Success Case Studies Contribute to Evaluation of Complex Research Infrastructure

Evaluation and the Health Professions

Volumn 37, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 98-113

  Hogle, Janice A ^a   Moberg, D Paul ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

CTSA; in depth interviews; large research infrastructures; program evaluation; qualitative evaluation; success case studies

Indexed keywords

AWARDS AND PRIZES; ECONOMICS; EDUCATION; FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HUMAN; INTERVIEW; NATIONAL HEALTH ORGANIZATION; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PERSONNEL; PROCEDURES; PROGRAM EVALUATION; PSYCHOLOGY; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; SOCIAL SUPPORT; STANDARDS; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; TEACHER; TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT; TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH; UNITED STATES;

AWARDS AND PRIZES; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; HUMANS; INTERVIEWS AS TOPIC; MENTORS; NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH (U.S.); ORGANIZATIONAL CASE STUDIES; PROGRAM EVALUATION; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; QUALITY IMPROVEMENT; RESEARCH PERSONNEL; RESEARCH SUPPORT AS TOPIC; SOCIAL SUPPORT; TRANSLATIONAL MEDICAL RESEARCH; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84893568294     PISSN: 01632787     EISSN: 15523918     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0163278713500140     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Bamberger M.,Rugh J.,Mabry L.RealWorld evaluation: Working under budget, time, data, and political constraints. 2012). RealWorld evaluation: Working under budget, time, data, and political constraints (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Retrieved fromhttp://www.realworldevaluation.org/Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2012:.
2. Brinkerhoff R. O.The success case study method. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler; 2002:.
3. Brinkerhoff R. O.Encyclopedia of evaluation. Mathison S., ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2005:401-402.
4. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (1999). CDC program evaluation framework. Retrieved fromhttp://www.cdc.gov/eval/framework/index.htm.
5. Clinical and Translational Science Awards. (2013). Accelerating discoveries toward better health. Retrieved fromhttps://ctsacentral.org/.
6. Cooperrider D. L.,Whitney D.A positive revolution in change: Appreciative inquiry. 2008:.
7. Davies R.,Dart J.The Most Significant Change (MSC) technique: A guide to its use. 2005:.
8. Frechtling J.,Raue K.,Michie J.,Miyaoka A.,Spiegelman M.The CTSA national evaluation final report. Rockville, MD: Westat; 2012:.
9. Kane C.,Alexander A.National Evaluators Survey Preliminary Results 2011-2012. 2012:.
10. Lee L. S.,Pusek S. N.,McCormack W. T.,Helitzer D. L.,Martina C. A.,Dozier A. M.,Rubio D. M.Clinical and translational scientist career success: Metrics for evaluation.Clinical and Translational Science. 2012;5:400-407.
11. framework. Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/eval/framework/index.htm
12. Patton M. Q.Qualitative research and evaluation methods. 2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2002:.
13. Patton M. Q.Utilization-focused evaluation. 2008). Utilization-focused evaluation (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2008:.
14. Patton M. Q.Developmental evaluation: Applying complexity concepts to enhance innovation and use. New York, NY: Guilford; 2011:.
15. Remington P.,Golden R. N.Transforming medicine from the bottom up.Wisconsin Medical Journal. 2009;108:166-167.
16. Rubio D. M.,Primack B. A.,Switzer G. E.,Byrce C. L.,Seltzer D. L.,Kapoor W. N.A comprehensive career-success model for physician-scientists.Academic Medicine. 2011;86:1571-1576.
17. Rubio D. M.,Schoenbaum E. E.,Lee L. S.,Schteingart D. E.,Marantz P. R.,Anderson K. E.Defining translational research: Implications for training.Academic Medicine. 2010;85:470-475.
18. Sargent J. F.Federal research and development funding: FY2013. Washington, DC:; 2013:.
19. Stake R. E.The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1995:.
20. Stowell F. A.,West D.Systems thinking in Europe. Jackson M. C.Mansell G. J.Flood R. L.Blackham R. B.Probert S. V. E., ed. New York, NY: Plenum; 1991:493-497.
21. Trajkovski S.,Schmied V.,Vickers M.,Jackson D.Implement the 4D cycle of appreciative inquiry in health care: A methodological review.Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2013;69:1224-1234.
22. Trochim W.,Kane C.,Graham M. J.,Pincus H. A.Evaluating translational research: A process marker model.Clinical and Translational Science. 2011;4:153-162.
23. UW ICTR.ICTR member survey report. Madison, WI: School of Medicine and Public Health, Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, University of Wisconsin-Madison; 2010:.
24. UW ICTR.Annual progress report. Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI: Unpublished annual report submitted to NCATS/NIH). School of Medicine and Public Health; 2012:.
25. UW ICTR Today Newsletter. (2012). Spotlight on: Bruce Christiansen, ICTR Pilot Grant Recipient. November/December, p. 4. Retrieved fromhttps://ictr.wisc.edu/files/ICTR_Today_v5n6_v6.pdf.
26. Yarbrough D. B.,Shulha L. M.,Hopson R. K.,Caruthers F. A.The program evaluation standards: A guide for evaluators and evaluation users. 2011). The program evaluation standards: A guide for evaluators and evaluation users (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Retrieved fromhttp://www.eval.org/evaluationdocuments/progeval.htmlThousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2011:.
27. Yin R. K.Applications of case study research. 2003). Applications of case study research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2003:.