ZIBgridfree: Efficient conformational analysis by partition-of-unity coupling

Journal of Mathematical Chemistry

Volumn 52, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 781-804

  Bujotzek, Alexander ^a   Schütt, Ole ^a   Nielsen, Adam ^a   Fackeldey, Konstantin ^a   Weber, Marcus ^a  

^a ZUSE INSTITUTE BERLIN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Conformational analysis; Meshfree methods; Molecular simulation

Indexed keywords

EID: 84893756524     PISSN: 02599791     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10910-013-0265-1     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. G. Torrie, J. Valleau, Nonphysical sampling distributions in Monte Carlo free-energy estimation: umbrella sampling. J. Comput. Phys. 23, 187-199 (1977).
2. A. Amadei, A. Linssen, H. Berendsen, Essential dynamics of proteins. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet. 17, 412-425 (1993).
3. Y. Sugita, Y. Okamoto, Replica-exchange molecular dynamics method for protein folding. Chem. Phys. Lett. 314, 141-151 (1999).
4. M. Bonomi, D. Branduardi, G. Bussi, C. Camilloni, D. Provasi, P. Raiteri, D. Donadio, F. Marinelli, F. Pietrucci, R. Broglia, M. Parrinello, PLUMED: a portable plugin for free energy calculations with molecular dynamics. Comput. Phys. Comm. 180, 1961-1972 (2009).
5. M. Weber, H. Meyer, ZIBgridfree-Adaptive Conformation Analysis with Qualified Support of Transition States and Thermodynamic Weights (2005).
6. P. Deuflhard, in Trends in Nonlinear Analysis, eds. by M. Kirkilionis, S. Krömker, R. Rannacher, F. Tomi (Springer, Berlin, 2003), pp. 269-288.
7. S. Kube, M. Weber, A coarse graining method for the identification of transition rates between molecular conformations. J. Chem. Phys. 126, 024103 (2007).
8. M. Sarich, F. Noe, C. Schuette, On the approximation quality of Markov state model. Multiscale Model. Simul. 8, 1154-1177 (2010).
9. K. Fackeldey, A. Bujotzek, M. Weber, A meshless discretization method for Markov state models applied to explicit water peptide folding simulations, in Lecture Notes in Computational Science and Engineering, vol. 89 (Springer, 2012), pp. 141-154.
10. J. Prinz, J. Chodera, V. Pande, W. Swope, J. C. Smith, Noe F., Optimal use of data in parallel tempering simulations for the construction of discrete-state Markov models of biomolecular dynamicsReplica-exchange molecular dynamics method for protein folding. J Chem Phys. 134, 244108 (2011).
11. M. Weber, Meshless Methods in Conformation Dynamics. Doctoral thesis, Freie Universität Berlin, Department of Mathematics and Computer Science (2006).
12. B. de Groot, D. van Aalten, R. Scheek, A. Amadei, G. Vriend, H. Berendsen, Prediction of protein conformational freedom from distance constraints. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet. 29, 240-251 (1997).
13. D. Shepard, A two-dimensional interpolation function for irregularly-spaced data, in Proceedings of 23rd ACM National Conference (1968), pp. 517-524.
14. B. Hess, C. Kutzner, D. van der Spoel, E. Lindahl, GROMACS 4: algorithms for highly efficient, load-balanced, and scalable molecular simulation. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 4, 435-447 (2008).
15. A. Gelman, D. Rubin, Inference from iterative simulation using multiple sequences. Stat. Sci. 7, 457-472 (1992).
16. M. Klimm, A. Bujotzek, M. Weber, Direct reweighting strategies in conformation dynamics. MATCH Commun. Math. Comput. Chem. 65, 333-346 (2011).
17. S. Kumar, J. M. Rosenberg, D. Bouzida, R. H. Swendsen, P. A. Kollman, Multidimensional free-energy calculations using the weighted histogram analysis method. J. Comput. Chem. 16, 1339-1350 (1995).
18. B. Roux, The calculation of the potential of mean force using computer simulations. Comput. Phys. Commun. 91, 275-282 (1995).
19. M. Weber, S. Kube, L. Walter, P. Deuflhard, Stable computation of probability densities for metastable dynamical systems. Multiscale Model. Simul. 6, 396-416 (2007).
20. R. Sinkhorn, A relationship between arbitrary positive matrices and doubly stochastic matrices. Ann. Math. Stat. 35, 876-879 (1964).
21. P. Deuflhard, M. Weber, Robust Perron cluster analysis in conformation dynamics. Linear Algebra Appl. 398, 161-184 (2005).
22. M. Weber, S. Kube, Robust Perron cluster analysis for various applications in computational life science, in Computational Life Sciences: First International Symposium, CompLife 2005, ed. by M. R. Berthold et al. (Springer, Heidelberg, 2005), pp. 57-66.
23. V. Hornak, R. Abel, A. Okur, B. Strockbine, A. Roitberg, C. Simmerling, Comparison of multiple Amber force fields and development of improved protein backbone parameters. Proteins: Struct.: Funct. Bioinf. 65, 712-725 (2006).
24. A. da Silva, W. Vranken, ACPYPE-AnteChamber PYthon Parser interfacE. BMC Res. Notes 5, 367 (2012).
25. J. Wang, R. Wolf, J. Caldwell, P. Kollman, D. Case, Development and testing of a general Amber force field. J. Comput. Chem. 25, 1157-1174 (2004).
26. J. Wang, W. Wang, P. Kollman, D. Case, Automatic atom type and bond type perception in molecular mechanical calculations. J. Mol. Graph. Model. 25, 247-260 (2006).
27. D. Case, T. Cheatham III, T. Darden, H. Gohlke, R. Luo, K. Merz Jr, A. Onufriev, C. Simmerling, B. Wang, R. Woods, The Amber biomolecular simulation programs. J. Comput. Chem. 26, 1668-1688 (2005).
28. A. Jakalian, B. Bush, D. Jack, C. Bayly, Fast, efficient generation of high-quality atomic charges. AM1-BCC model: I. Method. J. Comput. Chem. 21, 132-146 (2000).
29. A. Jakalian, D. Jack, C. Bayly, Fast, efficient generation of high-quality atomic charges. AM1-BCC model: II. Parameterization and validation. J. Comput. Chem. 23, 1623-1641 (2002).
30. H. W. Horn, W. C. Swope, J. W. Pitera, J. D. Madura, T. J. Dick, G. L. Hura, T. Head-Gordon, Development of an improved four-site water model for biomolecular simulations: TIP4P-Ew. J. Chem. Phys. 120, 9665-9678 (2004).
31. H. Horn, W. Swope, J. Pitera, Characterization of the TIP4P-Ew water model: vapor pressure and boiling point. J. Chem. Phys. 123, 194504 (2005).
32. C. Caleman, P. van Maaren, M. Hong, J. Hub, L. Costa, D. van der Spoel, Force field benchmark of organic liquids: density, enthalpy of vaporization, heat capacities, surface tension, isothermal compressibility, volumetric expansion coefficient, and dielectric constant. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 8, 61-74 (2011).
33. D. van der Spoel, P. van Maaren, C. Caleman, GROMACS molecule & liquid database. Bioinformatics 28, 752-753 (2012).
34. U. Essmann, L. Perera, M. Berkowitz, T. Darden, H. Lee, L. Pedersen, A smooth particle mesh Ewald method. J. Chem. Phys. 103, 8577 (1995).
35. G. Bussi, D. Donadio, M. Parrinello, Canonical sampling through velocity rescaling. J. Chem. Phys. 126, 014101 (2007).
36. W. van Gunsteren, H. Berendsen, A leap-frog algorithm for stochastic dynamics. Mol. Simul. 1, 173-185 (1988).
37. M. Parrinello, A. Rahman, Polymorphic transitions in single crystals: a new molecular dynamics method. J. Appl. Phys. 52, 7182-7190 (1981).
38. S. Nose, M. Klein, Constant pressure molecular dynamics for molecular systems. Mol. Phys. 50, 1055-1076 (1983).
39. C. Schütte, Conformational Dynamics: Modelling, Theory, Algorithm and Application to Biomolecules. Habilitation thesis, Freie Universität Berlin, Department of Mathematics and Computer Science (1999).
40. T. Halgren, Merck molecular force field: I-V. J. Comput. Chem. 17, 490-641 (1996).
41. J. Chodera, W. Swope, J. Pitera, K. Dill, Long-time protein folding dynamics from short-time molecular dynamics simulations. Multiscale Model. Simul. 5, 1214 (2006).
42. L. von Krbek, Multivalente Krone-Ammonium-Komplexe (Freie Universität Berlin, Fachbereich Chemie, Biologie, Pharmazie, Master's thesis, 2012).
43. M. Weber, A Subspace Approach to Molecular Markov State Models via a New Infinitesimal Generator. Habilitation thesis, Freie Universität Berlin, 2011; Department of Mathematics and Computer Science. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs. acs. org.