Resource geographies II: The resource-state nexus

Progress in Human Geography

Volumn 38, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 118-130

  Bridge, Gavin ^a  

^a DURHAM UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

land grabs; post neoliberal; resources; state; territory

Indexed keywords

GOVERNANCE APPROACH; HUMAN GEOGRAPHY; RESOURCE MANAGEMENT; STATE ROLE; TERRITORY;

EID: 84893623803     PISSN: 03091325     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0309132513493379     Document Type: Article

References (94)

1. Alatout S.'States' of scarcity: Water, space and identity politics in Israel, 1948-59.Environment and Planning D: Society and Space. 2008;26:959-982.
2. Arsel M.Between 'Marx and markets'? The state, the 'left turn' and nature in Ecuador.Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie. 2012;103:150-163.
3. Asher K,Ojeda D.Producing nature and making the state: Ordenamiento territorial in the Pacific lowlands of Colombia.Geoforum. 2009;40:292-302.
4. Bailis R,Baka J.Constructing sustainable biofuels: Governance of the emerging biofuel economy.Annals of the Association of American Geographers. 2011;101 (4): 827-838.
5. Baird I,Le Billon P.Landscapes of political memories: War legacies and land negotiations in Laos.Political Geography. 2012;31 (5): 290-300.
6. Bakker K.The limits of 'neoliberal natures': Debating green neoliberalism.Progress in Human Geography. 2010;34 (6): 715-735.
7. Ballvé T.Everyday state formation: Territory, decentralization, and the narco landgrab in Colombia.Environment and Planning D: Society and Space. 2012;30 (4): 603-622.
8. Bebbington ASocial Conflict, Economic Development and Extractive Industry: Evidence from South America. Abingdon: Routledge; 2012:.
9. Bebbington A,Bebbington D.An Andean Avatar: Post-neoliberal and neoliberal strategies for securing the unobtainable.New Political Economy. 2011;43 (6): 1152-1162.
10. BeddingtonJ (2009) Food, energy, water and the climate: A perfect storm of global events?Available at: http://www.dius.gov.uk/assets/goscience/docs/p/perfect-storm-paper.pdf.
11. Bernstein HClass Dynamics and Agrarian Change. Sterling, VA: Kumarian Press; 2010:.
12. Birkenholtz T.Groundwater governmentality: Hegemony and technologies of resistance in Rajathan's (India) groundwater governance.The Geographical Journal. 2009;175 (3): 208-220.
13. Borras S,Hall R,Scoones I, et al.Towards a better understanding of global land grabbing: An editorial introduction.Journal of Peasant Studies. 2011;38 (2): 209-216.
14. Braun B.Producing vertical territory: Geology and governmentality in late Victorian Canada.Cultural Geographies. 2000;7 (1): 7-46.
15. Budds J.Contested H2O: Science, policy and politics in water resources management in Chile.Geoforum. 2009;40:418-430.
16. Buscher B.The political economy of Africa's natural resources and the 'Great Financial Crisis'.Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie. 2012;103 (2): 136-149.
17. Carmody P.Cruciform sovereignty, matrix governance and the scramble for Africa's oil: Insights from Chad and Sudan.Political Geography. 2009;28:353-361.
18. Carmody PThe New Scramble for Africa. Cambridge: Polity Press; 2011:.
19. Castree N.Neoliberalising nature: The logics of deregulation and reregulation.Environment and Planning A. 2008a;40 (1): 131-152.
20. Castree N.Neoliberalising nature: Processes, effects, and evaluations.Environment and Planning A. 2008b;40 (1): 153-173.
21. Coe NM,Cochrane A,Randalls S, et al.'State, science and the skies: governmentalities of the British atmosphere', by Mark Whitehead (2009): A critical review.Geoforum. 2012;43 (6): 1057-1064.
22. Dittmer J,Moisio S,Ingram A, et al.Have you heard the one about the disappearing ice? Recasting Arctic geopolitics.Political Geography. 2011;30:202-214.
23. A polar Mediterranean? Accessibility, resources and sovereignty in the Arctic Ocean.Global Policy. 2010a;1 (3): 303-311.
24. Flag planting and finger pointing: The Law of the Sea, the Arctic and the political geographies of the outer continental shelf.Political Geography. 2010b;29 (2): 63-73.
25. Dodds K,Bennwell M.More unfinished business: The Falklands/Malvinas, maritime claims, and the spectre of oil in the South Atlantic.Environment and Planning D: Society and Space. 2010;28 (4): 571-580.
26. Eguavoen I,Laube WNegotiating Local Governance: Natural Resources Management at the Interface of Communities and the State. Münster: LIT Verlag; 2010:.
27. Ekers M.The political ecology of hegemony in depression-era British Columbia, Canada: Masculinities, work, and the production of the forestscape.Geoforum. 2009;40:303-315.
28. Ekers M,Loftus A,Mann G.Gramsci lives!.Geoforum. 2009;40:287-291.
29. Emel J,Huber M,Makene M.Extracting sovereignty: Capital, territory, and gold mining in Tanzania.Political Geography. 2011;30:70-79.
30. Evered K,Evered E.State, peasant, mosquito: The biopolitics of public health education and malaria in early republican Turkey.Political Geography. 2012;31:311-323.
31. Evenden M.Mobilizing rivers: Hydro-electricity, the state, and World War II in Canada.Annals of the Association of American Geographers. 2009;99 (5): 845-855.
32. Fairhead J,Leach M,Scoones I.Green grabbing: A new appropriation of nature?.Journal of Peasant Studies. 2012;39 (2): 237-261.
33. Feitelson E,Fischhendler I.Spaces of water governance: The case of Israel and its neighbors.Annals of the Association of American Geographers. 2009;99 (4): 728-745.
34. Foucault MThe Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality. Burchell GGordon CMiller P, ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1991:87-104.
35. Gidwani VCapital, Interrupted: Agrarian Development in the Politics of Work in India. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press; 2008:.
36. Gonzalez-Vicente R.The internationalization of the Chinese state.Political Geography. 2011;30:402-411.
37. Grugel J,Riggirozzi P.Post-neoliberalism in Latin America: Rebuilding and reclaiming the state after crisis.Development and Change. 2012;43 (1): 1-21.
38. Hall D.Food with a visible face: Traceability and the public promotion of private governance in the Japanese food system.Geoforum. 2010;41 (5): 826-835.
39. Hall DLand. Cambridge: Polity Press; 2013:.
40. Hall D,Hirsch P,Li TPowers of Exclusion: Land Dilemmas in Southeast Asia. Singapore: National University of Singapore Press; 2011:.
41. Harris L.State as socionatural effect: Variable and emergent geographies of the state in southeastern Turkey.Comparative Studies of South Asia, Africa and the Middle East. 2012;32 (1): 25-39.
42. Harris L,Alatout S.Negotiating hydro-scales, forging states: Comparison of the upper Tigris/Euphrates and Jordan River basins.Political Geography. 2010;29:148-156.
43. Hindery DFrom Enron to Evo: Pipeline Politics, Global Environmentalism, and Indigenous Rights in Bolivia. Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona Press; 2013:.
44. Ioris A.The neoliberalisation of water in Lima, Peru.Political Geography. 2012;31:266-278.
45. Kaplan RThe Revenge of Geography: What the Map Tells Us about Coming Conflicts and the Battle Against Fate. New York: Random House; 2011:.
46. Kaup BZ.A neoliberal nationalization? The constraints on natural-gas-led development in Bolivia.Latin American Perspectives. 2010;37 (3): 123-138.
47. Khan M.The Nishorgo Support Project, the Lawachara National Park, and the Chevron seismic survey: Forest conservation or energy procurement in Bangladesh?.Journal of Political Ecology. 2010;17:68-78.
48. Klare MThe Race for What's Left: The Global Scramble for the World's Resources. New York: Metropolitan Books; 2011:.
49. Kohl B,Farthing L.Material constraints to popular imaginaries: The extractive economy and resource nationalism in Bolivia.Political Geography. 2012;31 (4): 225-235.
50. Kristoffersen B,Young S.Geographies of security and statehood in Norway's 'Battle of the North'.Geoforum. 2010;41:577-584.
51. Leach M,Fairhead J,Fraser J.Green grabs and biochar: Revaluing African soils and farming in the new carbon economy.Journal of Peasant Studies. 2012;39 (2): 285-307.
52. Leichenko R,O'Brien KEnvironmental Change and Globalization: Double Exposures. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2008:.
53. Levien M.The land question: Special economic zones and the political economy of dispossession in India.Journal of Peasant Studies. 2012;39 ((3-4)): 933-969.
54. Li TMThe Will to Improve: Governmentality, Development and the Practice of Politics. Durham, NC: Duke University Press; 2007:.
55. Lockwood M,Davidson J,Curtis A, et al.Multi-level environmental governance: Lessons from Australian natural resource management.Australian Geographer. 2009;40 (2): 169-186.
56. McAfee K,Shapiro E.Payments for ecosystem services in Mexico: Nature, neoliberalism, social movements and the state.Annals of the Association of American Geographers. 2010;100 (3): 579-599.
57. McCarthy J.Devolution in the woods: Community forestry as hybrid neoliberalism.Environment and Planning A. 2005;37 (6): 995-1014.
58. Mann G.Should political ecology be Marxist? A case for Gramsci's historical materialism.Geoforum. 2009;40:335-344.
59. Meehan K.Disciplining de facto development: Water theft and hydrosocial order in Tijuana.Environment and Planning D: Society and Space. 2013;31:319-336.
60. Mehta L,Veldwisch G,Franco J.Water Grabbing? Focus on the (re)appropriation of finite water resources.Water Alternatives. 2012;5 (2): 193-207.
61. Mitchell TColonising Egypt. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press; 1991:.
62. Nem Singh J.Reconstituting the neostructuralist state: The political economy of continuity and change in Chilean mining policy.Third World Quarterly. 2010;31 (8): 1413-1433.
63. Nem Singh J.Towards post-neoliberal resource politics? The international political economy (IPE) of oil and copper in Brazil and Chile.New Political Economy. 2013;:.
64. Neville K,Dauvergne P.Biofuels and the politics of mapmaking.Political Geography. 2012;31:279-289.
65. OliveiraG (2011) Land regularization in Brazil and the global land grab: A statemaking framework for analysis. Paper presented at the International Conference on Global Land Grabbing, 6-8 April. Available at: http://www.iss.nl/fileadmin/ASSETS/iss/Documents/Conference_papers/LDPI/88_Gustavo_Oliveira.pdf.
66. Olson B.Paper trails: The Outdoor Recreation Resource Review Commission and the rationalization of recreational resources.Geoforum. 2010;41:447-456.
67. Ong ANeoliberalism as Exception: Mutations in Sovereignty and Citizenship. Durham, NC: Duke University Press; 2006:.
68. Painter J.Prosaic geographies of stateness.Political Geography. 2006;25:752-774.
69. Peluso N,Vandergeest P.Genealogies of the Political Forest and customary rights in Indonesia, Malayasia and Thailand.Journal of Asian Studies. 2001;60 (3): 761-812.
70. Peluso N,Vandergeest PGlobal Political Ecology. Peet RRobbins PWatts M, ed. New York: Routledge; 2011:254-284.
71. Perkins H.Gramsci in green: Neoliberal hegemony through urban forestry and the potential for a political ecology of praxis.Geoforum. 2011;42:558-566.
72. Perreault T,Valdivia G.Hydrocarbons, popular protect and national imaginaries: Ecuador and Bolivia in comparative context.Geoforum. 2010;41 (5): 689-699.
73. Potter L.Resource periphery, corridor, heartland: Contesting land use in the Kalimantan/Malaysia borderlands.Asia Pacific Viewpoint. 2009;50:88-106.
74. Powell R.Configuring an Arctic Commons?.Political Geography. 2008;27:827-832.
75. Powell R.Echoes of the New Geography? History and philosophy of geography I.Progress in Human Geography. 2012;36 (4):.
76. Prudham S,Coleman WProperty, Territory, Globalization: Struggles over Autonomy. Coleman WD, ed. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press; 2011:1-28.
77. Radcliffe S.Development for a postneoliberal era? Sumak kawsay, living well and the limits of decolonization in Ecuador.Geoforum. 2011;43 (2): 240-249.
78. Robbins PThe SAGE Handbook of Political Geography. Cox KRLow MRobinson J, ed. London: SAGE; 2008:205-218.
79. Robertson M,Wainwright J.The value of nature to the state.Annals of the Association of American Geographers. 2013;:.
80. Scott JSeeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press; 1998:.
81. Sikor T,Lund CThe Politics of Possession: Property, Authority and Access to Natural Resources. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell; 2009:.
82. Sneddon C,Fox C.The Cold War, the US Bureau of Reclamation and the technopolitics of river basin development, 1950-1970.Political Geography. 2011;30 (8): 450-460.
83. Steinberg PThe Social Construction of the Ocean. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2001:.
84. Steinberg P.Sovereignty, territory, and the mapping of mobility: A view from the outside.Annals of the Association of American Geographers. 2009;99 (3): 467-495.
85. Steinberg P.Commentary: The Deepwater Horizon, the Mavi Marmara, and the dynamic zonation of ocean space.The Geographical Journal. 2011;177 (1): 12-16.
86. Sud N.The Indian state in a liberalizing landscape.Development and Change. 2009;40 (4): 645-665.
87. Vandergeest P,Unno A.A new extraterritoriality? Aquaculture certification, sovereignty, and empire.Political Geography. 2012;31:358-367.
88. Watts M.Antinomies of community: Some thoughts on geography, resources and empire.Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers. 2004;29 (2): 195-216.
89. White B,Borras S,Hall R, et al.The new enclosures: Critical perspectives on corporate land deals.The Journal of Peasant Studies. 2012;39 ((3-4)): 619-647.
90. Whitehead MState, Science and the Skies: Governmentalities of the British Atmosphere. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell; 2009:.
91. Whitehead M,Jones R,Jones MThe Nature of the State: Excavating the Political Ecologies of the Modern State. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2007:.
92. Wilshusen P.The receiving end of reform: Everyday responses to neoliberalisation in southeastern Mexico.Antipode. 2010;42 (3): 767-799.
93. Yeh E.Transnational environmentalism and entanglements of sovereignty: The tiger campaign across the Himalayas.Political Geography. 2012;31:408-418.
94. Zulu L.Politics of scale and community-based forest management in southern Malawi.Geoforum. 2009;40 (4): 686-99.