Pattern of stress distribution in different bracket-adhesive-tooth systems due to debonding load application

Orthodontic Waves

Volumn 73, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 8-16

  Hajizadeh, Maryam ^a   Ghalichi, Farzan ^a   Mirzakouchaki, Behnam ^b   Shahrbaf, Shirin ^c  

^a SAHAND UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Iran)

^b TABRIZ UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (Iran)

^c Academic Unit of Restorative Dentistry   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Bonding; Bracket adhesive tooth system; FEM; Micro CT images

Indexed keywords

EID: 84893843877     PISSN: 13440241     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.odw.2013.11.018     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Hobson R.S., McCabe J.F., Hogg S.D. Bond strength to surface enamel for different tooth types. Dent Mater 2001, 17(2):184-189.
2. Powers J.M., Kim H.B., Turner D.S. Orthodontic adhesives and bond strength testing. Semin Orthod 1997, 3:147-156.
3. Knoll M., Gwinnett A.J., Wolff M.S. Shear strength of brackets bonded to anterior and posterior teeth. Am J Orthod 1986, 89(6):476-479.
4. Katona T.R. The effects of load location and misalignment on shear/peel testing of direct bonded orthodontic brackets-a finite element model. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1994, 106(4):395-402.
5. Bishara S.E., Sulieman O.M.S. Comparisons of debonding force between different tooth types. Hellenic Orthod Rev 1999, 2(1):9-16.
6. Algera T.J., Feilzer A.J., Prahl-Andersen B., Kleverlaan C.J. A comparison of finite element analysis with in vitro bond strength tests of the bracket-cement-enamel system. Eur J Orthod 2011, 33(6):608-612.
7. Hioki M., Shin-Ya A., Nakahara R., Vallittu P.K., Nakasone Y. Shear bond strength and FEM of a resin-modified glass ionomer cement-effects of tooth enamel shape and orthodontic bracket base configuration. Dent Mater J 2007, 26(5):700-707.
8. Knox J., Kralj B., Hubsch P., Middleton J., Jones M.L. An evaluation of the quality of orthodontic attachment offered by single- and double-mesh bracket bases using the finite element method of stress analysis. Angle Orthod 2001, 71(2):149-155.
9. Knox J., Kralj B., Hubsch P.F., Middleton J., Jones M.L. An evaluation of the influence of orthodontic adhesive on the stresses generated in a bonded bracket finite element model. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2001, 119(1):43-53.
10. Farah J.W., Craig R.G., Meroueh K.A. Finite element analysis of a mandibular model. J Oral Rehabil 1988, 15(6):615-624.
11. Farah J.W., Craig R.G., Meroueh K.A. Finite element analysis of three- and four-unit bridges. J Oral Rehabil 1989, 16(6):603-611.
12. Knox J., Jones M., Hubsch P., Middleton J., Kralj B. An evaluation of the stresses generated in a bonded orthodontic attachment by three different load cases using the finite element method of stress analysis. J Orthod 2000, 27(1):39-46.
13. Srirekha A., Bashetty K. Infinite to finite: an overview of finite element analysis. Indian J Dent Res 2010, 21(3):425-432.
14. Tajima K., Chen K.K., Takahashi N., Noda N., Nagamatsu Y., Kakigawa H. Three-dimensional finite element modeling from CT images of tooth and its validation. Dent Mater J 2009, 28(2):219-226.
15. Kato A., Ohno N. Construction of three-dimensional tooth model by micro-computed tomography and application for data sharing. Clin Oral Investig 2009, 13(1):43-46.
16. Nagasawa S., Yoshida T., Tamura K., Yamazoe M., Hayano K., Arai Y., et al. Construction of database for three-dimensional human tooth models and its ability for education and research-carious tooth models. Dent Mater J 2010, 29(2):132-137.