Clinician style and examination room computers: A video ethnography

Family Medicine

Volumn 37, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 276-281

  Ventres, William ^a   Kooienga, Sarah ^b   Marlin, Ryan ^c   Vuckovic, Nancy ^d   Stewart, Valerie ^b  

^a MULTNOMAH COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT   (United States)

^b EARLE A CHILES RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^c OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d KAISER PERMANENTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; COMPUTER; ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD; GENERAL PRACTITIONER; HUMAN; INTERVIEW; MEDICAL EXAMINATION; MEDICAL PRACTICE; MEDICAL RECORD; NORMAL HUMAN; NURSE PRACTITIONER; VIDEORECORDING; VIDEOTAPE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CHILD; COMMUNICATION; COMPUTERS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MEDICAL INFORMATICS APPLICATIONS; MIDDLE AGED; NURSE PRACTITIONERS; PHYSICAL EXAMINATION; PHYSICIAN'S PRACTICE PATTERNS; PHYSICIANS, FAMILY; PROFESSIONAL-PATIENT RELATIONS; VIDEOTAPE RECORDING;

EID: 17144379300     PISSN: 07423225     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Knottnerus JA. Role of the electronic patient record in the development of general practice in The Netherlands. Methods Inf Med 1999;38:350-4.
2. Burns R. Information for health: an information strategy for the modern NHS 1998-2005. Leeds, United Kingdom: NHS Executive, 1998.
3. Chin T. Americans trail much of Europe in adopting EMRs. American Medical News September 20, 2002:34.
4. Bodenheimer T, Grumbach K. Electronic technology: a spark to revitalized primary care. JAMA 2003;290:259-64.
5. Institute of Medicine. Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 2002.
6. Martin J, Avant R, Bowman M, et al. The future of family medicine: a collaborative project of the family medicine community. Ann Fam Med 2004;2(suppl 1):S3-S32.
7. Mitchell E, Sullivan F. A descriptive feast but an evaluative famine: systematic review of published articles on primary care computing 1980-1997. BMJ 2001;322:279-82.
8. Hippisley J, Pringle M, Cater R, et al. The electronic patient record in primary care-regression or progression? A cross-sectional study. BMJ 2003;326:1439-43.
9. Als AB. The desktop computer as a magic box: patterns of behaviour connected with the desktop computer; GPs' and patients' perceptions. Fam Pract 1997;14:17-22.
10. Warshawsky S, Pliskin J, Urkin J, et al. Physician use of a computerized medical record system during the patient encounter: a descriptive study. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 1994;43:269-73.
11. Greatbatch D, Heath C, Campion P, Luff P. How do desktop computers affect the doctor-patient interaction? Fam Pract 1995;12:32-6.
12. Herzmark G, Brownbridge G, Fitter M, Evans A. Consultation use of a computer by general practitioners. J R Coll Gen Pract 1984;34:649-54.
13. Makoul G, Curry R, Tang P. The use of electronic medical records. J Am Med Assoc 2001;8:610-5.
14. Patel VL, Arocha JF, Kushniruk AW. Patients' and physicians' understanding of health and biomedical concepts: relationship to the design of EMR systems. J Biomed Inform 2002;35:8-16.
15. Savage J. Ethnography and health care. BMJ 2000;321:1400-2.
16. Ventres WB, Frankel RM. Ethnography: a stepwise approach to primary care. Fam Med 1996;28(1):52-6.
17. Helman CG. Research in primary care: the qualitative approach. In: Norton PG, Stewart M, Tudiver F, Bass MJ, Dunn EV, eds. Primary care research: traditional and innovative approaches. Newbery Park, Calif: Sage Publications, 1991:105-24.
18. Arborelius E, Timpka T. In what way may videotapes be used to get significant information about patient-physician relationship. Med Teach 1990;12:197-208.
19. Patton MQ. Enhancing the quality and credibility of qualitative research. Health Serv Res 1999;34:1189-208.
20. Bernard HR, Ryan GW. Qualitative and quantitative methods. In: Bernard HR, ed. Handbook of methods in cultural anthropology. Walnut Creek, Calif: AltaMira Press, 1998.
21. Trotter RT, Schensul JJ. Methods in applied anthropology. In: Bernard HR, ed. Handbook of methods of cultural anthropology. Walnut Creek, Calif: AltaMira Press, 1998:691-736.
22. Geertz C. The interpretation of cultures. London: Hutchinson, 1975.
23. Aaronson JW, Murphy-Cullen CL, Cullen WM, Chop WM, Frey RD. Electronic medical records: the family practice resident perspective. Fam Med 2001;33(2):128-32.
24. Ridsdale L, Hudd S. Computers in the consultation: the patient's view. BMJ 1994;44:367-9.
25. Flocke SA, Miller WL, Crabtree BF. Relationships between physician practice style, patient satisfaction, and attributes of primary care. J Fam Pract 2002;51:835-40.
26. Roter DL, Stewart M, Putnam SM, Lipkin M Jr, Stiles W, Inui TS. Communication patterns of primary care physicians. JAMA 1997;277:350-6.