Do close relatives make bad neighbors?

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Volumn 111, Issue 5, 2014, Pages

  Sol, Daniel ^a   Lapiedra, Oriol ^a   Vilà, Montserrat ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BARCELONA   (Spain)

^b DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION BIOLOGY   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; COMMUNITY ECOLOGY; COMPETITOR SPECIES; ECOLOGY; HABIT; INTRODUCED SPECIES; LETTER; NATURALIZATION; NONHUMAN; ORGANISMS; PHYLOGENY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REPRODUCTIVE FITNESS; SPECIES; SPECIES COEXISTENCE;

ADAPTATION, BIOLOGICAL; ASTERACEAE; BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; INTRODUCED SPECIES; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PHYLOGENY;

EID: 84893491379     PISSN: 00278424     EISSN: 10916490     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1320729111     Document Type: Letter

References (5)

1. Park DS, Potter D (2013) A test of Darwin's naturalization hypothesis in the thistle tribe shows that close relatives make bad neighbors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110(44):17915-17920.
2. Parker IM, et al. (1999) Impact: Toward a framework for understanding the ecological effects of invaders. Biol Invasions 1(1):3-19.
3. Thuiller W, et al. (2010) Resolving Darwin's naturalization conundrum: A quest for evidence. Divers Distrib 16(3):461-475.
4. Diez JM, Sullivan JJ, Hulme PE, Edwards G, Duncan RP (2008) Darwin's naturalization conundrum: Dissecting taxonomic patterns of species invasions. Ecol Lett 11(7):674-681.
5. Duncan RP, Blackburn TM, Sol D (2003) The ecology of bird introductions. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 34:71-98.