A comparison of extraperitoneal versus transperitoneal laparoscopic or robotic para-aortic lymphadenectomy for staging of endometrial carcinoma

Gynecologic Oncology

Volumn 132, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 366-371

  Pakish, Janelle ^a   Soliman, Pamela T ^b   Frumovitz, Michael ^b   Westin, Shannon N ^b   Schmeler, Kathleen M ^b   Reis, Ricardo Dos ^c   Munsell, Mark F ^b   Ramirez, Pedro T ^b  

^a DARTMOUTH HITCHCOCK MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER   (United States)

^c BARRETOS CANCER HOSPITAL   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Extraperitoneal para aortic lymphadenectomy; Laparoscopic surgery; Robotic surgery; Uterine cancer

Indexed keywords

EXTRAPERITONEAL PARA-AORTIC LYMPHADENECTOMY; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; ROBOTIC SURGERY; UTERINE CANCER;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ENDOMETRIAL NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; HUMANS; LYMPH NODE EXCISION; LYMPH NODES; LYMPHATIC METASTASIS; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM STAGING; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84894027918     PISSN: 00908258     EISSN: 10956859     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.12.019     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. American Cancer Society Cancer facts & figs. 2013 2013 American Cancer Society Atlanta
2. C. Morrow, B. Bundy, R. Kurman, W. Creasman, P. Heller, and H. Homesley et al. Relationship between surgical-pathological risk factors and outcome in clinical stage I and II carcinoma of the endometrium (a Gynecologic Oncology Group study) Gynecol Oncol 40 1991 55 65
3. ASTEC study group, H. Kitchener, A.M. Swart, Q. Qian, C. Amos, and M.K. Parmar Efficacy of systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer (MRC ASTEC trial): a randomised study Lancet 373 9658 2009 125 136
4. Y. Todo, H. Kato, M. Kaneuchi, H. Watari, M. Takeda, and N. Sakuragi Survival effect of para-aortic lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer (SEPAL study): a retrospective cohort analysis Lancet 375 9721 2010 1165 1172
5. J.M. Cragun, L.J. Havrilesky, B. Calingaert, I. Synam, A.A. Secord, and J.T. Soper et al. Retrospective analysis of selective lymphadenectomy in apparent early-stage endometrial cancer J Clin Oncol 23 2005 3368 3375
6. A. Mariani, M.J. Webb, L. Galli, and K.C. Podratz Potential therapeutic role of para-aortic lymphadenectomy in node-positive endometrial cancer Gynecol Oncol 76 2000 348 356
7. Y. Todo, H. Kato, S. MInobe, K. Okamoto, Y. Suzuki, and S. Sudo et al. Initial failure site according to primary treatment with or without para-aortic lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer Gynecol Oncol 121 2011 314 318
8. J.L. Walker, M.R. Piedmonte, N.M. Spirtos, S.M. Eisenkop, J.B. Schlaerth, and R.S. Mannel et al. Laparoscopy compared with laparotomy for comprehensive surgical staging of uterine cancer: Gynecologic Oncology Group study LAP2 J Clin Oncol 27 2009 5331 5336
9. S.C. Dowdy, G. Aletti, W.A. Cliby, K.C. Podratz, and A. Mariani Extra-peritoneal laparoscopic para-aortic lymphadenectomy - a prospective cohort study of 293 patients with endometrial cancer Gynecol Oncol 111 2008 418 424
10. P.T. Ramirez, A. Jhingran, H.A. Macapinlac, E.D. Euscher, M.F. Munsell, and R.L. Coleman et al. Laparoscopic extraperitoneal para-aortic lymphadenectomy in locally advanced cervical cancer: a prospective correlation of surgical findings with positron emission tomography/computed tomography findings Cancer 117 2011 1928 1934
11. P.T. Ramirez, and M.R. Milam Laparoscopic extraperitoneal paraaortic lymphadenectomy in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer Gynecol Oncol 104 2 Suppl. 1 2007 9 12
12. D. Dargent, Y. Ansquer, and P. Mathevet Technical development and results of left extraperitoneal laparoscopic paraaortic lymphadenectomy for cervical cancer Gynecol Oncol 77 2000 87 92
13. S. Nagao, K. Fujiwara, R. Kagawa, Y. Kozuka, T. Oda, and K. Maehata et al. Feasibility of extraperitoneal laparoscopic para-aortic and common iliac lymphadenectomy Gynecol Oncol 103 2006 732 735
14. V. Benito, A. Lubrano, O. Arencibia, M. Andujar, B. Pinar, and N. Medina et al. Laparoscopic extraperitoneal para-aortic lymphadenectomy in the staging of locally advanced cervical cancer: is it a feasible procedure at a peripheral center? Int J Gynecol Cancer 22 2012 332 336
15. N.T. Shah, K.N. Wright, G.M. Jonsdottir, S. Jorgensen, J.I. Einarsson, and M.G. Muto The feasibility of societal cost equivalence between robotic hysterectomy and alternate hysterectomy methods for endometrial cancer Obstet Gynecol Int 2011 2011 1 9
16. J.C. Barnett, J.P. Judd, J.M. Wu, C.D. Scales Jr., E.R. Myers, and L.J. Havrilesky Cost comparison among robotic, laparoscopic, and open hysterectomy for endometrial cancer Obstet Gynecol 116 2010 685 693