What determines urban households' willingness to pay for CO2 emission reductions in Turkey: A contingent valuation survey

Energy Policy

Volumn 39, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 689-698

  Adaman, Fikret ^a   Karalidotless, Nihan ^a   Kumbaroĝlu, Gürkan ^a   Or, Ilhan ^a   Özkaynak, Begüm ^a   Zenginobuz, Ünal ^a  

^a BOGAZICI UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Climate change; Contingent valuation; Turkey

Indexed keywords

CONTINGENT VALUATIONS; EMISSION REDUCTION; ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES; ENVIRONMENTAL KNOWLEDGE; POWER PRODUCTION; SOCIO-ECONOMIC FACTOR; TURKEY; TURKISHS; URBAN-HOUSEHOLD; WILLINGNESS TO PAY;

DEVELOPING COUNTRIES; EMISSION CONTROL; GAS EMISSIONS; GLOBAL WARMING; GREENHOUSE GASES; SURVEYS;

ECONOMICS;

CARBON DIOXIDE; CARBON EMISSION; CLIMATE CHANGE; CONTINGENT VALUATION; GREENHOUSE GAS; URBAN AREA; WILLINGNESS TO PAY;

TURKEY;

EID: 78650417845     PISSN: 03014215     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2010.10.042     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Adaman F., Arsel M. Environmentalism in Turkey 2005, Ashgate, Aldershot.
2. Adaman F., Arsel M. Globalization, development, and environmental policies in Turkey. Understanding the Process of Institutional Change in Turkey: A Political Economy Approach 2010, Nova, Aldershot, pp. 319-335. T. çetin, F. Yidotlesslmaz (Eds.).
3. Adaman, F., çarkoĝlu, A., Şenatalar, B., 2009. Hanehalkidotless Gözünden Kamu Hizmetleri ve Yolsuzluk. Tepav, Ankara.
4. Adem ç. Non-state actors and environmentalism. Environmentalism in Turkey 2005, 71-86. Ashgate, Aldershot. F. Adaman, M. Arsel (Eds.).
5. Alberini A., Kahn J.R. Handbook on Contingent Valuation 2006, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.
6. Alvarez-Farizo B., Hanley N. Using conjoint analysis to quantify public preferences over the environmental impacts of wind farms: an example from Spain. Energy Policy 2002, 30(2):107-116.
7. Aoki, K., 2009. Do consumers select food products based on carbon dioxide emissions? Evidence from a buying experiment in Japan. Discussion Paper No. 749, The Institute of Social and Economic Research, Osaka University, Japan.
8. Arrow, K., Solow, R., Portney, P.R., Learner, E.E., Radner, R., Schuman, H., 1993. Report of the NOAA panel on contingent valuation. Federal Register, 58, pp. 4601-4614.
9. Bateman I.J., Carson R.T., Day B., Hanemann M., Hanley N., Hett T., Jones-Lee M., Loomes G., Mourato S., Özdemiroĝlu E., Pearce D.W., Sugden R., Swanson J. Economic Valuation with Stated Preference Techniques: A Manual 2002, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.
10. 1999, Valuing Environmental Preferences: Theory and Practice of the Contingent Valuation Method in the US, EU, and Developing Countries. Oxford University Press, Oxford. I.J. Bateman, K.G. Willis (Eds.).
11. Bergmann A., Hanley N., Wright R. Valuing the attributes of renewable energy investments. Energy Policy 2006, 34(9):1004-1014.
12. The Contingent Valuation of Environmental Resources: Methodological Issues and Research Needs 1996, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham. D.J. Bjornstad, J.R. Kahn (Eds.).
13. 2 emissions. Climate Change 2008, 90(3):299-313.
14. Cameron T.A. Individual option prices for climate change mitigation. Journal of Public Economics 2005, 89(2-3):283-301.
15. Carson R. Contingent Valuation: A Comprehensive Bibliography and History 2008, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.
16. Carson R., Groves T. Incentives and informational properties of preference questions. Environmental & Resource Economics 2007, 37(1):181-210.
17. Carson R.T., Hanemann W.M. Contingent valuation. Handbook of Environmental Economics, first ed. 2006, vol. 2:821-936. Elsevier.
18. Champ P.A., Flores N.E., Brown T.C., Chivers J. Contingent valuation and incentives. Land Economics 2002, 78(4):591-604.
19. Ciriacy-Wantrup S.V. Capital returns from soil conservation practices. Journal of Farm Economics 1947, 29(4):1181-1196.
20. Cummings R., Harrison G. Was the Ohio Court well informed in its assessment of the accuracy of the contingent valuation method?. Natural Resources Journal 1994, 34(Winter):1-36.
21. Davis, R., 1963. The value of outdoor recreation: an economic study of the marine woods. Doctoral Dissertation in Economics, Harvard University.
22. DEKTMK (Dünya Enerji Konseyi Türk Milli Komitesi), 2007. 2005-2006 Türkiye Enerji Raporu, Ankara.
23. Getzner M. A framework for valuing nature. Alternatives for Environmental Valuation 2005, 23-50. Routledge, London. M. Getzner, C.L. Spash, S. Stagl (Eds.).
24. Alternatives for Environmental Valuation 2005, Routledge, London. M. Getzner, C.L. Spash, S. Stagl (Eds.).
25. Gökşen F., Adaman F., Zenginobuz ü. On environmental concern, willingness to pay, and post-materialist values: evidence from Istanbul. Environment and Behaviour 2002, 344(5):616-633.
26. Gökşen F., Özertan G., Saĝlam I., Zenginobuz Å. Impacts of the tax system on poverty and social exclusion: a case study on Turkey. New Perspectives on Turkey 2008, 38 (Spring):159-179.
27. Gore A. An Inconvenient Truth: The Planetary Emergency of Global Warming and What We Can Do About It 2006, Rodale Books, New York.
28. Haberl H., Fischer-Kowalski M., Krausmann F., Weisz H., Winiwarter W. Progress towards sustainability? What the conceptual framework of material and energy flow accounting (MEFA) can offer. Land Use Policy 2004, 12(3):199-213.
29. Contingent Valuation: A Critical Assessment. North-Hollard, Amsterdam 1993, J.A. Hausman (Ed.).
30. Incecik, S., Görgün, E., Ateşsaçan, T., Erengüç, A., 2007. Sanayide AB çevre Mevzuatidotlessna Uyum. TüSIAD, Istanbul.
31. IPCC, 2007. Climate change 2007: the physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.
32. Jin J., Wang Z., Liu X. Valuing black-faced spoonbill conservation in Macao: a policy and contingent valuation study. Ecological Economics 2008, 68(1-2):328-335.
33. Klein, N., 2010. The courage to say No. The Nation, January 4, 2010.
34. Koundouri P. Econometrics Informing Natural Resources Management: Selected Case Studies 2004, Edward-Elgar, Cheltenham.
35. Kumbaroĝlu, G., Aridotlesskan, Y., 2009. Farkidotlessndalidotlessk ve Fark Yaratmak: Türkiye'nin Salidotlessmlaridotless-CO2. Açidotlessk Toplum Vakfidotless, Istanbul.
36. 2, GDP and RET: an aggregate economic equilibrium analysis for Turkey. Energy Economics 2008, 36(7):2694-2708.
37. Longo, A., Markandya, A., Petrucci, M., 2007. The internalization of externalities in the production of electricity: willingness to pay for the attributes of a policy for renewable energy. Working Paper, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.
38. Luzar E., Cosse K. Willingness to pay or intention to pay: the attitude-behavior relationship in contingent valuation. Journal of Socio-Economics 1998, 27(3):444-527.
39. Menges R., Schroeder C., Traub S. Altruism, warm glow and the willingness-to-donate for green electricity: an artefactual field experiment. Environmental & Resource Economics 2005, 31(4):431-458.
40. Meyerhoff J. Non-use values and attitudes: wetlands threatened by climate change. Alternatives for Environmental Valuation 2005, Routledge, London, pp. 51-68. M. Getzner, C.L. Spash, S. Stagl (Eds.).
41. Mitchell R.C., Carson R.T. Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method 1989, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.
42. Nelson W. Applied Life Analysis 1982, John Wiley & Sons, New York.
43. Norgaard K.M. "We don't really want to know": environmental justice and socially organized denial of global warming in Norway. Organisation and Environment 2006, 19(3):347-370.
44. Nunes P., Schokkaert E. Warm glow effect in contingent valuation. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 2003, 45(2):234-245.
45. O'Garra T., Mourato S., Garrity L., Schmidt P., Beerenwinkel A., Altmann M., Hart D., Graesel C., Whitehouse S. Is the public willing to pay for hydrogen buses? A comparative study of preferences in four cities. Energy Policy 2007, 35(7):3630-3642.
46. Ostrom, E., 2009. A polycentric approach for coping with climate change. Working paper (no. 5095), The World Bank.
47. Özesmi, U., Altuntop, N., 2007. TEMA Enerji Raporu, Istanbul.
48. Paavola J. Institutions and environmental governance: a reconceptualization. Ecological Economics 2007, 63(1):93-103.
49. Pearce D.W. The social cost of carbon and its policy implications. Oxford Review of Economic Policy 2003, 19(3):362-384.
50. Petrolia D.R., Bhattacharjee S., Hudson D., Herndon C.W. Do Americans want ethanol? A comparative contingent-valuation study of willingness to pay for E-10 and E-8. Energy Economics 2010, 32(1):121-128.
51. Pieters R., Bijmolt T., van Raaij F., de Kruijk M. Consumers' attributions of proenvironmental behavior, motivation and ability to self and others. Journal of Public Policy and Management 1998, 17(2):215-225.
52. Polanyi K. The Great Transformation 1944, Beacon Press, Boston.
53. Roe B., Teisl M.F., Levy A., Russell M. US consumers' willingness to pay for green electricity. Energy Policy 2001, 29(11):917-925.
54. Sandvik H. Public concern over global warming correlates negatively with national wealth. Climate Change 2008, 90(3):333-341.
55. Scarpa R., Bateman I. Efficiency gains afforded by improved bid design versus follow-up valuation questions in discrete-choice CV studies. Land Economics 2000, 76(2):299-311.
56. Spash C.L. Contingent valuation design and data treatment: if you can't shoot the messenger, change the message. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 2008, 26(1):34-53.
57. Stern N. The Economics of Climate Change: The Stern Review 2006, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
58. Stern N. Blueprint for a Safer Planet: How to Manage Climate Change and Create a New Era of Progress and Prosperity 2009, Vintage, London.
59. Sugden R. Reciprocity: the supply of public goods through voluntary contribution. The Economic Journal 1984, 94(376):772-787.
60. Tjernstörm E., Tietenberg T. Do the differences in attitudes explain differences in national climate change policies?. Ecological Economics 2008, 65:315-324.
61. TURKSTAT (Statistical Institute of Turkey), 2009. http://www.turkstat.gov.tr.
62. Turkey, 2009. Progress Report. European Commission, Brussels.
63. Vatn A. Institutions and the Environment 2005, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.
64. Venkatachalam L. The contingent valuation method: a review. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 2004, 24(1):89-124.
65. Wiser R.H. Using contingent valuation to explore willingness to pay for renewable energy: a comparison of collective and voluntary payment vehicles. Ecological Economics 2007, 62(3-4):419-432.
66. World Values Survey, 2009. http://www.worldvaluessurvey.org.