Erratum to: Investigating the role of articulatory organs and perceptual assimilation in infants' discrimination of native and non-native fricative place contrasts: Infant Perception of Native and Non-Native Fricatives (Developmental Psychobiology, (2014), 56, 2, (210-227), 10.1002/dev.21195);Investigating the role of articulatory organs and perceptual assimilation of native and non-native fricative place contrasts

Developmental Psychobiology

Volumn 56, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 210-227

  Tyler, Michael D ^a,b   Best, Catherine T ^a,c   Goldstein, Louis M ^c,d   Antoniou, Mark ^a,e  

^a WESTERN SYDNEY UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN SYDNEY   (Australia)

^c Haskins Laboratories   (Japan)

^d UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^e CHINESE UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

Articulatory organs; Cross language speech perception; Fricatives; Infants; Native language attunement; Perceptual assimilation model; Perceptual narrowing

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ARTICULATORY ORGANS; CHILD DEVELOPMENT; CROSS-LANGUAGE SPEECH PERCEPTION; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; FEMALE; FRICATIVES; HUMAN; INFANT; INFANTS; LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT; MALE; NATIVE-LANGUAGE ATTUNEMENT; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; PERCEPTUAL ASSIMILATION MODEL; PERCEPTUAL NARROWING; PHYSIOLOGY; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

ARTICULATORY ORGANS; CROSS-LANGUAGE SPEECH PERCEPTION; FRICATIVES; INFANTS; NATIVE-LANGUAGE ATTUNEMENT; PERCEPTUAL ASSIMILATION MODEL; PERCEPTUAL NARROWING;

CHILD DEVELOPMENT; DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; FEMALE; HUMANS; INFANT; LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT; MALE; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

EID: 84893854428     PISSN: 00121630     EISSN: 10982302     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/dev.21612     Document Type: Erratum

References (63)

1. Aslin, R. N., & Pisoni, D. B. (1980). Some developmental processes in speech perception. In: G. H. Yeni-Komshian, J. Kavanagh, & C. A. Ferguson (Eds.), Child phonology (Vol. 2, pp. 67-96). New York, NY: Academic Press.
2. Aslin, R. N., Werker, J. F., & Morgan, J. L. (2002). Innate phonetic boundaries revisited (L). Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 112, 1257-1260.
3. Best, C. T. (1994a). Learning to perceive the sound pattern of English. In: C. Rovee-Collier & L. P. Lipsitt (Eds.), Advances in infancy research (Vol. 9, pp. 217-304). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
4. Best, C. T. (1994b). The emergence of language-specific phonemic influences in infant speech perception. In: J. C. Goodman & H. C. Nusbaum (Eds.), The development of speech perception (pp. 167-224). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
5. Best, C. T. (1995). A direct realist view of cross-language speech perception. In: W. Strange (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research (pp. 171-204). Baltimore, MD: York Press.
6. Best, C. T., & Jones, C. (1998). Stimulus-alternation preference procedure to test infant speech discrimination. Infant Behavior and Development, 21, 295.
7. Best, C. T., & McRoberts, G. W. (2003). Infant perception of non-native consonant contrasts that adults assimilate in different ways. Language and Speech, 46, 183-216.
8. Best, C. T., McRoberts, G. W., & Goodell, E. (2001). Discrimination of non-native consonant contrasts varying in perceptual assimilation to the listener's native phonological system. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 109, 775-794.
9. Best, C. T., McRoberts, G. W., LaFleur, R., & Silver-Isenstadt, J. (1995). Divergent developmental patterns for infants' perception of two non-native consonant contrasts. Infant Behavior and Development, 18, 339-350.
10. Best, C. T., McRoberts, G. W., & Sithole, N. M. (1988). Examination of perceptual reorganization for non-native speech contrasts: Zulu click discrimination by English-speaking adults and infants. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14, 345-360.
11. Best, C. T., Tyler, M. D., Gooding, T. N., Orlando, C. B., & Quann, C. A. (2009). Development of phonological constancy: Toddlers' perception of native- and Jamaican-accented words. Psychological Science, 20, 539-542.
12. Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2009). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer (Version 4.5.4.4). Institute of Phonetic Sciences, University of Amsterdam [Computer program]. Retrieved January 12, 2007, from http://www.praat.org/
13. Boyce, S. E., & Espy-Wilson, C. Y. (1997). Coarticulatory stability in American English /r/. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 101, 3741-3753.
14. Browman, C. P., & Goldstein, L. (1990). Gestural specification using dynamically-defined articulatory structures. Journal of Phonetics, 18, 299-320.
15. Browman, C. P., & Goldstein, L. (1992). Articulatory phonology: An overview. Phonetica, 49, 155-180.
16. Browman, C. P., & Goldstein, L. (1995). Gestural syllable position effects in American English. In: F. Bell-Berti & L. J. Raphael (Eds.), Producing speech: Contemporary issues (pp. 19-33). Woodbury, NY: AIP Press.
17. Browman, C. P., & Goldstein, L. (2000). Competing constraints on intergestural coordination and self-organization of phonological structures. Bulletin de la Communication Parlée, 5, 25-34.
18. Burnham, D. K. (1986). Developmental loss of speech perception: Exposure to and experience with a first language. Applied Psycholinguistics, 7, 207-240.
19. Carlson, B. F., Esling, J. H., & Fraser, K. (2001). Nuuchahnulth. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 31, 275-279.
20. Cohen, L. B. (2004). Uses and misuses of habituation and related preference paradigms. Infant and Child Development, 13, 349-352.
21. Cox, F., & Palethorpe, S. (2007). Australian English. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 37, 341-350.
22. Cristia, A., McGuire, G. L., Seidl, A., & Francis, A. L. (2011). Effects of the distribution of acoustic cues on infants' perception of sibilants. Journal of Phonetics, 39, 388-402.
23. Curtin, S., Byers-Heinlein, K., & Werker, J. F. (2011). Bilingual beginnings as a lens for theory development: PRIMIR in focus. Journal of Phonetics, 39, 492-504.
24. Eilers, R. E., Gavin, W., & Wilson, W. R. (1979). Linguistic experience and phonemic perception in infancy: A crosslinguistic study. Child Development, 50, 14-18.
25. Eilers, R. E., Wilson, W. R., & Moore, J. M. (1977). Developmental changes in speech discrimination in infants. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 20, 766-780.
26. Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
27. Gibson, J. J., & Gibson, E. J. (1955). Perceptual learning: Differentiation or enrichment? Psychological Review, 62, 32-41.
28. Goldstein, L., & Fowler, C. A. (2003). Articulatory phonology: A phonology for public language use. In: N. O. Schiller & A. S. Meyer (Eds.), Phonetics and phonology in language comprehension and production: Differences and similarities (pp. 159-208). Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter.
29. Gottlieb, G. (1976). The roles of experience in the development of behavior and the nervous system. In: G. Gottlieb (Ed.), Neural and behavioral plasticity (pp. 25-54). New York, NY: Academic Press.
30. Guenther, F. H., Espy-Wilson, C. Y., Boyce, S. E., Matthies, M. L., Zandipour, M., & Perkell, J. S. (1999). Articulatory tradeoffs reduce acoustic variability during American English /r/ production. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 105, 2854-2865.
31. Harnsberger, J. D. (2001). On the relationship between identification and discrimination of non-native nasal consonants. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 110, 489-503.
32. Houston, D. M., Horn, D. L., Qi, R., Ting, J. Y., & Gao, S. (2007). Assessing speech discrimination in individual infants. Infancy, 12, 119-145.
33. Jongman, A., Wayland, R., & Wong, S. (2000). Acoustic characteristics of English fricatives. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 108, 1252-1263.
34. Kitamura, C., Panneton, R., & Best, C. T. (2013). The development of language constancy: Attention to native versus non-native accents. Child Development, 64, 1686-1700. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12068
35. Kuhl, P. K. (1980). Perceptual constancy for speech-sound categories in early infancy. In: G. H. Yeni-Komshian, J. Kavanagh, & C. A. Ferguson (Eds.), Child phonology (Vol. 2, pp. 41-66). New York, NY: Academic Press.
36. Kuhl, P. K., Conboy, B. T., Coffey-Corina, S., Padden, D., Rivera-Gaxiola, M., & Nelson, T. (2008). Phonetic learning as a pathway to language: New data and native language magnet theory expanded (NLM-e). Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 363, 979-1000.
37. Kuhl, P. K., Stevens, E., Hayashi, A., Deguchi, T., Kiritani, S., & Iverson, P. (2006). Infants show a facilitation effect for native language phonetic perception between 6 and 12 months. Developmental Science, 9, F13-F21.
38. Levitt, A., Jusczyk, P. W., Murray, J., & Carden, G. (1988). Context effects in two-month-old infants' perception of labiodental/interdental fricative contrasts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14, 361-368.
39. Maddieson, I. (1984). Patterns of sounds. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
40. Mattock, K., Molnar, M., Polka, L., & Burnham, D. (2008). The developmental course of lexical tone perception in the first year of life. Cognition, 106, 1367-1381.
41. Meltzoff, A. N., & Moore, M. K. (1977). Imitation of facial and manual gestures by human neonates. Science, 198, 75-78.
42. Miller, C. L. (1983). Developmental changes in male/female voice classification by infants. Infant Behavior and Development, 6, 313-330.
43. Mulak, K., & Best, C. T. (2013). Development of word recognition across speakers and accents. In: L. Gogate & G. Hollich (Eds.), Theoretical and computational models of word learning: Trends in psychology and artificial intelligence (pp. 242-269). Hershey, PA: IGI Global-Robotics.
44. Narayan, C. R., Werker, J. F., & Beddor, P. S. (2010). The interaction between acoustic salience and language experience in developmental speech perception: Evidence from nasal place discrimination. Developmental Science, 13, 407-420.
45. Nittrouer, S. (2001). Challenging the notion of innate phonetic boundaries. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 110, 1598-1605.
46. Nittrouer, S. (2002). A reply to "Innate phonetic boundaries revisited" [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 112, 1257-1260 (2002)] (L). Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 112, 1261-1264.
47. Oakes, L. M. (2010). Using habituation of looking time to assess mental processes in infancy. Journal of Cognitive Development, 11, 255-268.
48. Polka, L. (1991). Cross-language speech perception in adults: Phonemic, phonetic, and acoustic contributions. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 89, 2961-2977.
49. Polka, L., Colantonio, C., & Sundara, M. (2001). A cross-language comparison of /d/-/{eth}/ perception: Evidence for a new developmental pattern. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 109, 2190-2201.
50. Stone, M., & Lundberg, A. (1996). Three-dimensional tongue surface shapes of English consonants and vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 99, 3728-3737.
51. Strange, W., Akahane-Yamada, R., Kubo, R., Trent, S. A., Nishi, K., & Jenkins, J. J. (1998). Perceptual assimilation of American English vowels by Japanese listeners. Journal of Phonetics, 26, 311-344.
52. Studdert-Kennedy, M. (1991). Language development from an evolutionary perspective. In: N. A. Krasnegor, D. M. Rumbaugh, M. Schiefelbusch, & M. Studdert-Kennedy (Eds.), Language acquisition: Biological and behavioral determinants (pp. 5-28). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
53. Studdert-Kennedy, M., & Goldstein, L. (2003). Launching language: The gestural origin of discrete infinity. In: M. H. Christiansen & S. Kirby (Eds.), Language evolution (pp. 235-254). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
54. Sundara, M., Polka, L., & Genesee, F. (2006). Language-experience facilitates discrimination of /d-{eth}/ in monolingual and bilingual acquisition of English. Cognition, 100, 369-388.
55. Trehub, S. E. (1976). The discrimination of foreign speech contrasts by infants and adults. Child Development, 47, 466-472.
56. Tyler, M. D., & Best, C. T. (2010). Discrimination of non-native fricative contrasts by English monolinguals and Arabic-English. In: N. Voudouris & V. Mrowinski (Eds.), Combined abstracts of 2010 Australian psychology conferences (p. 39). Melbourne, Victoria, Australia: Australian Psychological Society Ltd.
57. Tyler, M. D., Best, C. T., Faber, A., Levitt, A. (in press). Perceptual assimilation of non-native vowel contrasts. Phonetica. doi: 10.1159/000356237
58. Werker, J. F. (1995). Exploring developmental changes in cross-language speech perception. In: D. N. Osherson (Series Ed.), L. R. Gleitman & M. Liberman (Vol. Eds.), An invitation to cognitive science, Vol. 1 Language (2nd ed., pp. 87-106). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
59. Werker, J. F., & Curtin, S. (2005). PRIMIR: A developmental framework of infant speech processing. Language Learning and Development, 1, 197-234.
60. Werker, J. F., Gilbert, J. H. V., Humphrey, K., & Tees, R. C. (1981). Developmental aspects of cross-language speech perception. Child Development, 52, 349-355.
61. Werker, J. F., & Lalonde, C. E. (1988). Cross-language speech perception: Initial capabilities and developmental change. Developmental Psychology, 24, 672-683.
62. Werker, J. F., & Logan, J. S. (1985). Cross-language evidence for three factors in speech perception. Perception & Psychophysics, 37, 35-44.
63. Werker, J. F., & Tees, R. C. (1984). Cross-language speech perception: Evidence for perceptual reorganization during the first year of life. Infant Behavior and Development, 7, 49-63.