Experimental investigation of modern and established carotid stents

RoFo Fortschritte auf dem Gebiet der Rontgenstrahlen und der Bildgebenden Verfahren

Volumn 186, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 157-165

  Wissgott, C ^a   Schmidt, W ^b   Behrens, P ^b   Brandt, C ^b   Schmitz, K P ^b   Andresen, R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL SCHLESWIG HOLSTEIN   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ROSTOCK   (Germany)

Author keywords

carotid arteries; experimental study; interventional procedures; stents

Indexed keywords

ARTERY DIAMETER; ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; BLOOD VESSEL WALL; CAROTID ARTERY STENT; COMPRESSIVE FORCE; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; FLEXIBILITY; FLUOROSCOPY; IN VITRO STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIAL FORCE; RIGIDITY; SELF EXPANDING STENT; WALL ADAPTATION; BLOOD VESSEL PROSTHESIS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DEVICE FAILURE ANALYSIS; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; EVALUATION STUDY; HUMAN; MECHANICAL STRESS; PRESSURE; STENT; TENSILE STRENGTH; THEORETICAL MODEL; YOUNG MODULUS;

BLOOD VESSEL PROSTHESIS; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ELASTIC MODULUS; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; EQUIPMENT FAILURE ANALYSIS; HUMANS; MODELS, THEORETICAL; PRESSURE; STENTS; STRESS, MECHANICAL; TENSILE STRENGTH;

EID: 84893692192     PISSN: 14389029     EISSN: 14389010     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1350439     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Wholey M. H., Wholey M., Mathias K. et al. Global experiences in cervical carotid artery stent placement. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv: 2000; 50 160 167 (Pubitemid 30353838)
2. Andresen R., Roth M., Brinckmann W. Ambulante primäre Stentangioplastie von symptomatischen Arteria-carotis-interna-Stenosen. Zentrabl Chir: 2003; 128 703 708 (Pubitemid 37193326)
3. ExecutiveCommittee for the Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study Endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis. JAMA: 1995; 273 1421 1428
4. Ferguson G. G., Eliasziw M., Barr H. W. et al. The North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial: surgical results in 1415 patients. Stroke: 1999; 30 1729 1737
5. Endovascular versus surgical treatment in patients with carotid stenosis in the Carotid and Vertebral Artery Transluminal Angioplasty Study (CAVATAS): a randomised trial. No authors listed Lancet: 2001; 357 1729 1737
6. Roubin G. S., New G., Iyver S. S. et al. Immediate and late clinical outcomes of carotid artery stenting in patients with symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis: a 5-year prospective analysis. Circulation: 2001; 100 532 537 (Pubitemid 32116237)
7. Wholey M. H., Al-Mubarak N., Wholey M. H. Updated review of the global carotid artery stent registry. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv: 2003; 60 259 266 (Pubitemid 37204008)
8. Carnelli D., Pennati G., Villa T. et al. Mechanical properties of open-cell, self expandable shape memory alloy carotid stents. Artif Organs: 2011; 35 74 80
9. Nikas D. N., Kompara G., Reimers B. Carotid stents: which is the best option? J Cardiovasc Surg: 2011; 52 779 793
10. Müller-Hülsbeck S., Schäfer P. J., Charalambous N. et al. Comparison of Carotid Stents: An In-Vitro Experiment Focusing on Stent Design. J Endovasc Ther: 2009; 16 168 177
11. Wissgott C., Schmidt W., Behrens P. et al. Vergleich mechanischer Eigenschaften von selbst expandierenden peripheren Stents. Fortschr Röntgenstr: 2009; 181 579 586
12. Schmidt W., Wissgott C., Behrens P. et al. Performance characteristics of modern self-expanding nitinol stents indicated for SFA. Fortschr Röntgenstr: 2011; 183 818 825
13. Schmidt W., Schmitz K.-P. Devices. In: Mastering of Endovascular Techniques - A guide to excellence. (ed. P. Lanzer) Philadelphia Lippincott William & Wilkins: 2006; 114 135
14. Schmidt W., Andresen R., Behrens P. et al. Mechanische Eigenschaften peripherer Ballonexpandierbarer Stentsysteme. Fortschr. Röntgenstr: 2002; 174 1430 1437 (Pubitemid 35415269)
15. Hong M. K., Mintz G. S., Lee C. W. et al. Incidence, mechanism, predictors, and long-term prognosis of late stent malapposition after bare-metal stent implantation. Circulation: 2004; 109 881 886 (Pubitemid 38252740)
16. Duda S. H., Wiskirchen J., Tepe G. et al. Physical properties of endovascular stents: an experimental comparison. J Vasc Interv Radiol: 2000; 11 645 654 (Pubitemid 30365597)
17. Bosiers M., de Donato G., Deloose K. et al. Does free cell area influence the outcome in carotid artery stenting. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg: 2007; 33 135 141 (Pubitemid 46090499)
18. Mathias K., Jager H., Hennings S. et al. Endoluminal treatment of internal carotid artery stenosis. World J Surg: 2001; 25 328 334
19. Vitek J., Roubin G., Al-Mubarek N. et al. Carotid artery stenting: technical considerations. Am J Neuroradiol: 2000; 21 1736 1743
20. Mathur A., Dorros G., Iyer S. et al. Palmaz stent compression following carotid stenting. Cath Cardiovasc Diagn: 1997; 41 137 140 (Pubitemid 27240884)
21. ® Endoprothesis: 24 08 2011; http://www.accessdata.fda.gov
22. Ahmadi R., Willfort A., Lang W. et al. Carotid artery stenting: effect of learning curve and intermediate-term morphological outcome. J Endovasc Ther: 2001; 8 539 546 (Pubitemid 34027725)
23. Wholey M. H., Finol E. A. Designing the ideal stent. Endovasc Today: 2007; 6 25 34
24. Bosiers M., Deloose K., Verbist J. et al. What practical factors guide the choice of stent and protection device during carotid angioplasty? Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg: 2008; 35 637 643 (Pubitemid 351680163)
25. Cremonesi A., Rubino P., Grattoni C. et al. Multicenter experience with a new hybrid carotid stent. J Endovasc Ther: 2008; 15 186 192 (Pubitemid 351628571)