Academic publishing: Past and future

Management (France)

Volumn 16, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 739-756

  Forgues, Bernard ^a   Liarte, Sébastien ^b  

^a EMLYON BUSINESS SCHOOL   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE LORRAINE   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84894068400     PISSN: 12864892     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3917/mana.165.0739     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Baum, J. A. C. (2013). The Excess-Tail Ratio: Correcting Journal Impact Factors for Citation Distributions. M@n@gement, 16(5), 697-706.
2. Beattie, V., & Goodacre, A. (2006). A New Method for Ranking Academic Journals in Accounting and Finance. Accounting & Business Research, 36(2), 65-91.
3. Björk, B.- C. (2004). Open Access to Scientific Publications: An Analysis of the Barriers to Change. Information Research, 9(2), Paper 170. Retrieved from: http://www.informationr.net/ir/9- 2/paper170.html
4. Competition Commission (2001). Reed Elsevier Plc and Harcourt General, Inc: A Report on the Proposed Merger. London: Competition Commission.
5. Delgado López-Cózar, E., Robinson-García, N., & Torres-Salinas, D. (Forthcoming). The Google Scholar Experiment: How To Index False Papers and Manipulate Bibliometric Indicators. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology.
6. Edlin, A. S., & Rubinfeld, D. L. (2004). Exclusion or Efficient Pricing: The Big Deal Bundling of Academic Journals. Antitrust Law Journal, 72(1), 119-157.
7. Forgues, B., & Forray, J. M. (2008). Running an Electronic Journal: Considerations and Possibilities. In Y. Baruch, A. M. Konrad, H. Aguinis, & W. H. Starbuck (Eds.), Opening the Black Box of Editorship (pp. 197-205). London: Palgrave-Macmillan.
8. Grey, C. (2010). Organizing Studies: Publications, Politics and Polemic. Organization Studies, 31(6), 677-694.
9. Hajjem, C., Harnad, S., & Gingras, Y. (2005). Ten-Year Cross-Disciplinary Comparison of the Growth of Open Access and How it Increases Research Citation Impact. IEEE Data Engineering Bulletin, 28(4), 39-47.
10. Hannan, M. T., & Carroll, G. R. (1992). Dynamics of Organizational Populations: Density, Legitimation, and Competition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
11. Harnad, S. (1995). Electronic Scholarly Publication: Quo Vadis? Serials Review, 21(1), 70-72.
12. Harnad, S., Brody, T., Vallières, F., Carr, L., Hitchcock, S., Gingras, Y., Oppenheim, C., Stamerjohanns, H., & Hilf, E. (2004). The Green and the Gold Roads to Open Access. Nature, 17. Retrieved from: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/259940/1/21.html
13. Johnson, C. Y. (2012, April 28). Harvard Panel Pushes Benefits of Free Journals: Costly Publications Targeted. The Boston Globe.
14. Kipping, M., üsdiken, B., & Puig, N. (2004). Imitation, Tension, and Hybridization: Multiple "Americanizations" of Management Education in Mediterranean Europe. Journal of Management Inquiry, 13(2), 98-108.
15. Laakso, M., Welling, P., Bukvova, H., Nyman, L., Björk, B.-C., & Hedlund, T. (2011). The Development of Open Access Journal Publishing from 1993 to 2009. PLoS ONE, 6(6), e20961.
16. Leydesdorff, L. (2008). Caveats for the Use of Citation Indicators in Research and Journal Evaluations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(2), 278-287.
17. Mabe, M. (2003). The Growth and Number of Journals. Serials, 16(2), 191-197.
18. Mabe, M., & Amin, M. (2001). Growth Dynamics of Scholarly and Scientific Journals. Scientometrics, 51(1), 147-162.
19. Miller, D. (2012). Open Access, Scholarship, and Digital Anthropology. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, 2(1), 385-411.
20. Morrison, H. (2012). Freedom for Scholarship in the Internet Age. (Unpublished dissertation). Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, Canada.
21. Rossner, M., Van Epps, H., & Hill, E. (2007). Show Me the Data. Journal of Cell Biology, 179(6), 1091-1092.
22. Schekman, R. (2013, December 9). How Journals Like Nature, Cell and Science Are Damaging Science. The Guardian.
23. Scherer, F. M., & Ross, D. (1990). Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance (3rd ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
24. Seglen, P. O. (1997). Why the Impact Factor of Journals Should Not Be Used for Evaluating Research. British Medical Journal, 314(7079), 497-502.
25. Starbuck, W. H. (2013). Why and Where Do Academics Publish? M@n@gement, 16(5), 707-718.
26. Swan, A. (2010). The Open Access Citation Advantage: Studies and Results to Date. Southampton: University of Southampton.
27. The Economist (2001, May 12). Journal Wars: Big Publishers Are Tightening their Grip on the Lucrative Science-Journal Market.
28. Tillery, K. (2012). 2012 Study of Subscription Prices for Scholarly Society Journals. Allen Press. Retrieved from: http:// allenpress.com/system/files/pdfs/ library/2012_AP_JPS.pdf
29. Vaara, E. (2000). Constructions of Cultural Differences in Post-Merger Change Processes: A Sensemaking Perspective on Finnish- Swedish Cases. M@n@gement, 3(3), 81-110.
30. Velterop, J. J. J. M. (2005). Open Access Publishing and Scholarly Societies: A Guide. Open Society Institute. Retrieved from: http://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/ pdf/open_access_publishing_and_ scholarly_societies.pdf
31. Wellcome Trust (2004). Costs and Business Models in Scientific Research Publishing. London: Wellcome Trust.
32. Williams, L. J. (2008). Reflections on Creating a New Scholarly Journal: Perspectives from a Founding Editor. In Y. Baruch, A. M. Konrad, H. Aguinis & W. H. Starbuck (Eds.), Opening the Black Box of Editorship (pp. 188-196). London: Palgrave-Macmillan.
33. Willinsky, J. (2006). The Access Principle: The Case for Open Access to Research and Scholarship. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
34. Willmott, H. (2011). Journal List Fetishism and the Perversion of Scholarship: Reactivity and the ABS List. Organization, 18(4), 429-442.
35. Yoon, C. K. (1998, December 8). Soaring Prices Spur a Revolt in Scientific Publishing. The New York Times.