Tapenade: A tool for automatic differentiation of program

ECCOMAS 2004 - European Congress on Computational Methods in Applied Sciences and Engineering

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages

  Hascoët, Laurent ^a  

^a INRIA   (France)

Author keywords

Adjoint algorithm; Adjoint code; Automatic differentiation; Gradient; Optimization

Indexed keywords

ADJOINT CODES; ADJOINTS; AUTOMATIC DIFFERENTIATIONS; DEVELOPMENT COSTS; DIRECTIONAL DERIVATIVE; INTERNAL ALGORITHMS; PROGRAM ANALYSIS; VECTOR FUNCTIONS;

ALGORITHMS; COMPUTATIONAL METHODS; GRADIENT METHODS; OPTIMIZATION; TOOLS;

MATHEMATICAL TRANSFORMATIONS;

EID: 84893474647     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (11)

1. A. Aho, R. Sethi, and J. Ullman. Compilers: Principles, Techniques and Tools. Addison-Wesley, 1986.
2. A. Carle and M. Fagan. ADIFOR 3.0 overview. Technical Report CAAM-TR-00-02, Rice University, 2000.
3. G. Corliss, C. Faure, A. Griewank, L. Hascoët, and U. Naumann (editors). Automatic Differentiation of Algorithms, from Simulation to Optimization. Springer, 2001. Selected proceedings of AD2000, Nice, France.
4. F. Courty, A. Dervieux, B. Koobus, and L. Hascoët. Reverse automatic differentiation for optimum design: From adjoint state assembly to gradient computation. Optimization Methods and Software, 18(5):615-627, 2003.
5. C. Faure and U. Naumann. The taping problem in automatic differentiation. In [3] Automatic Differentiation of Algorithms, from Simulation to Optimization, pages 293-298, 2001.
6. R. Giering. Tangent linear and adjoint model compiler, users manual. Technical report, 1997. [www http://www.autodiff.com/tamc].
7. M.-B. Giles. Adjoint methods for aeronautical design. In Proceedings of the ECCO-MAS CFD Conference, 2001.
8. A. Griewank. Evaluating Derivatives: Principles and Techniques of Algorithmic Differentiation. SIAM, Frontiers in Applied Mathematics, 2000.
9. L. Hascoët, M. Vázquez, and A. Dervieux. Automatic differentiation for optimum design, applied to sonic boom reduction. In V. Kumar et al., editors, Proceedings of ICCSA '03, Montreal, Canada, LNCS 2668, pages 85-94. Springer, 2003.
10. F.-X. Le Dimet and O. Talagrand. Variational algorithms for analysis and assimilation of meteorological observations: theoretical aspects. Tellus, 38A:97-110, 1986.
11. U. Naumann. Reducing the memory requirement in reverse mode automatic differentiation by solving TBR flow equations. In Proceedings of the ICCS 2000 Conference on Computational Science, Part II, LNCS. Springer, 2002.