Fuel treatment prescriptions alter spatial patterns of fire severity around the wildland-urban interface during the Wallow Fire, Arizona, USA

Forest Ecology and Management

Volumn 318, Issue , 2014, Pages 122-132

  Kennedy, Maureen C ^a   Johnson, Morris C ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^b PACIFIC NORTHWEST RESEARCH STATION   (United States)

Author keywords

Environmental management; Fuel treatment; Spatial analysis; Wallow Fire; Wildland urban interface

Indexed keywords

EID: 84893612590     PISSN: 03781127     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2014.01.014     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Agee J.K., Skinner C.N. Basic principles of forest fuel reduction treatments. For. Ecol. Manage. 2005, 211(1-2):83-96. 10.1016/j.foreco.2005.01.034.
2. Agee J., Bahro B., Finney M., Omi P., Sapsis D., Skinner C.J.W., van Wagtendonk J.W., Weatherspoon C.P. The use of shaded fuelbreaks in landscape fire management. For. Ecol. Manage. 2000, 127:55-66.
3. Alexander M.E., Cruz M.G. Interdependencies between flame length and fireline intensity in predicting crown fire initiation and crown scorch height. Int. J. Wildland Fire 2012, 21:95-113.
4. Bostwick, P., Menakis, J., Sexton, T., 2011. How Fuel Treatments Saved Homes from the Wallow Fire. Edited and designed by Keller P. <> (20.05.13). http://www.fs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/stelprdb5320347.pdf.
5. Cain M.D. Height of stem-bark char underestimates flame length in prescribed burns. Fire Manage. Notes 1984, 45(1):17-21.
6. Churchill D.J., Larson A.J., Dahlgreen M.C., Franklin J.F., Hessburg P.F., Lutz J.A. Restoring forest resilience: From reference spatial patterns to silvicultural prescriptions and monitoring. For. Ecol. Manage. 2013, 291:442-457. 10.1016/j.foreco.2012.11.007.
7. Covington W.W., Moore M.M. Southwestern ponderosa forest structure: changes since Euro-American settlement. J. Forest. 1994, 92:39-44.
8. Finney M.A. Design of regular landscape fuel treatment patterns for modifying fire growth and behavior. Forest Sci. 2001, 47(2):219-228.
9. Fulé P.Z., Crouse J.E., Roccaforte J.P., Kalies E.L. Do thinning and/or burning treatments in western USA ponderosa or Jeffrey pine-dominated forests help restore natural fire behavior?. For. Ecol. Manage. 2012, 269:68-81.
10. Graham, R.T., McCaffrey, S., Jain, T.B., 2004. Science Basis for Changing Forest Structure to Modify Wildfire Behavior and Severity. U.S. Forest Service General Technical, Report. RMRS-GTR-120.
11. Graham, R., Finney, M., McHugh, C., Cohen, J., Calkin, D., Stratton, R., Bradshaw, L., Nikolov, N., 2012. Fourmile Canyon Fire Findings. U.S. Forest Service General Technical, Report. RMRS-GTR-289.
12. Haefner J.W. Modeling Biological Systems: Principles and Applications 1996, Chapman and Hall, New York, NY, pp. 93-94.
13. Haines D.A. A lower atmospheric severity index for wildland fire. Natl. Weather Digest 1988, 13(2):23-27.
14. Hessburg P.F., Agee J.K., Franklin J.F. Dry forests and wildland fires of the Inland Northwest USA: contrasting the landscape ecology of the pre-settlement modern eras. For. Ecol. Manage. 2005, 211(1-2):117-139. 10.1016/j.foreco.2005.02.016.
15. Hood S.M., McHugh C.W., Ryan K.C., Reinhard E., Smith S.L. Evaluation of a post-fire tree mortality model for western USA conifers. Int. J. Wildland Fire 2007, 16:679-689.
16. Johnson, M.C., Kennedy, M.C., in review. Vegetation Structure of Fuel Treatments Alters Fire Severity in the Wildland-urban Interface, Wallow Fire, Arizona, USA. Submitted to Canadian Journal of Forest Research.
17. Johnson M.C., Kennedy M.C., Peterson D.L. Simulating fuel treatment effects in dry forests of the western United States: testing the principles of a fire-safe forest. Can. J. For. Res. 2011, 41:1018-1030. 10.1139/X11-032.
18. Keeley J.E. Fire intensity, fire severity and burn severity: a brief review and suggested usage. Int. J. Wildland Fire 2009, 18(1):116-126. 10.1071/WF07049.
19. Kennedy M.C., Ford E.D., Singleton P., Finney M., Agee J.K. Informed multi-objective decision-making in environmental management using Pareto optimality. J. Appl. Ecol. 2008, 45(1):181-192. 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2007.01367.x.
20. Larson A.J., Churchill D. Tree spatial patterns in fire-frequent forests of western North America, including mechanisms of pattern formation and implications for designing fuel reduction and restoration treatments. For. Ecol. Manage. 2012, 267:74-92. 10.1016/j.foreco.2011.11.038.
21. Lehmkuhl J., Kennedy M.C., Ford E., Singleton P., Gaines W., Lind R. Seeing the forest for the fuel: Integrating ecological values and fuels management. For. Ecol. Manage. 2007, 246(1):73-80. 10.1016/j.foreco.2007.03.071.
22. Lindstrom M.J., Bates D.M. Nonlinear mixed effects models for repeated measures data. Biometrics 1990, 46:673-687.
23. Lyons-Tinsley C., Peterson D.L. Surface fuel treatments in young, regenerating stands affect wildfire severity in a mixed conifer forest, eastside Cascade Range, Washington, USA. For. Ecol. Manage. 2012, 270:117-125. 10.1016/j.foreco.2011.04.016.
24. Maranghides, A., Mell, W., 2013. Framework for Addressing the National Wildland Urban Interface Fire Problem-Determining Fire and Ember Exposure Zones Using a WUI Hazard Scale. NIST Technical Note 1748. <>. http://dx.doi.org/10.6028/NIST.TN.1748.
25. Martinson, E.J., Omi, P.N., 2003. Performance of Fuel Treatments Subjected to Wildfires. USDA Forest Service Proceedings RMRS-P-29.
26. Martinson, E.J., Omi, P.N., 2013. Fuel Treatments and Fire Severity: A Meta-analysis. USDA Forest Service Research Paper. RMRS-RP-103WWW.
27. Martinson, E., Omi, P.N., Shepperd, W., 2003. Part 3: Effects of fuel treatments on fire severity. In: Graham, Russell T. (Ed.), Hayman Fire Case Study. U.S. Forest Service General Technical, Report. RMRS-GTR-114.
28. McKenzie D., Kennedy M.C. Power laws reveal phase transitions in landscape controls of fire regimes. Nature Commun. 2012, 3:726. 10.1038/ncomms1731.
29. Mell W., Manzello S., Maranghides A. The wildland-urban interface fire problem-current approaches and research needs. Int. J. Wildland Fire 2010, 19:238-251.
30. Methvan, I.R., 1973. Fire, Succession and Community Structure in a Red and White Pine Stand. Information Report PS-X-43. Petawawa Forest Experiment Station. Chalk River, Ontario.
31. Methven, I.R., 1971. Prescribed Fire, Crown Scorch and Mortality: Field and Laboratory Studies on Red and White pine. Canadian Forestry Service, Petawawa Forest Experiment Station, Chalk River, Ontario. Information, Report PS-X-31.
32. Neary D.G., Zieroth E.J. Forest bioenergy system to reduce the hazard of wildfires: white mountains, Arizona. Biomass Bioenergy 2007, 31(9):638-645. 10.1016/j.biombioe.2007.06.028.
33. Peterson, D.L., Johnson, M.C., Agee, J.K., Jain, T.B., McKenzie, D., Reinhardt, E.D., 2005. Forest Structure and Fire Hazard in Dry Forests of the Western United States. U.S. Forest Service General Technical Repport. PNW-GTR-628.
34. Pinheiro, J., Bates, D., DebRoy, S., Sarkar, D., and the R Development Core Team, 2013. nlme: Linear and Nonlinear Mixed Effects Models. R package version 3.1-109.
35. Pollet J., Omi P.N. Effect of thinning and prescribed burning on crown fire severity in ponderosa pine forests. Int. J. Wildland Fire 2002, 11(1):1-10.
36. Prichard S.J., Peterson D.L., Jacobson K. Fuel treatments reduce the severity of wildfire effects in dry mixed conifer forest, Washington, USA. Can. J. For. Res. 2010, 40(8):1615-1626. 10.1139/X10-109.
37. R Core Team, 2012. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. <>. http://www.R-project.org/.
38. Radeloff V.C., Hammer R.B., Stewart S.I., Fried J.S., Holcomb S.S., McKeefry J.F. The wildland-urban interface in the United States. Ecol. Appl. 2005, 15(3):799-805.
39. Raymond C., Peterson D. Fuel treatments alter the effects of wildfire in a mixed-evergreen forest, Oregon, USA. Can. J. For. Resour. 2005, 35:2981-2995. 10.1139/X05-206.
40. Ritchie M.W., Skinner C.N., Hamilton T.A. Probability of tree survival after wildfire in an interior pine forest of northern California: effects of thinning and prescribed fire. For. Ecol. Manage. 2007, 247(1-3):200-208. 10.1016/j.foreco.2007.04.044.
41. Safford H.D., Schmidt D.A., Carlson C.H. Effects of fuel treatments on fire severity in an area of wildland-urban interface, Angora Fire, Lake Tahoe Basin, California. For. Ecol. Manage. 2009, 258(5):773-787. 10.1016/j.foreco.2009.05.024.
42. Safford H.D., Stevens J.T., Merriam K., Meyer M.D., Latimer A.M. Fuel treatment effectiveness in California yellow pine and mixed conifer forests. For. Ecol. Manage. 2012, 274:17-28. 10.1016/j.foreco.2012.02.013.
43. Scheller R.M., Spencer W.D., Rustigian-Romsos H., Syphard A.D., Ward B.C., Strittholt J.R. Using stochastic simulation to evaluate competing risks of wildfires and fuels management on an isolated forest carnivore. Landscape Ecol. 2011, 26:1491-1504. 10.1007/s10980-011-9663-6.
44. Sitko S., Hurteau S. Evaluating the Impacts of Forest Treatments: The First Five Years of the White Mountain Stewardship Project 2010, The Nature Conservancy, Phoenix, Arizona.
45. Steelman T.A., DuMond M.E. Serving the common interest in U.S. Forest Policy: a case study of the healthy forests restoration act. Environ. Manage. 2009, 43(3):396-410. 10.1007/s00267-008-9264-6.
46. Stewart S.I., Radeloff V.C., Hammer R.B., Hawbaker T.J. Defining the wildland-urban interface. J. Forest. 2007, 105:201-207.
47. Van Wagner C.E. Height of crown scorch in forest fires. Can. J. For. Res. 1973, 3:373-378.
48. Van Wagner C.E. Effect of slope on fires spreading downhill. Can. J. For. Res. 1988, 18:818-820.