.
2. P. Hudson, Leiden University of the Netherlands & Delft University of Technology, The Netherlands, Integrating Organization Culture into Incident Analyses: Extending the Bow Tie Model. SPE International Conference on Health Safety and Environment, Vol. 4, 2010, 2662-2674.
3. 29 CFR 1910.119 Process Safety Management of Highly Hazardous Chemicals, 1992.
4. 40 CFR Part 68 Risk Management Program (RMP) Rule, 2009.
5. CFR Part 250 Subpart S, Safety and Environmental Management Systems, October 2010.
6. American Petroleum Institute, API Recommended Practice 75, Recommended Practice for Development of a Safety and Environment Management Program for Offshore Operations and Facilities, 3rd Ed., 2004, reaffirmed May 2008.
7. National Commission on the BP Deepwater Horizon, The Gulf Oil Disaster and the Future of Offshore Drilling-Report to the President, January 2011.
8. Center for Chemical Process Safety (CCPS), Guidelines for Risk Based Process Safety, Wiley, Hoboken, New Jersey, 2007.
9. International Association of Drilling Contractors (IADC) Health, Safety, and Environment Case Guideline for Mobile Offshore Drilling Units, Issue 3.3, Houston, Texas, IADC. December 1, 2010.
10. International Association of Drilling Contractors (IADC) Health, Safety, and Environment Case Guideline for Land Drilling Units, Issue 1.0.1, Houston, Texas, IADC, July 27, 2009.
11. International Standard ISO 17776 Petroleum and Gas Natural Industries-Offshore production installations, Guidelines on tools and techniques for hazard identification and risk assessment, October 15, 2000.
12. ANSI/ASSE Z690.2-2011, Risk Management Principles and Guidelines, National Adoption of ISO 31000:2009.
13. ANSI/ASSE Z690.2-2011, Risk Assessment Techniques, National Adoption of IEC/ISO 31010:2009.
14. SafeWork Australia Guide for Major Hazard Facilities Safety Assessments, March 2012.
15. Guidelines for the Management of Safety Critical Elements, 2nd Ed., Energy Institute, London, UK, 2007.
16. UK Health and Safety Executive, Developing Process Safety Indicators, HSG254, 2006.
17. American Petroleum Institute, API Recommended Practice 754, Process Safety Performance Indicators for the Refining and Petrochemical Industries, American Petroleum Institute, Washington D.C., 2010.
18. P. Davidson and S.D. Mooney, Key Safety Roles in Organizational Changes, Wiley InterScience, 2009.
19. F. Jones and K. Israni, Environmental Risk Assessment Using Bow-tie Methodology, 2012.
20. T. Whipple and R. Pitblado, Applied Risk-Based Process Safety: A Consolidated Risk Register and Focus on Risk Communication, Wiley InterScience, 2009.
21. P. Davidson and S.D. Mooney, Key Safety Roles in Organizational Changes, Wiley InterScience, 2009.