Maternal hemodynamics by thoracic impedance cardiography for normal pregnancy and the postpartum period

Obstetrics and Gynecology

Volumn 123, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 318-324

  Morris, Rachael ^a   Sunesara, Imran ^a   Rush, Laura ^a   Anderson, Belinda ^a   Blake, Pamela G ^a   Darby, Marie ^a   Sawardecker, Sandip ^a   Novotny, Sarah ^a   Bofill, James A ^a   Martin, James N ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AFRICAN AMERICAN; ARTICLE; CESAREAN SECTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; GESTATIONAL AGE; HEART HEMODYNAMICS; HUMAN; IMPEDANCE CARDIOGRAPHY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MEAN ARTERIAL PRESSURE; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; PREGNANCY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PUERPERIUM; SECOND TRIMESTER PREGNANCY; SYSTEMIC VASCULAR RESISTANCE; VAGINAL DELIVERY; YOUNG ADULT; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; DELIVERY; HEMODYNAMICS; REFERENCE VALUE; THORAX; VASCULAR RESISTANCE;

ADULT; CARDIOGRAPHY, IMPEDANCE; CESAREAN SECTION; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; DELIVERY, OBSTETRIC; FEMALE; GESTATIONAL AGE; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMANS; POSTPARTUM PERIOD; PREGNANCY; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; REFERENCE VALUES; THORAX; VASCULAR RESISTANCE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84893729903     PISSN: 00297844     EISSN: 1873233X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000104     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Carlin A, Alfirevic Z. Time to re-visit the role of haemodynamic monitoring in obstetrics? BJOG 2006;113:989-91.
2. Easterling TF, Benedetti TJ, Schmucker BC, Millard SP. Maternal hemodynamics in normal and preeclamptic pregnancies; a longitudinal study. Obstet Gynecol 1990;76:1061-9.
3. Scardo JA, Hogg BB, Newman RB. Favorable hemodynamic effects of magnesium sulfate in preeclampsia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995;173:1249-53.
4. Newman RB, Pierre H, Scardo JA. Thoracic-fluid conductivity in peripartum women with pulmonary edema. Obstet Gynecol 1999;94:48-51.
5. Young P, Johanson R. Haemodynamic, invasive and echocardiographic monitoring in the hypertensive parturient. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2001;15:605-22.
6. Ventura HO, Taler SJ, Strobeck JE. Hypertension as a hemodynamic disease: The role of impedance cardiography in diagnostic, prognostic and therapeutic decision making. Am J Hypertens 2005;18:26S-43S.
7. Carr DB, Tran LT, Brateng DA, Kawamura C, Shofer JB, Karumanchi SA, et al. Hemodynamically-directed atenolol therapy is associated with a blunted rise in maternal sFLT-1 levels during pregnancy. Hypertens Pregnancy 2009;28:42-55.
8. Chaffin DG, Webb DG. Outcomes of pregnancies at risk for hypertensive complications managed using impedance cardiography. Am J Perinatol 2009;26:717-21.
9. Smith RD, Levy P, Ferrario CM; Consideration of Noninvasive Hemodynamic Monitoring to Target Reduction of Blood Pressure Levels Study Group. Value of noninvasive hemodynamics to achieve blood pressure control in hypertensive subjects. Hypertension 2006;47:771-7.
10. Parrish MR, Laye MR, Wood T, Keiser SD, Owens MY, May WL, et al. Impedance cardiography facilitates differentiation of severe and superimposed preeclampsia from other hypertensive disorders. Hypertens Pregnancy 2012;31:327-40.
11. Flo K, Wilsgaard T, Vartun A, Acharya G. A longitudinal study of the relationship between maternal cardiac output measured by impedance cardiography and uterine artery blood flow in the second half of pregnancy. BJOG 2010;117:837-44.
12. van Oppen AC, van der Tweel I, Alsbach GP, Heethaar RM, Bruinse HW. A longitudinal study of maternal hemodynamics during normal pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 1996;88:40-6.
13. Burlingame J, Ohana P, Aaronoff M, Seto T. Noninvasive cardiac monitoring in pregnancy: Impedance cardiography versus echocardiography. J Perinatol 2013;33:675-80.
14. Tihtonen KM, Kööbi T, Uotila JT. Arterial stiffness in preeclamptic and chronic hypertensive pregnancies. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2006;128:180-6.
15. Tithonen KM, Kööbi T, Vuolteenaho O, Huhtala HS, Uotila JT. Natriuretic peptides and hemodynamics in preeclampsia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007;196:328.e1-7.
16. Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)-a meta data-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform 2009;42:377-81.
17. Easterling TR, Carr DB, Brateng D, Diederichs C, Schmucker B. Treatment of hypertension in pregnancy: Effect of atenolol on maternal disease, preterm delivery, and fetal growth. Obstet Gynecol 2001;98:427-33.
18. Nyboer J. Electrical impedance plethymography. In: Medical physics. Vol 1. Chicago (IL): Year Book Publishers; 1944. p.744.
19. Kööbi T, Kaukinen S, Ahola T, Turjanmaa VM. Non-invasive measurement of cardiac output: Whole body impedance cardiography in simultaneous comparison with thermodilution and direct oxygen Fick methods. Intensive Care Med 1997;23: 1132-7.
20. Clark SL, Southwick J, Pivarnik JM, Cotton DB, Hankins GDV, Phelan JP. A comparison of cardiac index in normal term pregnancy using thoracic electrical impedance and oxygen extraction (Fick) techniques. Obstet Gynecol 1994;83: 669-72.
21. Kööbi T, Kahonen M, Iivainen T, Turjanmaa V. Simultaneous non-invasive assessment of arterial stiffness and haemodynamics-a validation study. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging 2003;23:31-6.
22. Scardo JA, Ellings J, Vermillion ST, Chauhan SP. Validation of bioimpedance estimates of cardiac output in preeclampsia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000;183:911-3.
23. Tomsin K, Mesens T, Molenberghs G, Gyselaers W. Impedance cardiography in uncomplicated pregnancy and preeclampsia: A reliability study. J Obstet Gynaecol 2012;32:630-4.
24. Raaijmakers E, Faes TJ, Scholten RJ, Goovaerts HG, Heethaar RM. A meta-analysis of published studies concerning the validity of thoracic impedance cardiography. Ann NY Acad Sci 1999;873:121-7.
25. Moertl MG, Schlembach D, Papousek I, Hinghofer-Szalkay H, Weiss EM, Lang U, et al. Hemodynamic evaluation in pregnancy: Limitations of impedance cardiography. Physiol Meas 2012;33:1015-26.
26. Moshkovitz Y, Kaluski E, Milo O, Vered Z, Cotter G. Recent developments in cardiac output determination by bioimpedance: Comparison with invasive cardiac output and potential cardiovascular applications. Curr Opin Cardiol 2004;19:229-37.
27. Cotter G, Schachner A, Sasson L, Dekel H, Moshkovitz Y. Impedance cardiography revisited. Physiol Meas 2006;27: 817-27.
28. Van de Water JM, Miller TW, Vogel RL, Mount BE, Dalton ML. Impedance cardiography: The next vital sign technology? Chest 2003;123:2028-33.
29. Paredes OL, Shite J, Shinke T, Watanabe S, Otake H, Matsumoto D, et al. Impedance cardiography for cardiac output estimation: Reliability of wrist-to-ankle electrode configuration. Circ J 2006;70:1164-8.
30. Tihtonen K, Kööbi T, Yli-Hankala A, Huhtala H, Uotila J. Maternal haemodynamics in preeclampsia compared with normal pregnancy during cesarean delivery. BJOG 2006;113:657-63.
31. Dyer RA, Reed AR, van Dyk D, Arcache MJ, Hodges O, Lombard CJ, et al. Hemodynamic effects of ephedrine, phenylephedrine, and the coadministration of phenylephrine with oxytocin during spinal anesthesia for elective cesarean delivery. Anesthesiology 2009;111:753-65.
32. Mandell GL, Jamnback I, Ramanathan S. Hemodynamic effects of subarachnoid fentanyl in laboring parturients. Reg Anesth 1996;21:103-11.
33. Park GE, Hauch MA, Curlin F, Datta S, Bader AM. The effects of varying volumes of crystalloid administration before cesarean delivery on maternal hemodynamics and colloid osmotic pressure. Anesth Analg 1996;83:299-303.
34. Gonik B, Cotton D, Spillman T, Abouleish E, Zavisca F. Peripartum colloid osmotic pressure changes: Effects of controlled fluid management. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1985;151:812-5.