Predictive outcomes of revision total hip replacement - A consecutive series of 1176 patients with a minimum 10-year follow-up

Maturitas

Volumn 77, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 185-190

  Philpott, A ^a   Weston Simons, J S ^a   Grammatopoulos, G ^a   Bejon, P ^b   Gill, H S ^c   McLardy Smith, P ^b   Gundle, R ^b   Murray, D W ^a,b   Pandit, H ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^b NUFFIELD ORTHOPAEDIC CENTRE   (United Kingdom)

^c University of Bath   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

10 Year follow up; Outcome predictors; Revision total hip replacement; Survival

Indexed keywords

ACETABULUM; ADULT; AGE; AGED; ARTICLE; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HETEROTOPIC OSSIFICATION; HUMAN; IMPLANT SURVIVAL; LEG LENGTH INEQUALITY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; ORTHOPEDIC SURGEON; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; OXFORD HIP SCORE; PAIN; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PERIPROSTHETIC FRACTURE; PROSTHESIS LOOSENING; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SURVIVAL; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS; VERY ELDERLY; YOUNG ADULT;

10-YEAR FOLLOW-UP; OUTCOME PREDICTORS; REVISION TOTAL HIP REPLACEMENT; SURVIVAL;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT SATISFACTION; REOPERATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84893640706     PISSN: 03785122     EISSN: 18734111     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2013.10.019     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. D.J. Berry, W.S. Harmisen, M.E. Cabanela, and B.E. Money Twenty five years survivorship of two thousand consecutive primary Charnley total hip replacements J Bone Joint Surg Am 84-A 2002 171 177
2. K. Mäkelä, A. Eskelinen, P. Pulkkinen, P. Paavolainen, and V. Remes Cemented total hip replacement for primary osteoarthritis in patients aged 55 years or older: results of the 12 most common cemented implants followed for 25 years in the Finnish Arthroplasty Register J Bone Joint Surg Br 90-B 2008 1562 1569
3. C.E. Scott, K.E. Bugler, N.D. Clement, D. Macdonald, C.R. Howie, and L.C. Biant Patient expectations of arthroplasty of the hip and knee J Bone Joint Surg Br 94-B 2012 974 981
4. H.D. Williams, G. Browne, G.A. Gie, R.S. Ling, A.J. Timperley, and N.A. Wendover The Exeter universal cemented femoral component at 8 to 12 years. A study of the first 325 hips J Bone Joint Surg Br 84-B 2002 324 334
5. R.E. Anakwe, P.J. Jenkins, and M. Moran Predicting dissatisfaction after total hip arthroplasty: a study of 850 patients J Arthroplasty 26 2011 209 213
6. S. Kurtz, F. Mowat, K. Ong, N. Chan, E. Lau, and M. Halpern Prevalence of primary and revision total hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 1990 through 2002 J Bone Joint Surg Am 87-A 2005 1487 1497
7. G. Garellick, J. Karrholm, C. Rogmark, P. Herberts, and Swedish Joint Registry Annual report 2010 http://www.shpr.se/en/Publications/DocumentsReports. aspx [accessed 02.09.12].
8. S.A. Lie, L.I. Havelin, O.N. Furnes, L.B. Engesaeter, and S.E. Vollset Failure rates for 4762 revision total hip arthroplasties in the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register J Bone Joint Surg Br 86-B 2004 504 509
9. B.D. Springer, T.K. Fehring, W.L. Griffin, S.M. Odum, and J.L. Masonis Why revision total hip arthroplasty fails Clin Orthop Relat Res 467 2009 166 173
10. S.M. Jafari, C. Coyle, S.M. Mortazavi, P.F. Sharkey, and J. Parvizi Revision hip arthroplasty: infection is the most common cause of failure Clin Orthop Relat Res 468 2010 2046 2051
11. Primary Hip Replacement Surgery: Absolute Criteria South West London Commissioning Network www.kci-nhs.org.uk/S./SWL-PrimHipReplace-1-04-08.doc.
12. A.M. Davis, Z. Agnidis, E. Badley, A. Kiss, J.P. Waddell, and A.E. Gross Predictors of functional outcome two years following revision hip arthroplasty J Bone Joint Surg Am 88-A 2006 685 691
13. G.S. Biring, B.A. Masri, N.V. Greidanus, C.P. Duncan, and D.S. Garbuz Predictors of quality of life outcomes after revision total hip replacement J Bone Joint Surg Br 89-B 2007 1446 1451
14. B.L. Atkins, N. Athanasou, and J.J. Deeks et al. Prospective evaluation of criteria for microbiological diagnosis of prosthetic-joint infection at revision arthroplasty, The OSIRIS Collaborative Study Group J Clin Microbiol 36 1998 2932 2939
15. J.M. Mirra, H.C. Amstutz, M. Matos, and R. Gold The pathology of the joint tissues and its clinical relevance in prosthesis failure Clin Orthop Relat Res 117 1976 221 240
16. P. Bejon, A. Berendt, and B.L. Atkins et al. Two-stage revision for prosthetic joint infection: predictors of outcome and the role of reimplantation microbiology J Antimicrob Chemother 65 2010 569 575
17. J. Dawson, R. Fitzpatrick, A. Carr, and D. Murray Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total hip replacement J Bone Joint Surg Br 78-B 1996 185 190
18. D.W. Murray, R. Fitzpatrick, and K. Rogers et al. The use of the Oxford hip and knee scores J Bone Joint Surg Br 89-B 2007 1010 1014
19. E.L. Kaplan, and P. Meier Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations J Am Stat Assoc 53 1958 457 481
20. J. Dawson, R. Fitzpatrick, S. Frost, R. Gundle, P. McLardy-Smith, and D. Murray Evidence for the validity of a patient-based instrument for assessment of outcome after revision hip replacement J Bone Joint Surg Br 83-B 2001 1125 1129
21. J.M. Cuckler Unexplained pain after THR: what should I do? Orthopedics 33 2010 648
22. Provisional Monthly Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) in England April 2009 - April 2010: Pre- and post- operative data: Experimental statistics. Accessed at Hospital Statistics Online www.hqip.org.uk/assets/NCAPOP-Library/ PROMsreport09101.pdf.
23. S.R. Jibodh, A.O. Kandil, H. Malchau, and D.M. Estok II Do commonly reported outcome measures reflect patient satisfaction after revision hip arthroplasty? J Arthroplasty 25 2010 41 45