Higher Moral Obligations of Tolerance Toward Other Minorities: An Extra Burden on Stigmatized Groups

Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

Volumn 40, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 363-376

  Fernández, Saulo ^a   Branscombe, Nyla R ^b   Saguy, Tamar ^c   Gómez, Ángel ^a   Morales, J Francisco ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE EDUCACIÓN A DISTANCIA   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS   (United States)

^c INTERDISCIPLINARY CENTER   (Israel)

Author keywords

intergroup relations; just world; moral obligations; social stigma; tolerance; victimhood

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERGROUP RELATIONS; JUST WORLD; MALE; MINORITY GROUP; MORALITY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; SOCIAL STIGMA; TOLERANCE; VICTIMHOOD;

INTERGROUP RELATIONS; JUST WORLD; MORAL OBLIGATIONS; SOCIAL STIGMA; TOLERANCE; VICTIMHOOD;

ADULT; ATTITUDE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MINORITY GROUPS; MORAL OBLIGATIONS; SOCIAL STIGMA;

EID: 84893867406     PISSN: 01461672     EISSN: 15527433     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0146167213512208     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Aguiar P.,Vala J.,Correia I.,Pereira C.Justice in our world and in that of others: Belief in a just world and reactions to victims.Social Justice Research. 2008;21:50-68.
2. Anderson J. E.,Kay A. C.,Fitzsimons G. M.In search of the silver lining: The justice motive fosters perceptions of benefits in the later lives of tragedy victims.Psychological Science. 2010;21:1599-1604.
3. Branscombe N. R.,Warner R. H.,Klar Y.,Fernández S."They should know better": Why third-party observers assign moral obligations to victimized groups. 2013;:.
4. Chen E. S.,Tyler T. R.The use and abuse of power: Multiple perspectives on the causes of corruption. Lee-Chai A. Y.Bargh J. A., ed. New York, NY: Psychology Press; 2001:241-261.
5. Cohrs J.,Stelzl M.How ideological attitudes predict host society members' attitudes toward immigrants: Exploring cross national differences.Journal of Social Issues. 2010;66:673-694.
6. Correia I.,Vala J.When will a victim be secondarily victimized? The effect of observer's belief in a just world, victim's innocence and persistence of suffering.Social Justice Research. 2003;16:379-400.
7. Cottrell C. A.,Neuberg S. L.Different emotional reactions to different groups: A sociofunctional threat-based approach to "prejudice.".Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2005;88:770-789.
8. Craig M. A.,DeHart T.,Richeson J. A.,Fiedorowicz L.Do unto others as others have done unto you? Perceiving sexism influences women's evaluations of stigmatized racial groups.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 2012;38:1107-1119.
9. Craig M. A.,Richeson J. A.Coalition or derogation? How perceived discrimination influences intraminority intergroup relations.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2012;102:759-777.
10. Eberhardt J. L.,Goff P.,Purdie V. J.,Davies P. G.Seeing Black: Race, crime, and visual processing.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2004;87:876-893.
11. Gouvier W.,Sytsma-Jordan S.,Mayville S.Patterns of discrimination in hiring job applicants with disabilities: The role of disability type, job complexity, and public contact.Rehabilitation Psychology. 2003;48:175-181.
12. HayesA. F. (2012). PROCESS: A versatile computational tool for observed variable mediation, moderation, and conditional process modeling [White paper]. Retrieved from http://www.afhayes.com/public/process2012.pdf.
13. Lerner M. J.The belief in a just world: A fundamental delusion. New York, NY: Plenum; 1980:.
14. Leyens J.,Rodriguez-Perez A.,Rodriguez-Torres R.,Gaunt R.,Paladino M.,Vaes J.,Demoulin S.Psychological essentialism and the differential attribution of uniquely human emotions to ingroups and outgroups.European Journal of Social Psychology. 2001;31:395-411.
15. Major B.,O'Brien L. T.The social psychology of stigma.Annual Review of Psychology. 2005;56:393-421.
16. Schmitt M. T.,Branscombe N. R.The meaning and consequences of perceived discrimination in disadvantaged and privileged social groups.European Review of Social Psychology. 2002;12:167-199.
17. Spencer S. J.,Zanna M. P.,Fong G. T.Establishing a causal chain: Why experiments are often more effective than mediational analyses in examining psychological processes.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2005;89:845-851.
18. Truxillo D.,Bauer T.,Sanchez R.Multiple dimensions of procedural justice: Longitudinal effects on selection system fairness and test-taking self-efficacy.International Journal of Selection and Assessment. 2001;9:336-349.
19. Warner R. H.,Branscombe N. R.Observers' benefit finding for victims: Consequences for perceived moral obligations.European Journal of Social Psychology. 2011;41:241-253.
20. Warner R. H.,Branscombe N. R.Observer perceptions of moral obligations in groups with a history of victimization.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 2012;38:882-894.
21. Warner R. H.,Branscombe N. R.,Garczynski A. M.,Solomon E. D.Judgments of sexual abuse victims.Basic and Applied Social Psychology. 2011;33:207-219.
22. Wohl M. J. A.,Branscombe N. R.Remembering historical victimization: Collective guilt for current ingroup transgressions.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2008;94:988-1006.