You and me and the computer makes three: Variations in exam room use of the electronic health record

Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association

Volumn 21, Issue E2, 2014, Pages

  Saleem, Jason J ^a   Flanagan, Mindy E ^b   Russ, Alissa L ^a,b,c,d   McMullen, Carmit K ^e   Elli, Leora ^f   Russell, Scott A ^a   Bennett, Katelyn J ^a,g   Matthias, Marianne S ^a,b,c   Rehman, Shakaib U ^h   Schwartz, Mark D ^a,g   Frankel, Richard M ^a,b,c,i  

^a VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c REGENSTRIEF INSTITUTE   (United States)

^d PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e CENTER FOR HEALTH RESEARCH   (United States)

^f VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^g NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^h CARL T HAYDEN VA MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

ⁱ INDIANA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMBULATORY CARE; ARTICLE; COMPUTER INTERFACE; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE SYSTEM; HUMAN; MALE; PATIENT CARE; WORKFLOW;

CLINICAL DOCUMENTATION; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS; PROVIDER-PATIENT COMMUNICATION; WORKFLOW;

AMBULATORY CARE; ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; ATTITUDE TO COMPUTERS; DELIVERY OF HEALTH CARE, INTEGRATED; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS; HUMANS; INTERVIEWS AS TOPIC; PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS; UNITED STATES; UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS;

EID: 84893560926     PISSN: 10675027     EISSN: 1527974X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/amiajnl-2013-002189     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Frankel R, Altschuler A, George S, et al. Effects of exam-room computing on clinician-patient communication: a longitudinal qualitative study. J Gen Intern Med 2005;20:677-82.
2. Shachak A, Reis S. The impact of electronic medical records on patient-doctor communication during consultation: a narrative literature review. J Eval Clin Pract 2009;15:641-9.
3. Patel VL, Arocha JF, Kushniruk AW. Patients' and physicians' understanding of health and biomedical concepts: relationship to the design of EMR systems. J Biomed Inform 2002;35:8-16.
4. Smith SW, Koppel R. Healthcare information technology's relativity problems: a typology of how patients' physical reality, clinicians' mental models, and healthcare information technology differ. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2014;21:117-31.
5. Doyle RJ, Wang N, Anthony D, et al. Computers in the examination room and the electronic health record: physicians' perceived impact on clinical encounters before and after full installation and implementation. Fam Pract 2012;29: 601-8.
6. Hsu J, Huang J, Fung V, et al. Health information technology and physician-patient interactions: impact of computers on communication during outpatient primary care visits. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2005;12:474-80.
7. Pearce C, Arnold M, Phillips C, et al. The patient and the computer in the primary care consultation. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2011;18:138-42.
8. Institute of Medicine. Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2001.
9. Linder JA, Schnipper JL, Tsurikova R, et al. Barriers to electronic health record use during patient visits. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2006:499-503.
10. Mitchell E, Sullivan F. A descriptive feast but an evaluative famine: systematic review of published articles on primary care computing during 1980-97. BMJ 2001;322:279-82.
11. Hynes DM, Perrin RA, Rappaport S, et al. Informatics resources to support health care quality improvement in the veterans health administration. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2004;11:344-50.
12. Brown SH, Lincoln MJ, Groen PJ, et al. VistA-U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs national-scale HIS. Int J Med Inform 2003;69:135-56.
13. Patterson ES, Doebbeling BN, Fung CH, et al. Identifying barriers to the effective use of clinical reminders: bootstrapping multiple methods. J Biomed Inform 2005;38:189-99.
14. Saleem JJ, Patterson ES, Militello L, et al. Exploring barriers and facilitators to the use of computerized clinical reminders. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2005;12:438-47.
15. Flanagan ME, Saleem JJ, Millitello LG, et al. Paper-and computer-based workarounds to electronic health record use at three benchmark institutions. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2013;20(e1):e59-66.
16. Saleem JJ, Russ AL, Justice CF, et al. Exploring the persistence of paper with the electronic health record. Int J Med Inform 2009;78:618-28.
17. Ventres W, Kooienga S, Marlin R, et al. Clinician style and examination room computers: a video ethnography. Fam Med 2005;37:276-81.
18. Woods DD, Roth EM. Cognitive engineering: human problem solving with tools. Hum Factors 1988;30:415-30.
19. Hutchins E. Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1995.
20. Saleem JJ, Russ AL, Sanderson P, et al. Current challenges and opportunities for better integration of human factors research with development of clinical information systems. Yearb Med Inform 2009:48-58.
21. McMullen CK, Ash JS, Sittig DF, et al. Rapid assessment of clinical information systems in the healthcare setting: an efficient method for time-pressed evaluation. Methods Inf Med 2011;50:299-307.
22. Rugg G, McGeorge P. The sorting techniques: a tutorial paper on card sorts, picture sorts and item sorts. Expert Syst 1997;14:80-93.
23. Kerr EA, Gerzoff RB, Krein SL, et al. Diabetes care quality in the Veterans Affairs Health Care System and commercial managed care: the TRIAD study. Ann Intern Med 2004;141:272-81.
24. Snyder-Halpern R. Indicators of organizational readiness for clinical information technology/systems innovation: a Delphi study. Int J Med Inform 2001;63: 179-204.
25. Stead WW, Lin HSeds. Computational technology for effective health care. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2009.
26. Saleem JJ, Flanagan ME, Wilck NR, et al. The next-generation electronic health record: perspectives of key leaders from the US Department of Veterans Affairs. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2013;20:e175-7.