Erratum to Open versus robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy: A multicenter comparison study of perioperative results and complications (World J Urol, 10.1007/s00345-013-1136-x);Open versus robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy: A multicenter comparison study of perioperative results and complications

World Journal of Urology

Volumn 32, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 287-293

  Vittori, Gianni ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORENCE   (Italy)

Author keywords

Complications; Kidney tumor; Partial nephrectomy; Robotics

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; EQUIPMENT; FEMALE; HUMAN; INCIDENCE; ITALY; KIDNEY TUMOR; LENGTH OF STAY; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; MULTICENTER STUDY; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; NEPHRECTOMY; OPERATIVE BLOOD LOSS; PERIOPERATIVE PERIOD; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; ROBOTICS; STATISTICS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

AGED; BLOOD LOSS, SURGICAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; INCIDENCE; ITALY; KIDNEY NEOPLASMS; LENGTH OF STAY; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; NEPHRECTOMY; PERIOPERATIVE PERIOD; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; ROBOTICS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84893648566     PISSN: 07244983     EISSN: 14338726     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00345-013-1162-8     Document Type: Erratum

References (30)

1. Ljungberg B, Cowan NC, Hanbury DC et al. (2010) European association of urology guideline group. EAU guidelines on renal cell carcinoma: the 2010 update. Eur Urol 58(3): 398-406. Epub 2010 Jul 12. PubMed PMID: 20633979.
2. Novick AC, Campbell SC, Belldegrun A et al: Guideline for management of the clinical stage 1 renal mass. Available at www. auanet. org/content/ media/renalmass09. pdf?CFID 1666475&CFTOKEN 79651347&jsessionid 8430e85e87e2ad1bac0325294 a7325226072. Accessed 1 Aug 2010.
3. Antonelli A, Ficarra V, Bertini R et al (2012) Members of the SATURN Project-LUNA Foundation. Elective partial nephrectomy is equivalent to radical nephrectomy in patients with clinical T1 renal cell carcinoma: results of a retrospective, comparative, multi-institutional study. BJU Int 109(7): 1013-1018.
4. Huang WC, Elkin EB, Levey AS et al (2009) Partial nephrectomy versus radical nephrectomy in patients with small renal tumors-is there a difference in mortality and cardiovascular outcomes? J Urol 181(1): 55-61.
5. Miller DC, Schonlau M, Litwin MS et al (2008) Urologic diseases in America project. Renal and cardiovascular morbidity after partial or radical nephrectomy. Cancer 112(3): 511-520.
6. Khalifeh A, Autorino R, Hillyer SP et al. (2013) Comparative outcomes and assessment of "Trifecta" in 500 robotic and laparoscopic partial nephrectomies: a single surgeon experience. J Urol 189(4): 1236-1242.
7. Benway BM, Bhayani SB, Rogers CG et al (2009) Robot assisted partial nephrectomy versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for renal tumors: a multi-institutional analysis of perioperative outcomes. J Urol 182(3): 866-872.
8. Pierorazio PM, Patel HD, Feng T, et al. (2011) Robotic-assisted versus traditional laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: comparison of outcomes and evaluation of learning curve. Urology 78(4): 813-819. Epub 2011 Jul 29.
9. Simhan J, Smaldone MC, Tsai KJ et al (2012) Perioperative outcomes of robotic and open partial nephrectomy for moderately and highly complex renal lesions. J Urol 187(6): 2000-2004.
10. Sprenkle PC, Power N, Ghoneim T et al (2012) Comparison of open and minimally invasive partial nephrectomy for renal tumors 4-7 centimeters. Eur Urol 61(3): 593-599.
11. Lee S, Oh J, Hong SK, et al. (2011) Open versus robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: effect on clinical outcome. J Endourol 25(7): 1181-1185. Epub 2011 Jun 9.
12. Mottrie A, De Naeyer G, Schatteman P et al (2010) Impact of the learning curve on perioperative outcomes in patients who underwent robotic partial nephrectomy for parenchymal renal tumours. Eur Urol 58(1): 127-132.
13. Ficarra V, Novara G, Secco S et al (2009) Preoperative aspects and dimensions used for an anatomical (PADUA) classification of renal tumours in patients who are candidates for nephron-sparing surgery. Eur Urol 56(5): 786-793.
14. Levey AS, Stevens LA, Schmid CH et al (2009) A new equation to estimate glomerular filtration rate. Ann Intern Med 150(9): 604-612.
15. Greene FL, Gospodarowicz M, Wittekend C et al (2009) American joint committee on cancer (AJCC) staging manual, 7th edn. Springer, Philadelphia.
16. Fuhrman SA, Lasky LC, Limas C (1982) Prognostic significance of morphologic parameters in renal cell carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol 6: 655-663.
17. Eble JN, Sauter G, Epstein JI et al (2004) Pathology and genetics of tumours of the urinary system and male genital organs. World health organization classification of tumours. IARC Press, Lyon.
18. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240: 205-213.
19. Wang AJ, Bhayani SB (2009) Robotic partial nephrectomy versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma: single-surgeon analysis of 100 consecutive procedures. Urology 73: 306-310.
20. Kural AR, Atug F, Tufek I et al (2009) Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: comparison of outcomes. J Endourol 23: 1491-1497.
21. Rogers CG, Patard JJ (2009) Rebuttal 2 open to debate. The motion: robotic partial nephrectomy is better than open partial nephrectomy. Eur Urol 56(3): 568-570. Epub 2009 Jun 24.
22. Pasticier G, Timsit MO, Badet L et al (2006) Nephron-sparing surgery for renal cell carcinoma: detailed analysis of complications over a 15-year period. Eur Urol 49(3): 485-490.
23. Campbell SC, Novick AC, Streem SB et al (1994) Complications of nephron sparing surgery for renal tumors. J Urol 151(5): 1177-1180.
24. Thompson RH, Leibovich BC, Lohse CM et al (2005) Complications of contemporary open nephron sparing surgery: a single institution experience. J Urol 174(3): 855-858.
25. Dulabon LM, Kaouk JH, Haber GP et al (2011) Multi-institutional analysis of robotic partial nephrectomy for hilar versus nonhilar lesions in 446 consecutive cases. Eur Urol 59(3): 325-330.
26. Gupta GN, Boris R, Chung P et al (2011) Robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for tumors greater than 4 cm and high nephrometry score: feasibility, renal functional, and oncological outcomes with minimum 1 year follow-up. Urol Oncol 31: 51-56.
27. van Poppel H, Bamelis B, Oyen R, Baert L (1998) Partial nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma can achieve long-term tumor control. J Urol 160(3 Pt 1): 674-678.
28. Stephenson AJ, Hakimi AA, Snyder ME, Russo P (2004) Complications of radical and partial nephrectomy in a large contemporary cohort. J Urol 171(1): 130-134.
29. Pomara G, Campo G, Francesca F (2009) Intraoperative and postoperative complications of nephron sparing surgery: prevention and possible treatments. Arch Ital Urol Androl 81(2): 80-85 Review.
30. Minervini A, Vittori G, Salvi M et al (2013) Analysis of surgical complications of renal tumor enucleation with standardized instruments and external validation of PADUA classification. Ann Surg Oncol 20(5): 1729-1736.