Washback effects from a high-stakes examination on out-of-class English learning: Insights from possible self theories

Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice

Volumn 21, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 71-89

  Zhan, Ying ^a   Andrews, Stephen ^b  

^a GUANGDONG UNIVERSITY OF FOREIGN STUDIES   (China)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

Chinese non English major undergraduates; College English Test Band 4 (CET 4); out of class learning; washback

Indexed keywords

EID: 84893768082     PISSN: 0969594X     EISSN: 1465329X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0969594X.2012.757546     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Alderson, J. C., & Wall, D. (1993). Does washback exist? Applied Linguistics, 14, 115-129.
2. Andrews, S. (1995). Washback or washout? The relationship between examination reform and curriculum innovation. In D. Nunan, V. Berry, & R. Berry (Eds.), Bringing about change in language education (pp. 67-81). Hong Kong: University of Hong Kong.
3. Bailey, K. M. (1996). Working for washback: A review of the washback concept in language testing. Language Testing, 13, 257-279.
4. Brown, G. (1997). Assessing student learning in higher education. London: Routledge.
5. Cheng, L. Y. (1998). Impact of a public English examination change on students' perceptions and attitudes toward their English learning. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 24, 279-301.
6. Cheng, L. Y. (2008). The key to success; English language testing in China. Language Testing, 25, 15-37.
7. Cheng, L. Y., Andrews, S., & Yu, Y. (2011). Impact and consequences of school-based assessment (SBA): Students' and parents' views of SBA in Hong Kong. Language Testing, 28, 221-249.
8. Cohen, A. (1998). Strategies in learning and using a second language. New York, NY: Addison Wesley Longman.
9. Cross, S., & Markus, H. (1994). Self-schemas, possible selves, and competent performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 423-438.
10. Dörnyei, Z. (2005a). The psychology of the language learner: Individual differences in second language acquisition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
11. Dörnyei, Z. (2005b). Teaching and researching motivation. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.
12. Dörnyei, Z. (2009). The L2 motivational self system. In Z. Dörnyei, & E. Ushioda (Eds.), Motivation, language identity and the L2 self (pp. 9-42). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
13. Ellis, R., & Barkhuizen, B. (2005). Analysing learner language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
14. Ferman, I. (2004). The washback of an EFL national oral matriculation test to teaching and learning. In L. Y. Cheng, Y. Watanabe, & A. Curtis (Eds.), Washback in language testing: Research contents and methods (pp. 190-210). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
15. Gardner, R. C., & Lambert, W. E. (1959). Motivational variables in second language acquisition. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 13, 266-272.
16. Gosa, C. M. C. (2004). Investigating washback: A case study using student diaries (Unpublished PhD dissertation). Lancaster University, Lancaster.
17. Green, A. (2007a). Washback to learning outcomes: A comparative study of IELTS preparation and university pre-sessional language courses. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 14, 75-97.
18. Green, A. (2007b). IELTS washback in context: Preparation for academic writing in higher education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
19. Gu, X. D. (2005). Positive or negative? An empirical study of CET washback on College English teaching and learning in China (Unpublished doctoral thesis). Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
20. Hamp-Lyons, L. (1997). Washback, impact and validity: Ethical concerns. Language Testing, 14, 295-303.
21. Han, B., Dai, M., & Yang, L. (2004). Problems with College English Test as emerged from a survey. Foreign Language Teaching and Research, 35, 352-358.
22. Higgins, E. T. (1987). Self-discrepancy: A theory relating self and affect. Psychological Review, 94, 319-340.
23. Higgins, E. T. (1996). The 'self-digest': Self-knowledge serving self-regulatory functions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 1062-1083.
24. Higgins, E. T. (1998). Promotion and prevention: Regulatory focus as a motivational principle. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 1-46). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
25. Jin, Y. (2006). Improvement of test validity and test washback - the impact study of the College English Test Band 4 and 6. Foreign Language World, 6, 65-73.
26. Jin, Y., & Yang, H. Z. (2006). The English proficiency of college and university students in China: As reflected in the CET. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 19, 21-36.
27. Jing, S. H. (1999). The causes of low effectiveness in college English teaching. Foreign Language Teaching and Research, 1, 21-23.
28. Kang, Y., & Chen, J. (2005). Testing the test: Aspects of CET revisited. Teaching English in China, 28, 21-35.
29. Markus, H. (2006). Forward. In C. Dunkel & J. Kerpelman (Eds.), Possible selves: Theory, research and applications (pp. xi-xiv). New York, NY: Nova Science.
30. Markus, H., & Nurius, P. (1986). Possible selves. American Psychologist, 41, 954-969.
31. Markus, H., & Ruvolo, A. (1989). Possible selves: Personalized representations of goals. In L. A. Pervin (Ed.), Goal concepts in personality and social psychology (pp. 211-241). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
32. Messick, S. (1996). Validity and washback in language testing. Language Testing, 13, 241-256.
33. Mickan, P., & Motteram, J. (2009). The preparation practices of IELTS candidates: Case studies. IELTS Research Report, 10, 223-262.
34. Niu, Q. (2001). The problems in the current college English assessment system. Foreign Language Teaching and Research, 33, 140-143.
35. Shih, C. (2007). A new washback model of students' learning. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 64, 135-162.
36. Shohamy, E., Donitsa-Schmidt, S., & Ferman, I. (1996). Test impact revisited: Washback effect over time. Language Testing, 13, 298-317.
37. Stoneman, B. W. (2006). The impact of an exit English test on Hong Kong undergraduates: A study investigating the effects of test status on students' test preparation behaviors (Unpublished PhD thesis). The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong.
38. Tsagari, D. (2009). The complexity of test washback. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
39. Watanabe, Y. (2006). The importance of motivation theories for understanding washback to the learner. Bulletin of the Center for Educational Research and Practice, Faculty of Education and Human Studies, Akita University, 28, 1-6.
40. Williams, M., & Burden, R. L. (1997). Psychology for language teachers: A social constructivist approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
41. Yang, H. Z. (2003). The 15 years of the CET and its impact on teaching. Journal of Foreign Languages, 3, 21-29.
42. Yu, W. S. (2005). The survey to the students on the new CET reform. Chinese College Education, 7, 43-47.