Design of experiments applications in bioprocessing: Concepts and approach

Biotechnology Progress

Volumn 30, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 86-99

  Kumar, Vijesh ^a   Bhalla, Akriti ^a   Rathore, Anurag S ^a  

^a INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY DELHI   (India)

Author keywords

Bioprocessing; Box Behnken; Central composite; D optimal; Design of experiments; I optimal; Plackett Burman

Indexed keywords

BIOPROCESSING; BOX-BEHNKEN; CENTRAL COMPOSITE; D-OPTIMAL; I-OPTIMAL; PLACKETT-BURMAN;

OPTIMAL SYSTEMS; OPTIMIZATION; STATISTICAL TESTS;

DESIGN OF EXPERIMENTS;

ARTICLE; BIOPROCESSING; BIOREACTOR; BIOTECHNOLOGY; BOX-BEHNKEN; CENTRAL COMPOSITE; D-OPTIMAL; DESIGN OF EXPERIMENTS; I-OPTIMAL; METHODOLOGY; PLACKETT-BURMAN; STANDARD; STATISTICAL MODEL;

BIOPROCESSING; BOX-BEHNKEN; CENTRAL COMPOSITE; D-OPTIMAL; DESIGN OF EXPERIMENTS; I-OPTIMAL; PLACKETT-BURMAN;

BIOREACTORS; BIOTECHNOLOGY; MODELS, STATISTICAL; RESEARCH DESIGN;

EID: 84893737131     PISSN: 87567938     EISSN: 15206033     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/btpr.1821     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Montgomery DC. Design and Analysis of Experiments. Wiley; New York, 2008.
2. Box GEP, Hunter JS, Hunter WG. Statistics for Experimenters: Design, Innovation, and Discovery, Vol. 13. Wiley; New York, 2005.
3. Plackett RL, Burman JP. The design of optimum multifactorial experiments. Biometrika. 1946;33(4):305-325.
4. Persad A, Chopda V, Rathore A, Gomes J. Comparative performance of decoupled input-output linearizing controller and linear interpolation PID controller: enhancing biomass and ethanol production in saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2013;169(4):1219-1240.
5. Box GEP, Meyer RD. An analysis for unreplicated fractional factorials. Technometrics. 1986;28(1):11-18.
6. Dejaegher B, Vander Heyden Y. The use of experimental design in separation science. Acta Chromatogr. 2009;21(2):161-201.
7. Boyle DM, Buckley JJ, Johnson GV, Rathore A, Gustafson ME. Use of the design-of-experiments approach for the development of a refolding technology for progenipoietin-1, a recombinant human cytokine fusion protein from Escherichia coli inclusion bodies. Biotechnol Appl Biochem. 2009;54(2):85-92.
8. van Hoek P, Harms J, Wang X, Rathore AS. Case study on definition of process design space for a microbial fermentation step. In: Rathore AS, Mhatre R, editor. Quality by Design for Biopharmaceuticals: Principles and Case Studies. New Jersey: Wiley Interscience; 2009:85-109.
9. Booth KHV, Cox D. Some systematic supersaturated designs. Technometrics. 962;4(4):489-495.
10. Box GEP, Wilson K. On the experimental attainment of optimum conditions. J R Stat Soc Series B Stat Methodol. 1951;13(1):1-45.
11. Myers RH, Montgomery DC, Anderson-Cook CM. Response Surface Methodology: Process and Product Optimization using Designed Experiments, Vol. 705. New Jersey: Wiley; 2009.
12. Ferreira SLC, Bruns RE, da Silva EGP, dos Santos WNL, Quintella CM, David JM, de Andrade JB, Breitkreitz MC, Jardim ICSF, Neto BB. Statistical designs and response surface techniques for the optimization of chromatographic systems. J Chromatogr A. 2007;1158(1):2-14.
13. Box GEP, Behnken D. Some new three level designs for the study of quantitative variables. Technometrics. 1960;2(4):455-475.
14. Box GEP, Draper NR. A basis for the selection of a response surface design. J Am Stat Assoc. 1959;54(287):622-654.
15. Box GEP. The exploration and exploitation of response surfaces: some general considerations and examples. Biometrics. 1954;10(1):16-60.
16. Baş D, Boyaci IH. Modeling and optimization I: usability of response surface methodology. J Food Eng. 2007;78(3):836-845.
17. Rathore A, Sharma C, Persad AA. Use of computational fluid dynamics as a tool for establishing process design space for mixing in a bioreactor. Biotechnol Prog. 2012;28(2):382-391.
18. Bade PD, Kotu SP, Rathore AS. Optimization of a refolding step for a therapeutic fusion protein in the quality by design (QbD) paradigm. J Sep Sci. 2012;35:3160-3169.
19. Silvey SD, Silvey SD. Optimal Design: An Introduction to the Theory for Parameter Estimation. London: Chapman and Hall; 1980.
20. Pukelsheim F. Optimal Design of Experiments, Vol. 50. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics; Philadelphia, 2006.
21. de Aguiar PF, Bourguignon B, Khots M, Massart D, Phan-Than-Luu R. D-optimal designs. Chemometr Intell Lab Syst. 1995;30(2):199-210.
22. Lee CMS. Constrained optimal designs. J Stat Plan Inference. 1988;18(3):377-389.
23. Hibbert DB. Experimental design in chromatography: a tutorial review. J Chromatogr B. 2012;910:2-13.
24. Mandenius CF, Brundin A. Bioprocess optimization using design-of-experiments methodology. Biotechnol Prog. 2008;24(6):1191-1203.
25. Kalil S, Maugeri F, Rodrigues M. Response surface analysis and simulation as a tool for bioprocess design and optimization. Process Biochem. 2000;35(6):539-550.
26. Janson JC, Hedman P. On the optimization of process chromatography of proteins. Biotechnol Prog. 2008;3(1):9-13.
27. Rathore AS, Mhatre R. Quality by Design for Biopharmaceuticals: Principles and Case Studies. New Jersey: Wiley-Interscience; 2011.
28. Harms J, Wang X, Kim T, Yang X, Rathore AS. Defining process design space for biotech products: case study of Pichia pastoris fermentation. Biotechnol Prog. 2008;24(3);655-662.
29. Rathore AS, Bhambure R, Krull IS. High-throughput tools and approaches for development of process chromatography steps. LC GC N Am 2011;29:252.
30. Bhambure R, Rathore A. Chromatography process development in the quality by design paradigm I: establishing a high-throughput process development platform as a tool for estimating "characterization space" for an ion exchange chromatography step. Biotechnol Prog. 2013;29:403-414.
31. Muthukumar S, Rathore AS. High throughput process development (HTPD) platform for membrane chromatography. J Membr Sci. 2013;442:245-253.
32. Cook RD, Nachtrheim CJ. A comparison of algorithms for constructing exact D-optimal designs. Technometrics. 1980;22(3):315-324.
33. Meyer RK, Nachtsheim CJ. The coordinate-exchange algorithm for constructing exact optimal experimental designs. Technometrics. 1995;37(1):60-69.
34. Atkinson AC, Donev AN, Tobias RD. Optimum Experimental Designs, with SAS. New York: Oxford University Press; 2007.
35. Burnham KP, Anderson DR. Multimodel inference understanding AIC and BIC in model selection. Sociol Methods Res. 2004;33(2):261-304.
36. Montgomery DC, Borror CM, Stanley JD. Some cautions in the use of Plackett-Burman designs. Qual Eng. 1997;10(2):371-381.
37. Akaike H. Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. Springer Series in Statistics. Springer, New York, 1992, 610-624.
38. Hurvich CM, Tsai CL. Regression and time series model selection in small samples. Biometrika. 1989;76(2):297-307.
39. Sugiura N. Further analysts of the data by akaike's information criterion and the finite corrections: further analysts of the data by akaike's. Commun Stat Theory Methods. 1978;7(1):13-26.
40. Schwarz G. Estimating the dimension of a model. Ann Stat. 1978;6(2):461-464.
41. Neter J, Wasserman W, Kutner MH. Applied Linear Statistical Models, Vol. 4. Chicago:Irwin; 1996.