Outcomes after management of young women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2 with a 6-month observation protocol

Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease

Volumn 18, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 46-49

  Bleecker, Elizabeth ^a   Koehler, Elizabeth ^b   Smith, Jennifer ^b   Budwit, Debra ^c   Rahangdale, Lisa ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^b University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

cervical intraepithelial neoplasia; CIN 2; colposcopy; follow up

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; BIOPSY; CERVICAL INTRAEPITHELIAL NEOPLASIA; FEMALE; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HISTOCYTOCHEMISTRY; HUMANS; OBSERVATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84894053380     PISSN: 10892591     EISSN: 15260976     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/LGT.0b013e3182901ef3     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Darragh TM, Colgan T, Cox JT, Heller DS, Henry MR, Luff RD, et al. The Lower Anogenital Squamous Terminology Standardization Project for HPV-associated lesions: Background and consensus recommendations from the College of American Pathologists and the American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology. J Low Genit Tract Dis 2012;16: 205-42.
2. Waxman AG, Chelmow D, Darragh TM, Lawson H, Mosicki A. Revised terminology for cervical histopathology and its implications for management of high-grade intraepithelial lesions. Obstet Gynecol 2013;120:1465-71.
3. Carreon JD, Sherman ME, Gullen D, Solomon D, Herrero R, Jeronimo J, et al. CIN2 is a much less reproducible and less valid diagnosis than CIN3: Results from a histological review of population-based cervical samples. Int J Gynecol Pathol 2007;26:441-6.
4. Fuchs K, Weitzen S, Wu L, Phipps MG, Boardman LA. Management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2 in adolescent and young women. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol 2007;20: 269-74.
5. Chan JK, Monk BJ, Brewer C, Keefe KA, Osann K, McMeekin S, et al. HPV infection and the number of lifetime sexual partners are strong predictor for 'natural' regression of CIN 2 and. Br J Cancer 2003;15:1062-6.
6. Castle PE, Schiffman M, Wheeller CM, Solomon D. Evidence for frequent regression of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia ? grade. Obstet Gynecol 2009;113:18-25.
7. McAllum B, Sykes PH, Sadler L, Macnab H, Simcock BL, Mikhail AK. Is the treatment of CIN2 always necessary in women under 25 years old Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011; 205:478.e1Ye7.
8. Bevis KS, Biggio Jr. Cervical conization and the risk of preterm delivery. AJOG 2011;205:19-27.
9. Wright TC Jr, Massad LS, Dunton CJ, Spitzer M, Wilkinson EJ, et al. 2006 consensus guidelines for the management of women with abnormal cervical cancer screening tests. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007;197:346-55.
10. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Practice Bulletin No.99: Management of abnormal cervical cytology and histology. Obstet Gynecol 2008;112: 1419-44.
11. Vodopivec-Jamsek V, de Jongh T, Gurol-Urganci I, Atun R, Car J. Mobile phone messaging for preventative health care. Cochran Database Syst Rev 2012;12:CD007457.
12. Wittaker R,McRobbieH, Bullen C, Borland R, Rodgers A, et al. Mobile phoneYbased interventions for smoking cessation. Cochran Database Syst Rev 2012;12:CD006611.
13. Ahlers-Schmidt CR, Chesser AK, Nguyen T, Brannon J, Hart TA, et al. Feasibiliy of a randomized controlled trial to evaluate Text Reminders for Immunization Compliance in Kids (TRICKs). Vaccine 2012;30:5305-9.