Open versus robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: Effect on clinical outcome

Journal of Endourology

Volumn 25, Issue 7, 2011, Pages 1181-1185

  Lee, Sangchul ^a   Oh, Jongjin ^a   Hong, Seong Kyu ^a   Lee, Sang Eun ^a   Byun, Seok Soo ^a  

^a Seoul National University Bundang Hospital   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CREATININE; KETOPROFEN;

ADULT; ANGIOMYOLIPOMA; BLEEDING; CANCER GRADING; CANCER STAGING; CLEAR CELL CARCINOMA; CONFERENCE PAPER; CREATININE BLOOD LEVEL; FEMALE; GLOMERULUS FILTRATION RATE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; ISCHEMIA; KIDNEY CARCINOMA; KIDNEY FUNCTION; KIDNEY TUMOR; LENGTH OF STAY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL RECORD REVIEW; ONCOCYTOMA; OPEN PARTIAL NEPHRECTOMY; OPERATION DURATION; PAPILLOMA; PARTIAL NEPHRECTOMY; PEROPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE ANALGESIA; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; ROBOT ASSISTED PARTIAL NEPHRECTOMY; ROBOTICS; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; TUMOR VOLUME;

FEMALE; HUMANS; KIDNEY FUNCTION TESTS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEPHRECTOMY; ROBOTICS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 79960229384     PISSN: 08927790     EISSN: 1557900X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/end.2010.0670     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (24)

1. Ljungberg B, Cowan NC, Hanbury DC, et al. EAU guidelines on renal cell carcinoma: The 2010 update. Eur Urol 2010;58:398-406.
2. Fergany AF, Hafez KS, Novick AC. Long-term results of nephron sparing surgery for localized renal cell carcinoma: 10-year followup. J Urol 2000;163:442-445. (Pubitemid 30060489)
3. Patard JJ, Shvarts O, Lam JS, et al. Safety and efficacy of partial nephrectomy for all T1 tumors based on an international multicenter experience. J Urol 2004;171:2181-2185. (Pubitemid 38625430)
4. Van Poppel H, Da Pozzo L, Albrecht W, et al. A prospective randomized EORTC intergroup phase 3 study comparing the complications of elective nephron-sparing surgery and radical nephrectomy for low-stage renal cell carcinoma. Eur Urol 2007;51:1606-1615. (Pubitemid 46634740)
5. Gill IS, Kavoussi LR, Lane BR, et al. Comparison of 1,800 laparoscopic and open partial nephrectomies for single renal tumors. J Urol 2007;178:41-46. (Pubitemid 46898481)
6. Riggs SB, Larochelle JC, Belldegrun AS. Partial nephrectomy: A contemporary review regarding outcomes and different techniques. Cancer J 2008;14:302-307.
7. Van Poppel H. Efficacy and safety of nephron-sparing surgery. Int J Urol 2010;17:314-326.
8. Stolzenburg JU, Liatsikos EN. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: What about hilar control? Eur Urol 2007;52:956-960.
9. Becker F, Van Poppel H, Hakenberg OW, et al. Assessing the impact of ischaemia time during partial nephrectomy. Eur Urol 2009;56:625-634.
10. Rogers CG, Patard JJ. Open to debate. The motion: Robotic partial nephrectomy is better than open partial nephrectomy. Eur Urol 2009;56:568-570.
11. Wang AJ, Bhayani SB. Robotic partial nephrectomy versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma: Single-surgeon analysis of > 100 consecutive procedures. Urology 2009;73:306-310.
12. Edge SB, Compton CC.The American Joint Committee on Cancer: the 7th edition of the AJCC cancer staging manual and the future of TNM. Ann Surg Oncol 2010;17:1471-1474.
13. Scoll BJ, Uzzo RG, Chen DY, et al. Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: A large single-institutional experience. Urology 2010;75:1328-1334.
14. Baumert H, Ballaro A, Shah N, et al. Reducing warm ischaemia time during laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: A prospective comparison of two renal closure techniques. Eur Urol 2007;52:1164-1169. (Pubitemid 47332039)
15. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: A new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 2004;240:205-213. (Pubitemid 38963009)
16. Pahernik S, Roos F, Hampel C, et al. Nephron sparing surgery for renal cell carcinoma with normal contralateral kidney: 25 years of experience. J Urol 2006;175:2027-2031. (Pubitemid 43668591)
17. Yossepowitch O, Thompson RH, Leibovich BC, et al. Positive surgical margins at partial nephrectomy: Predictors and oncological outcomes. J Urol 2008;179:2158-2163.
18. Huang WC, Elkin EB, Levey AS, et al. Partial nephrectomy versus radical nephrectomy in patients with small renal tumors-is there a difference in mortality and cardiovascular outcomes? J Urol 2009;181:55-62.
19. Huang WC, Levey AS, Serio AM, et al. Chronic kidney disease after nephrectomy in patients with renal cortical tumours: A retrospective cohort study. Lancet Oncol 2006;7:735-740. (Pubitemid 44283660)
20. Mottrie A, De Naeyer G, Schatteman P, et al. Impact of the learning curve on perioperative outcomes in patients who underwent robotic partial nephrectomy for parenchymal renal tumours. Eur Urol 2010;58:127-132.
21. Novick AC. Renal-sparing surgery for renal cell carcinoma. Urol Clin North Am 1993;20:277-282. (Pubitemid 23154477)
22. Funahashi Y, Hattori R, Yamamoto T, et al. Ischemic renal damage after nephron-sparing surgery in patients with normal contralateral kidney. Eur Urol 2009;55:209-215.
23. Yohannes P, Rotariu P, Pinto P, et al. Comparison of robotic versus laparoscopic skills: Is there a difference in the learning curve? Urology 2002;60:39-45. (Pubitemid 34722942)
24. Shapiro E, Benway BM, Wang AJ, Bhayani SB. The role of nephron-sparing robotic surgery in the management of renal malignancy. Curr Opin Urol 2009;19:76-80.