Safety of tissue expander/implant versus autologous abdominal tissue breast reconstruction in postmastectomy breast cancer patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

Volumn 133, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 234-249

  Tsoi, Bernice ^b   Ziolkowski, Natalia I ^a   Thoma, Achilleas ^a   Campbell, Kaitryn ^a   O'Reilly, Daria ^a   Goeree, Ron ^a  

^a MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABDOMINAL FAT; BREAST IMPLANT; BREAST RECONSTRUCTION; BREAST TUMOR; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MASTECTOMY; META ANALYSIS; METHODOLOGY; REVIEW; TISSUE EXPANDER; TRANSPLANTATION;

ABDOMINAL FAT; BREAST IMPLANTS; BREAST NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAMMAPLASTY; MASTECTOMY; TISSUE EXPANSION DEVICES;

EID: 84893528697     PISSN: 00321052     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.prs.0000436847.94408.11     Document Type: Review

References (38)

1. Al-Ghazal SK, Fallowfeld L, Blamey RW. Comparison of psychological aspects and patient satisfaction following breast conserving surgery, simple mastectomy and breast reconstruction. Eur J Cancer 2000;36:1938-1943.
2. Serletti JM, Fosnot J, Nelson JA, Disa JJ, Bucky LP. Breast reconstruction after breast cancer. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;127:124e-135e.
3. Guyomard V, Leinster S, Wilkinson M. Systematic review of studies of patients' satisfaction with breast reconstruction after mastectomy. Breast 2007;16:547-567.
4. Potter S, Winters Z. Does breast reconstruction improve quality of life for women facing mastectomy? A systematic review. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2008;34:1181.
5. Teimourian B, Adham MN. Survey of patients' responses to breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 1982;9:321-325.
6. Schain WS. Breast reconstruction: Update of psychosocial and pragmatic concerns. Cancer 1991;68(Suppl):1170-1175.
7. D'Souza N, Darmanin G, Fedorowicz Z. Immediate versus delayed reconstruction following surgery for breast cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;(7):CD008674.
8. Fischbacher C. Immediate versus delayed breast reconstruction. In: Bazian, Ltd., eds. STEER: Succinct and Timely Evaluated Evidence Reviews. London: Wessex Institute for Health Research and Development, University of Southampton; 2002:4-16.
9. Alderman AK, Wilkins EG, Kim HM, Lowery JC. Complications in postmastectomy breast reconstruction: Two-year results of the Michigan Breast Reconstruction Outcome Study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002;109:2265-2274.
10. Atisha DM, Alderman AK, Kuhn LE, Wilkins EG. The impact of obesity on patient satisfaction with breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;121:1893-1899.
11. Hu ES, Pusic AL, Waljee JF, et al. Patient-reported aesthetic satisfaction with breast reconstruction during the long-term survivorship period. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;124:1-8.
12. Alderman AK, Atisha D, Streu R, et al. Patterns and correlates of postmastectomy breast reconstruction by U.S. Plastic surgeons: Results from a national survey. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;127:1796-1803.
13. Chawla AK, Kachnic LA, Taghian AG, Niemierko A, Zapton DT, Powell SN. Radiotherapy and breast reconstruction: Complications and cosmesis with TRAM versus tissue expander/implant. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2002;54:520-526.
14. Lin KY, Johns FR, Gibson J, Long M, Drake DB, Moore MM. An outcome study of breast reconstruction: Presurgical iden-tifcation of risk factors for complications. Ann Surg Oncol. 2001;8:586-591.
15. Roje Z, Roje Z, Jankovic S, Ninkovic M. Breast reconstruction after mastectomy. Coll Antropol. 2010;34(Suppl 1):113-123.
16. Tzafetta K, Ahmed O, Bahia H, Jerwood D, Ramakrishnan V. Evaluation of the factors related to postmastectomy breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001;107:1694-1701.
17. Crosby MA, Garvey PB, Selber JC, et al. Reconstructive outcomes in patients undergoing contralateral prophylactic mastectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;128:1025-1033.
18. Jensen JA, Orringer JS, Giuliano AE. Nipple-sparing mastectomy in 99 patients with a mean follow-up of 5 years. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18:1665-1670.
19. Wells GA, Shea B, O'Connell D et al. The Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses. 3rd Symposium on Systematic Reviews: Beyond the Basics, Oxford, UK, July 3-5, 2000 Available at: www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical-epidemiology/oxford.html. Accessed March 31, 2013.
20. Lundh A, Gøtzsche PC. Recommendations by Cochrane Review Groups for assessment of the risk of bias in studies. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2008;8:22.
21. Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC, et al. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: A proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group. JAMA 2000;283:2008-2012.
22. Dudley RA, Rennie DJ, Luft HS. Population choice and variable selection in the estimation and application of risk models. Inquiry 1999;36:200-211.
23. Higgins JPT, Green S. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Sussex: The Cochrane Collaboration; John Wiley & Sons Ltd; 2008.
24. Adesiyun TA, Lee BT, Yueh JH, et al. Impact of sequencing of postmastectomy radiotherapy and breast reconstruction on timing and rate of complications and patient satisfaction. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011;80:392-397.
25. Alderman AK, Kuzon WM Jr, Wilkins EG. A two-year prospective analysis of trunk function in TRAM breast reconstructions. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;117:2131-2138.
26. Anderson PR, Hanlon AL, Fowble BL, McNeeley SW, Freedman GM. Low complication rates are achievable after postmastectomy breast reconstruction and radiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004;59:1080-1087.
27. Bowman CC, Lennox PA, Clugston PA, Courtemanche DJ. Breast reconstruction in older women: Should age be an exclusion criterion? Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;118:16-22.
28. Langstein HN, Cheng MH, Singletary SE, et al. Breast cancer recurrence after immediate reconstruction: Patterns and sig-nifcance. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003;111:712-720.
29. Lim W, Ko BS, Kim HJ, et al. Oncological safety of skin sparing mastectomy followed by immediate reconstruction for locally advanced breast cancer. J Surg Oncol. 2010;102:39-42.
30. Rubino C, Figus A, Lorettu L, Sechi G. Post-mastectomy reconstruction: A comparative analysis on psychosocial and psychopathological outcomes. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2007;60:509-518.
31. Prabhu R, Godette K, Carlson G, et al. The impact of skin-sparing mastectomy with immediate reconstruction in patients with stage III breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and postmastectomy radiation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012;82:e587-e593.
32. Kocher RP, Adashi EY. Hospital readmissions and the Affordable Care Act: Paying for coordinated quality care. JAMA 2011;306:1794-1795.
33. Kronowitz SJ, Robb GL. Radiation therapy and breast reconstruction: A critical review of the literature. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;124:395-408.
34. Ascherman JA, Hanasono MM, Newman MI, Hughes DB. Implant reconstruction in breast cancer patients treated with radiation therapy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;117: 359-365.
35. Fernández-Frías AM, Aguilar J, Sánchez JA, Merck B, Piñero A, Calpena R. Immediate reconstruction after mastectomy for breast cancer: Which factors affect its course and fnal outcome? J Am Coll Surg. 2009;208:126-133.
36. Pomahac B, Recht A, May JW, Hergrueter CA, Slavin SA. New trends in breast cancer management: Is the era of immediate breast reconstruction changing? Ann Surg. 2006;244:282-288.
37. Atisha D, Alderman AK, Lowery JC, Kuhn LE, Davis J, Wilkins EG. Prospective analysis of long-term psychosocial outcomes in breast reconstruction: Two-year postoperative results from the Michigan Breast Reconstruction Outcomes Study. Ann Surg. 2008;247:1019-1028.
38. Alderman AK, Kuhn LE, Lowery JC, Wilkins EG. Does patient satisfaction with breast reconstruction change over time? Two-year results of the Michigan Breast Reconstruction Outcomes Study. J Am Coll Surg. 2007;204:7-12.