Train travel passengers' willingness to pay to offset their CO2 emissions in Korea

Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews

Volumn 32, Issue , 2014, Pages 526-531

  Lim, Hea Jin ^a   Yoo, Seung Hoon ^b  

^a Korea Institute of Science and Technology   (South Korea)

^b Seoul National University of Science and Technology   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Contingent valuation; One and one half bound dichotomous choice; Voluntary carbon offsets; Willingness to pay

Indexed keywords

CARBON MARKETS; CARBON OFFSETS; CONTINGENT VALUATIONS; ONE-AND-ONE-HALF BOUND DICHOTOMOUS CHOICE; QUANTITATIVE INFORMATION; STATISTICAL EFFICIENCY; TRAVEL DISTANCE; WILLINGNESS TO PAY;

CARBON DIOXIDE; CLIMATE CHANGE; COMMERCE; ECONOMICS; GREENHOUSE GASES; RAILROAD TRANSPORTATION; RAILROADS;

CARBON;

EID: 84893566715     PISSN: 13640321     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2014.01.010     Document Type: Review

References (31)

1. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Climate change 2007: synthesis report. Geneva, Switzerland; 2007.
2. M. Gillenwater, D. Broekhoff, M. Trexler, J. Hyman, and R. Fowler Policing the voluntary carbon market Nat Rep: Clim Change 6 2007 85 87
3. A.G. Bumpus, and D.M. Liverman Accumulation by decarbonization and the governance of carbon offsets Econ Geogr 84 2 2008 127 155
4. N. Taiyab Exploring the market for voluntary carbon offsets 2006 International Institute for Environment and Development London
5. G.J. MacKerron, C. Egerton, C. Gaskell, A. Parpia, and S. Mourato Willingness to pay for carbon offset certification and co-benefits among (high-) flying young adults in the UK Energy Policy 37 2009 1372 1381
6. 2 emissions ClimChange 90 2008 299 313
7. J.S. Lee, S.H. Yoo, and S.J. Kwak Public's willingness to pay for preventing climate change Appl Econ Lett 17 2010 619 622
8. S.H. Yoo, S.J. Kwak, and T.Y. Kim Assessing the benefits of the greenhouse gas emissions reduction policy: a pilot study of Korea Int J Environ Pollut 15 2001 553 567
9. M.J. Kotchen, K.J. Boyle, and A.A. Leiserowitz Willingness-to-pay and policy-instrument choice for climate-change policy in the United States Energy Policy 55 2013 617 625
10. 2 emission reductions in Turkey: a contingent valuation survey Energy Policy 39 2011 689 698
11. W.J.W. Botzen van den Bergh JCJM. Risk attitudes to low-probability climate change risks: WTP for flood insurance J Econ Behav Organ 82 2012 151 166
12. J. Rode, R.M. Hogarth, and M.L. Menestrel Ethical differentiation and market behavior: an experimental approach J Econ Behav Organ 66 2008 265 280
13. P. De Pelsmacker, L. Driesen, and G. Rayp Do consumers care about ethics? Willingness to pay for fair-trade coffee J Consum Aff 39 2 2006 363 385
14. A. Banerjee, and B.D. Solomon Eco-labeling for energy efficiency and sustainability: a meta-evaluation of US programs Energy Policy 31 2003 109 123 (Pubitemid 36003339)
15. S. Mourato, V. Foster, and E. Ozdemiroglu Evaluation health and environmental impacts of pesticide use: implications for the design of eco-labels and pesticide taxes Environ Sci Technol 34 8 2000 1456 1461 (Pubitemid 30217469)
16. K. Nyborg, R.B. Howarth, and K.A. Brekke Green consumers and public policy: on socially contingent moral motivation Resour Energy Econ 28 2006 351 366 (Pubitemid 44542567)
17. K.A. Brekke, S. Kvembokk, and K. Nyborg An economics model of moral motivation J Public Econ 87 2003 1967 1983
18. 2 emissions and mitigation options in the domestic railways; 2008. Available at: 〈http://www.krri.re.kr.
19. Korean Railroad Research Institute, Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport. The study of mitigation option of greenhouse gas emissions in railways for climate change. Report; 2010.
20. Korean Railroad Research Institute. The foreign trends of mitigation policy of greenhouse gas emissions; 2008. Available at: 〈 http://www.krri.re.kr.
21. HM Government. Securing the future-delivering UK sustainable development strategy. Report; 2005.
22. HM Government. Climate change: the UK programme. Report; 2006.
23. R.J. Brent Applied cost-benefit analysis 1995 Edward Elgar Cheltenham
24. R.C. Mitchell, and R.T. Carson Using surveys to value public goods: the contingent valuation method 1989 Resources for the Future Washington, DC
25. S.H. Yoo, and K.S. Chae Measuring the economic benefits of the ozone pollution control policy in Seoul: results of a contingent valuation survey Urban Stud 38 2001 49 60
26. K. Arrow, R. Solow, P.R. Portney, E.E. Leamer, R. Radner, and H. Schuman Report of the NOAA Panel on contingent valuation Fed Regist 58 1993 4601 4614
27. J.C. Cooper, M. Hanemann, and G. Signorello One and one-half bound dichotomous choice contingent valuation Rev Econ Stat 84 2002 742 750
28. W.M. Hanemann Welfare evaluations in contingent valuation experiments with discrete responses Am J Agric Econ 66 1984 332 341
29. B. Kriström Spike models in contingent valuation Am J Agric Econ 79 1997 1013 1023
30. S.H. Yoo, and S.J. Kwak Using a spike model to deal with zero response data from double bounded dichotomous choice contingent valuation surveys Appl Econ Lett 9 2002 929 932
31. I. Krinsky, and A.L. Robb On approximating the statistical properties of elasticities Rev Econ Stat 68 1986 715 719