The influence of urban physical form on trip generation, evidence from metropolitan Shiraz, Iran

Indian Journal of Science and Technology

Volumn 4, Issue 9, 2011, Pages 1168-1174

  Soltani, Ali ^a   Esmaeili Ivaki, Yousef ^a  

^a SHIRAZ UNIVERSITY   (Iran)

Author keywords

Iran; Metropolitan shiraz; Trip generation; Urban planning; Urban transport

Indexed keywords

EID: 84893814731     PISSN: 09746846     EISSN: 09745645     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.17485/ijst/2011/v4i9.24     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Al-Taei AK and Taher MA (2006) Trip Attraction Development Statistical Model in Dohuk City Residential Area, Al-Rafidain Engineering, 14(2),12-23.
2. Arabani M and Amani B (2007) Evaluating the parameters affecting urban trip-generation. Iranian J. Sci. & Technol. Transact. B, Engg. 31(B5), 547-560.
3. Banister D (2007) Land use, planning and infrastructure issues in transport. Commissioned paper for the Shadow Committee on Climate Change, Dec 2007 Transport Studies Unit Oxford University Centre for the Environment.
4. Badoe D and Miller E (2000) Transportation-land use interaction: empirical findings in North America, and their implications for modeling. Transport. Res. Part D5 (4), 235-263.
5. Ben-Edigbe J and Rahman R (2010) Multivariate school travel demand regression based on trip attractions. World Acad. Sci. Engg. Technol. 66,1695-1699. www.waset.org/journals/waset/v66/v66-263.pdf.
6. Boarnet M and Crane R (2001) Travel by design: The influence of urban form on travel. Oxford Univ.
7. Cervero R (2002) Built environments and mode choice: toward a normative framework. Transport. Res. Part D (7), 265-284.
8. Cervero R and Duncan M (2006) Which reduces vehicle travel more: jobs-housing Balance or retailhousing mixing? J. Am. Planning Asso. 72 (4), 475-488.
9. Crane R (2000) The influence of urban form on travel: an interpretative review. J. Plan. Edu. & Res. 15 (1), 3-23.
10. Curtis C and Perkins T (2006) Travel behavior: a review of recent literature. In: Working Paper no 3., Department of Urban and Regional Planning, Curtin University, Perth. http://urbanet.curtin.edu.au/local/pdf/ ARC_TOD_ Working_Paper_3.pdf.
11. Douglas AA (1973) Home-based trip end models-a comparison between category analysis and regression analysis procedures. Transport. 14, 253-270.
12. Ewing R Deanna M and Li SC (1996) Land use impacts on trip generation rates. Transport. Res. Record. 1518, 1-6.
13. Fadare SO (2010) Urban form and households' travel behavior: implications for Nigeria. Oauife Univ. Press, www.oauife.edu.ng/inaugural/fadare.pdf
14. Fadare SO (1989) Analysis of factors affecting household trip generation in residential areas, Ibadan. Ife Res. Publ. in Geography. 5, 34-48.
15. FHA (1975) Trip generation analysis. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington D.C. http://www.otdmug.org/ media/ 3445/chapter4.pdf.
16. Giuliano G and KA Small (1993) Is the journey to work explained by urban structure? Urban Studies. 30, 1485-1500.
17. Greenwald, Michael J (2006) The relationship between land use and trip internalization behaviors: Evidence and Implications. In: TRB 2006 Annual Meeting, CD-ROM.
18. Handy S (1996) Understanding the link between urban form and non work travel behavior. J. Planning Edu. Res. 15, 183-198.
19. ICB (Iran Census Bureau) (2006). Center of National Statistics. Databank of Fars Province.
20. ITE (2001). The Institute of Transportation Engineers' Trip Generation Handbook. http://www.ite.org/tripgen/ Trip_Generation_Data_Form.pdf.
21. Kitamura R and Mokhtarian PL (1997) A microanalysis of land use and travel in five neighbourhoods Vo. 4 No. 9 (Sep 2011) in the San Francisco Bay Area. Transport. 24, 125-158.
22. Krizek KJ (2003) Operationalizing neighbourhood accessibility for land use-travel behaviour research and regional modeling. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Minneapolis, Minneapolis.
23. Lin JJ and Yang AT (2009) Structural analysis of how urban form impacts travel demand: Evidence from Taipei. J. Urban Studies. 46,1951-1958.
24. Maat K, Wee B and Stead D (2005) Land use and travel behaviour: expected effects from the perspective of utility theory and activity-based theories. Environ. & Planning B: Planning & Design. 32(1), 33-46. www.envplan.com/abstract.cgi?id=b31106.
25. Miller E and Soberman R (2003) Travel demand and urban form. In: Smart growth issue papers. www.rethinkgreen.ca.
26. Morrison DF (1990) Multivariate statistical methods. McGraw-Hill, NY.
27. Oyedepo OJ and Makinde OO (2009) Regression model of household trip generation of Ado-Ekiti township in Nigeria. Eur. J. Sci. Res. 28 (1),132-140. http://www.eurojournals.com/ejsr.htm.
28. Popoola KO and Faborode TG (2009) Status on household all purpose travel pattern of men and women in Ibadan. Dept. of Urban & Regional Planning, Obafemi Awolowo Univ. www.nai.uu.se/ecas-4/panels/61/Popoola-and-Faborode-Full-paper.pdf.
29. Soltani A Celik HM and Esmaeili Y (2011) An investigation of the social equity of public bus service distribution: a case study of Shiraz metropolitan area. Cities J. (communicated).
30. Stead D and Marshall S (2001) The relationships between urban form and travel patterns. An international review and evaluation. EJTIR. 1(2), 113-141.
31. TRB (Transport Research Board) (2011). Trip generation definition. Washington, D.C. http://www.TRB.org.
32. TRICS (2011). Trip generation and land use categories. http://www.trics.org/tricssystem.html.
33. Williams K (2000) Does intensifying cities make them more sustainable? In: Achieving sustainable urban form. Williams K, Burton E & Jenks M (Eds.), E & F Spon, London.